• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
  12. 12
    12
  13. 13
    13
  14. 14
    14
  15. 15
    15
  16. 16
    16
  17. 17
    17
  18. 18
    18

Compare the characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

HISTORY COURSEWORK ASSIGNMENT A: 1: Compare the characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin. Both Lenin and Stalin had similar characters, they were very ambitious in terms of politician as they always aimed to achive more and more, they would do everything what�s in their power to be much more powerful than they were already, this power would give them pore strengh within their posts. This ambition could be determined. Along their lives they had always someone hanging around them to take advantage of any possible opportunity to get nearer and nearer of becoming their most dilligent and efficient workers. Lenin and Stalin had colleagues and followers rather than friends. A clear example which justifies this fact is that Stalin itself was always beside Lenin in order to become his successor. We can argue that both of them gave entirely to politics no matter for what they were fighting for, if it was beneficial or not to Russia, but at the same time it is to say that if someone who suggested their capability or qualities as a leader they would have serious problems. Overall they were both very humourless. Evidence which proves my idea is that almost everyone did whay ever they wanted them to do, their supporters were committed to do what both Lenin and Stalin told them to do, if they didn�t obey their orders they could be involved in serious problems with them. Not only they could be punished severely but they also used the terror, especially Stalin. No one could even disagree with them, everyone had to demonstrate that they were doing the correct things at all times. They stopped others to express themselves and their personal opinions. Generally people who opposed them were arrested, and perhaps send to prison. Lenin and Stalin, have demonstrated that they were intolerant, evident information to support this fact is the stubborn mind they were constructed of, and all was to be done immediately and whenever they wished to, not only they ...read more.

Middle

Apart from all the industrial, agricultural benefits this lead to, one of the main important things was electrification. Electrification was one step forward. Lenin was enthusiastic with the idea of technological innovation and saw electric power as the key to modernising the Soviet Union. He gave a great network of power station which would provide the power for modern large-scale industry. Lenin believed electric power would change things so much that he said that.��Soviet power plus electrification equals Communism.�� Another very important aspect of the NEP was the foreign trade, the NEP encouraged foreign countries, which had refused to trade with Soviet Russia before 1921. Western countries hoped that the move back to private trade and profit - capitalism - meant the failure of Communists ideas. An Anglo - Soviet trade agreement in 1921 marked the beginning of increased trade with the West which gave a great boost to the Soviet economy. There were exchanges of Western industrial goods for the Russians oil and similar products. Thse were some examples which back up the idea that the NEP had been successful. Lenin demonstrated with the April Theses that he would sopport the Bolsheviks for ever. Lenin changed the whole course of the revolution. The Germans were pleased to see him, hoping that he could cause trouble for the Russian government. They gave him money and put him in a special sealed train which the destinaton was Petrograd. The Germans were right. Lenin did cause a stir and he did make trouble. The first thing Lenin did when he arrived was a speech demanding four main issues. He said that there should be no co - operation with the Provisional Government. Lenin demanded that war should be ended immediately. Furtheremore the land should be given to the peasants, and the final point, Lenin had been clear enough to understand his demands, that the Soviets should take power. ...read more.

Conclusion

HISTORY COURSEWORK.RUSSIA 1905-1941 ASSIGNMENT B:OBJECTIVE 3 STALIN:MAN OR MONSTER? 1: Study sources A, B and C. Do these sources give a similar or different impressions of Stalin? Explain your answer. Source A gives the real image of what Stalin�s results had been due to his policies. This source reflects how ambitious and cruel Stalin had reached to be, in order to achieve his proposed aims. Stalin�s main aim was to have control of everyone and everything, no matter how many lives he� sacrified if the final result was beneficial for him. This source is a clear example of what Stalin�s feelings were after his policies had finished.My impression is that Stalin was proud of what he had achieved, he was a man who didn�t mind what problems he had caused to Russia with his policies. Stalin brought to the Russian people a lot of disaster as aconsequence of his unconsciencious thoughts and his selfishness. This source shows Stalin as evil, cruel and like a murderer proud of what he has done, so therefore a monster. Stalin is shown as an arrogant man really proud of his masterpiece and what he had achieved so far. Stalin killed millions of people and he considers it a wonder compared with the pyramid of Egypt. I also deduce from this source that he had blood thirsty and that he�s evilness and cruelty didin�t let him see what was really happening in Russia. It also reflects that he doesn�t feel guilty for all those deaths, who in many cases could have been avoided if Stalin had opened his eyes. Evidence which proves this cruelty with what Stalin was characterised, with the purges he intriduced in 1934. I think that Source A as we may see, shows Stalin�s policies of terror. The two methods Stalin used to encourage people to do what he wanted were the force and persuassion. Sources B and and C are what we call false propaganda. 2: Study source D Does this source provide any useful information about Stalin? Explain your answer. F ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. "Stalin transformed the Soviet Union from a backward country into a strong modern state ...

    their Five Year Plans and collectivisation, it is quite easy to see why some Russians would look back on Stalin's time with nostalgia, as it was commonly perceived as the time when the USSR had greatly increased its economic position and social pride.

  2. Historians such as Pipes and Volkogonov have made the interpretation that Lenin was a ...

    Emergency decisions needed to be taken quickly, thus decision making become more centralised. This view is supported by the fact that, in Nizhniy-Novgorod, the local Mafia of black marketers who defied Moscow controlled everything. So it is understandable the regime should have used the party structure to gain more centralised

  1. Stalins Russia, 1924-53 revision guide

    * This helps to explain why, although reduced, the process of purging continued after the war despite the victory which had been achieved in 1945. Purging was reintroduced as a means of centralisation and control. * From 1946-48 was a period of so called 'party renewal' - the Zhdanovshchina ('in the time of Zhdanov')

  2. Role of Women Under Stalin

    3 The evidence concerning women and marriages: * "The 1926 Marriage Code established community property in marriage and easy divorce procedures, even divorce by mail." 4 * "By 1934, 37 percent of marriages in Moscow ended in divorce." 5 * "In 1935 divorce was made more difficult and expensive for women to obtain."

  1. Did Stalin betray the Russian Revolution?

    Bloody Sunday in 1905 pales in comparison with Stalin's astonishing lack of sympathy or action for a perpetually poor and starving nation. While the Tsar lived in the opulence of the Winter Palace, Stalin was widely held to be living a modest life; paradoxically the only part of Marxist doctrine he did not seem to twist to suit himself.

  2. Causes of show trials + purges of 1930s.

    a struggle in the battle of power between Stalin and his opposition. Brezezinski argues that the motive for the purge of the Party was the exponential growth of the Party that had led to a "weakened diligence," and a "lower political acumen," of the party membership.[24] By showing these ideas,

  1. The Significance of Lenin in the Bolshevik Revolution (1917-1923)

    He showed his fairness and insight by recognising and promoting talented soldiers who had never been made officers in the Tsarist army. Men such as Zukov would become the best generals in the army. While in power Trotsky may have made some unpopular choices, but overall it is clear that

  2. Assess the impact of Lenin on Events in Russia between 1917 -1924

    would vote in this so would be happy with the leader as they would have voted for them so there would be less call for revolution. Lenin calculated the Revolution and so therefore he played one of the most important roles in it.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work