• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare The Political Leadership Of Lincoln and Davis.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Compare The Political Leadership Of Lincoln and Davis It may seem self- evident that Lincoln was the greater political leader; Lincoln led the winning side while Davis was defeated. It has though, been thought that once the Northern advantages and Southern disadvantages have been considered, that it is possible, that almost anyone could have led the North to victory. If this is so, was it Davis's strong leadership, which ensured that the confederacy survived as long as it did? Davis's government has inevitably been blamed for the way it ran the war. Certainly it made mistakes. But arguably it was no more mistake prone than Lincoln's government. Nor were the Southerners less dedicated than the Yankees. Most Southerners fought long and hard for their new nation, enduring far greater suffering and hardship than Northerners. The reality was that the South simply has less room for error. ...read more.

Middle

Most Northerners supported Lincoln and determined to see the war to a victorious conclusion. With fewer people, far less in the way of industrial capacity, a less well-developed railway system, and with a Northern blockade disrupting trade with Europe, the odds were stacked highly against the Confederacy from start. Moreover, while Lincoln took over a 'going' concern in Washington, Jefferson Davis's administration had to build the confederate government from scratch. To fight- let alone to win- the war, Southerners would need to make a far greater sacrifice than the Northerners. Ultimately the efforts of the Confederate government and the Southern people were in vain. The collapse of Northern morale was the South's best hope of victory. The North on the other hand, with its greater manpower and resources, was always favourite to win the civil war. ...read more.

Conclusion

Lincoln is generally seen as more successful in communicating with the people, more skilful in keeping political factions working together for a common goal, and better able to endure criticism and work with his critics. He is lauded for keeping all his commanders (including Grant) on a leash, for appointing the final winning military team, for picking able administrative subordinates, and for knowing how to delegate. Davis, on the other hand is often seen as austere, rigid, humourless and prone to making enemies: his feuds with two of his top generals, Beauregard and Joe Johnston, undoubtedly harmed the Southern war effort. Lincoln's superiority to Davis might seem self- evident. But Lee could think of no Confederate leader who had done a better job than Davis. And Lincoln did make mistakes. He went through six failures as commanders in the Virginia theatre before he found the right general. Some of his other military appointments and strategic decisions can also be criticised. It is worth remembering Wendell Phillips' view of him: 'He is a first-rate, second-rate man'. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level History of the USA, 1840-1968 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level History of the USA, 1840-1968 essays

  1. Lincoln vs. Davis in the Civil War

    Neither president made vastly better appointments than the other but the difference between them was that Lincoln was ruthless enough to sack his bad appointments whilst Davis could not bring himself to do so. Furthermore, Davis' relationship with his Vice President, Alexander Stephens was catastrophic; Davis and Stephens conflicted in personality and ideology.

  2. How far was the decision to rollback past the 38th parallel a military and ...

    area of Berlin, this demonstrated their power, in particular their economic power. America wanted to rollback for the same reason as the Berlin Blockade, to demonstrate their power to the communists. Another reason why the decision to rollback was effective for the military was due to the possibility of taking over North Korea.

  1. Why were the Liberals defeated in the general election of 1874?

    About sixty MPs were representatives of Nonconformist churches, such as Unitarians, Congregationalists or Baptists, or of Quakers, or Jews. A roughly equal number of MPs also seem to have generally sympathised with the Nonconformists, probably because many of their electorate were likeminded.

  2. Abraham Lincoln.

    His cheeks were leathery and flabby, falling in loose folds in places, looking sorrowful ." Lincoln eventually took partnership with Herndon, while campaigning in the 1844 election for Henry Clay. However, a personal interruption was now in the middle of his life.

  1. Does Abraham Lincoln deserve his reputation as one of the greatest of American presidents?

    He was above all firm in his convictions and dedicated to the preservation of the Union. On March 4, 1861 Abraham Lincoln delivered his first inaugural address focusing on supporting the North without further alienating the South, where he was almost universally hated or feared.

  2. "How Did The Election of Abraham Lincoln in 1860 lead to the Secession of ...

    The South also had little voice in the US congress, for only 83 out of 233 members came from Southern states. In the years before the civil war, the political power in the Federal Government was changing. The Northern and Mid-Western states were becoming more and more powerful; in contrast the southern states were losing political power.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work