• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
  12. 12
    12
  13. 13
    13
  14. 14
    14
  15. 15
    15
  16. 16
    16
  17. 17
    17
  18. 18
    18

Compare the characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

HISTORY COURSEWORK ASSIGNMENT A: 1: Compare the characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin. Both Lenin and Stalin had similar characters, they were very ambitious in terms of politician as they always aimed to achive more and more, they would do everything what�s in their power to be much more powerful than they were already, this power would give them pore strengh within their posts. This ambition could be determined. Along their lives they had always someone hanging around them to take advantage of any possible opportunity to get nearer and nearer of becoming their most dilligent and efficient workers. Lenin and Stalin had colleagues and followers rather than friends. A clear example which justifies this fact is that Stalin itself was always beside Lenin in order to become his successor. We can argue that both of them gave entirely to politics no matter for what they were fighting for, if it was beneficial or not to Russia, but at the same time it is to say that if someone who suggested their capability or qualities as a leader they would have serious problems. Overall they were both very humourless. Evidence which proves my idea is that almost everyone did whay ever they wanted them to do, their supporters were committed to do what both Lenin and Stalin told them to do, if they didn�t obey their orders they could be involved in serious problems with them. Not only they could be punished severely but they also used the terror, especially Stalin. No one could even disagree with them, everyone had to demonstrate that they were doing the correct things at all times. They stopped others to express themselves and their personal opinions. Generally people who opposed them were arrested, and perhaps send to prison. Lenin and Stalin, have demonstrated that they were intolerant, evident information to support this fact is the stubborn mind they were constructed of, and all was to be done immediately and whenever they wished to, not only they ...read more.

Middle

Apart from all the industrial, agricultural benefits this lead to, one of the main important things was electrification. Electrification was one step forward. Lenin was enthusiastic with the idea of technological innovation and saw electric power as the key to modernising the Soviet Union. He gave a great network of power station which would provide the power for modern large-scale industry. Lenin believed electric power would change things so much that he said that.��Soviet power plus electrification equals Communism.�� Another very important aspect of the NEP was the foreign trade, the NEP encouraged foreign countries, which had refused to trade with Soviet Russia before 1921. Western countries hoped that the move back to private trade and profit - capitalism - meant the failure of Communists ideas. An Anglo - Soviet trade agreement in 1921 marked the beginning of increased trade with the West which gave a great boost to the Soviet economy. There were exchanges of Western industrial goods for the Russians oil and similar products. Thse were some examples which back up the idea that the NEP had been successful. Lenin demonstrated with the April Theses that he would sopport the Bolsheviks for ever. Lenin changed the whole course of the revolution. The Germans were pleased to see him, hoping that he could cause trouble for the Russian government. They gave him money and put him in a special sealed train which the destinaton was Petrograd. The Germans were right. Lenin did cause a stir and he did make trouble. The first thing Lenin did when he arrived was a speech demanding four main issues. He said that there should be no co - operation with the Provisional Government. Lenin demanded that war should be ended immediately. Furtheremore the land should be given to the peasants, and the final point, Lenin had been clear enough to understand his demands, that the Soviets should take power. ...read more.

Conclusion

HISTORY COURSEWORK.RUSSIA 1905-1941 ASSIGNMENT B:OBJECTIVE 3 STALIN:MAN OR MONSTER? 1: Study sources A, B and C. Do these sources give a similar or different impressions of Stalin? Explain your answer. Source A gives the real image of what Stalin�s results had been due to his policies. This source reflects how ambitious and cruel Stalin had reached to be, in order to achieve his proposed aims. Stalin�s main aim was to have control of everyone and everything, no matter how many lives he� sacrified if the final result was beneficial for him. This source is a clear example of what Stalin�s feelings were after his policies had finished.My impression is that Stalin was proud of what he had achieved, he was a man who didn�t mind what problems he had caused to Russia with his policies. Stalin brought to the Russian people a lot of disaster as aconsequence of his unconsciencious thoughts and his selfishness. This source shows Stalin as evil, cruel and like a murderer proud of what he has done, so therefore a monster. Stalin is shown as an arrogant man really proud of his masterpiece and what he had achieved so far. Stalin killed millions of people and he considers it a wonder compared with the pyramid of Egypt. I also deduce from this source that he had blood thirsty and that he�s evilness and cruelty didin�t let him see what was really happening in Russia. It also reflects that he doesn�t feel guilty for all those deaths, who in many cases could have been avoided if Stalin had opened his eyes. Evidence which proves this cruelty with what Stalin was characterised, with the purges he intriduced in 1934. I think that Source A as we may see, shows Stalin�s policies of terror. The two methods Stalin used to encourage people to do what he wanted were the force and persuassion. Sources B and and C are what we call false propaganda. 2: Study source D Does this source provide any useful information about Stalin? Explain your answer. F ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    To what extent does Stalin deserve the title of Red Tsar when assessing his ...

    5 star(s)

    and Stolypin in a hope that at some point in the future social class would be eradicated. However Stalin sought to eliminate this class by waging class warfare and controlling discontent through purges of the population, the Kulaks were denounced and wiped out by Stalin.

  2. Did Stalin betray the Russian Revolution?

    Even after Communism had been made secure in the USSR, he showed no interest in spreading it. Communist victories internationally owed little or nothing to him or his government, notably Mao Zedong's 'People's Republic' of China in 1949. At the Yalta conference he refused to support the Greek Communist party,

  1. Stalins Russia, 1924-53 revision guide

    its pre war levels and to an extent it achieved those aims, e.g. electricity output was higher in 1950 than ten years earlier. What was the extent of post-war repression? * Purges were the means by which the Communist leadership established complete control over the Soviet Empire.

  2. Assess the economic, social and political consequences of the collectivisation of Russian agriculture in ...

    These factors obviously hindered the chances of stimulating the economy, as collectivisation produced an unskilled and demoralised workforce, which is something that can also be seen as a negative social consequence of collectivisation. On the collective farms, however, the standards of living dramatically fell, as Stalin allocated the resources to

  1. Assess the impact of Lenin on Events in Russia between 1917 -1924

    Another way in which Lenin influenced the Civil war was by employing Trotsky as Commissar for War. In this position Trotsky went on to win the war for the Bolsheviks with his skilled organisation and his shrewd planning. Certain policies Lenin introduced during the war had an effect on the Bolshevik's war effort.

  2. Why did Stalin win the struggle for power in 1923 – 9?

    Zinoviev + Kamenev + Stalin Vs. Trotsky (1923 - 5) To take part in this battle Stalin had to regain the trust of the CPSU following Lenin's comments. Miraculously he managed it through his friend Zinoviev, who stood up for him and argued that Lenin was very ill and this may cloud or alter his judgment.

  1. How far were the socio-economic policies of Stalin aimed towards the modernisation of Soviet ...

    This could be seen as an attempt to unite the people and consequently strengthern Russia as a whole, ensuring national security against foreigners. Stalin turned people such as the Kulaks into enemies of Russia and used propaganda to increase the hatrid directed at these people.

  2. Why did Stalin win the struggle to power?

    used the making of "the cult of Lenin" to pass himself of as Lenin's disciple. This increased his own power immensely. However, he didn't actually stay loyal to Lenin's polices and often changed them in order to attack his oppostition and win over the public.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work