• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare the aims, methods and achievements of MLK and Malcolm X. Which man do you think was most successful at achieving civil rights for African Americans in the 1960s?

Extracts from this document...


Compare the aims, methods and achievements of MLK and Malcolm X. Which man do you think was most successful at achieving civil rights for African Americans in the 1960s? I would suggest that Martin Luther king was the more successful man in terms of achieving civil rights for African Americans in the 1960s. While this may seem a choice influenced by public image, I would suggest that there were issues with Malcolm X's image and methodology that made it unlikely that he would ever be accepted (and thus, respected) by White America. I think that Martin Luther King, while viewed by some blacks with contempt for his relatively moderate attitude, genuinely evaluated the situation in which he was operating and suited his modus operandi to make it as beneficial as possible. As a result of this, I think that Martin Luther King made it easier for himself to achieve his aims of bringing about equality for African-Americans in the 1960s in America. I will, however, examine in greater detail the differences in the methodology of the men later on. Put simply, Martin Luther King aimed to ensure that black people were equal in America in the 1960s. Inequality was made manifest through segregation, whether in the guise of schooling, buses, or 'whites only' benches. This stemmed mostly from King's childhood and experiences as a young adult, one of which led to him being threatened with a gun for demanding service in a segregated restaurant. ...read more.


But the mass action used in initiatives such as the March on Washington in 1963 made black issues impossible to ignore, and helped black people experience solidarity and ubiquity in their anonymity and numbers. King himself proclaimed: "The Negro is shedding his fear", and while this is something King was worried about, I think that this is something that was in fact brought about by King. Black people in America could now see that it was acceptable to feel insulted; angry and bitter about the injustices of slavery. Because of this, I would suggest that Martin Luther King succeeded in his aims as I would suggest it was his methodology of mass action that inspired black people to rise up, and the White House (and people) to sit up and listen. However, there was to be another character with what some today would consider a more direct influence on the position of black people in 1960s America. Malcolm X approached the Civil rights struggle in America in the 1960s in a very different manner to King indeed, and I would suggest that in spite of his iconographic status, he largely failed in his aims. X aimed to rail against the whole idea of demanding Civil Rights, suggesting that black and white men could never be truly equal. X regarded black people as Africans 'who just happened to be in America', and as such X took up a position described by Cornell as 'The basic aim... ...read more.


To conclude, I would suggest that while both Martin Luther King and Malcolm X had flaws which, ultimately, crippled the growth of the Civil Rights Movement, they both contributed in significantly different ways to the fight for black Civil Rights. While I would contend that the theological and occasionally violence beliefs of Malcolm X made him seem unacceptable to white America, I think that his effective martyrdom resulted in disaffected black youths returning to political activism after they felt shunned by what they perceived to be 'Uncle Tom' behaviours on the part of King. One could, I feel, successfully argue that X's increased appeal also came from his 'everyman' upbringing in Harlem, and that black youths could not truly identify with a Southern minister. In addition,one could argue that King's campaign depended on violence as much as X's. If King's activists and followers were not viciously suppressed, I doubt that moderate America would have eventually got round to championing their cause, evidenced by the fact that approximately a quarter of participants in the 'March on Washington' 1963 were white. However, I would suggest that King's populism was to raise a number of black activists and student dissenters that would result in white America being cowed by the influence of millions of African-Americans, and, finally, result in the Civil Rights that black America had been fighting for. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level History of the USA, 1840-1968 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level History of the USA, 1840-1968 essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    To what extent were Malcolm X and the subsequent Black Power Movement the 'Evil ...

    4 star(s)

    psychological burden upon...victims" of the violent oppression at the hands of white Americans.21 A strong criticism of Malcolm X has been that he incited violence but this was not his aim. He was against the 'turn the other cheek' philosophy of King and, rather than using random acts of violence

  2. Peer reviewed

    Assess the view that the Supreme Court was the most important branch of federal ...

    4 star(s)

    Board of Education seems to go completely against the constitution supposedly upheld by the Supreme Court, given the huge differences in funding between schools for black and white children. The Supreme Court could hardly be considered to merely be interpreting the law to their own desires here, but rather completely

  1. Short term impact of Malcolm X

    Malcolm X stated that "he does not believe in passive resistance" he tells how "every Negro ought to have a weapon in his house, any Negro who is attacked should fight back; if necessary he should be prepared to die like a man"20 this, in one sense agreed with a

  2. How Successful Was Martin Luther Kings Campaign For Civil Rights Between 1955-68?

    However, when King led a march of 250 protestors to City Hall all of the protestors were arrested. Pritchett handled these prisoners very courteously, which diffused the power of their non-violent protest: with no physical conflict there was no media spectacular and no national coverage.

  1. How did the aims and methods of Martin Luther King and Malcolm X differ?

    Malcolm was in favour of Black Power and pride in one?s race which can be observed in his speech in 1962 in Los Angeles, where he asked his black audience ?Who taught you to hate yourselves?? His activity came down to speeches and sermons on Black Pride and fighting for their rights.

  2. Martin Luther King. Martin was one of Americas greatest civil rights activists, shaping ...

    His speech at the march, ?I have a Dream? is one of the most famous speeches in American History. He talked about a future where there was racial equality, where Americans were truly living the American Dream (belief that American was the land of opportunity), and where people wouldn?t be

  1. How far do you agree that the Black Power movement hindered the civil rights ...

    thus a major hindrance to its progress, it can be argued that the movement had numerous positive effects on African-Americans as a whole, rather than as a promoter of civil rights. During the 1960s, and perhaps for many decades before, African-Americans had been the most economically and socially deprived racial group in American society.

  2. How far were the forces opposed to civil rights responsible for the failure of ...

    Some of the opposition came from state governments in the North, for example when King tried to tackle the problem of segregation in housing in Chicago, he was met by strong opposition from not only the residents, but mayor Richard Daley as well.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work