• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare the reform measures of Czars Alexander II and Nicholas II with respect to their contents and effects.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Q6: Compare the reform measures of Czars Alexander II and Nicholas II with respect to their contents and effects. Russia had undergone tremendous changes during the 19th century and from 1861 to 1917, two Russian Czars Alexander II and Nicholas II had totally two different methods of dealing with the problems in Russia. Alexander II introduced much reform and people gave him the title "Czar Liberator". However, Nicholas II introduced just the opposite, reactive and oppressive measures which finally drove the Romanov Dynasty to collapse in 1917. The reform measures of the two Czars are quite different in respect to their contents and effects. However, both of them have the same aim that is to preserve Czardom and to maintain stability of their rule in Russia. The aims of the two Czars introducing reforms were different. Alexander II wanted to strengthen Russia as a whole, preserve his rule and stop any revolutionary movements against him. But Nicholas II introduced reforms because of Russia's defeat in the Russo-Japanese War in 1904. However, Nicholas II was in a way not sincere in implementing reforms but both of the Czars also wanted to preserve Czardom and to maintain autocratic rule. ...read more.

Middle

But the Duma was ineffective in a way that the Czar still possessed absolute power over the Duma. Afterwards, Nicholas II totally dismissed four Dumas and from the second one onwards, it was only a puppet of the Czar Nicholas, he regarded the Duma as a tool to gain the support from the people. The effect of both these government representations was great that people had more say and opportunity to express their opinions out. However, because of the autocratic nature of both Czars, the zemstva and Dumas were ineffective and gradually lost control by the Czar. People were becoming more and more dissatisfied with Czardom over this issue that eventually led to the 1917 Revolution. Alexander II during his reign, he introduced also judicial, military and education reforms. The judicial reforms made the Russian courts more efficient, just and fair. Trials became public, trial by jury was introduced and Justices of the Peace were elected as well. However, special trials for revolutionaries were still set up to stop the spread of revolution and unrest that threatened Czarist rule. Nicholas II was even more reactive because he completely banned the revolutionary movements and no public trials were set up for them. ...read more.

Conclusion

Apart from Emancipation, reforms on military, economic, education, judicial and local government, Alexander II has also introduced Russification and industrialization in order to strengthen Russian as a whole. He has also released the tight censorship. Even the aim of both Czars was the same, they wanted to preserve their autocratic rule and prevent any revolutionary movements, but why did the Romanov Dynasty collapse under the reign of Nicholas II but not Alexander II? Although both of the Czars tried to carry out reforms in order the prevent any revolutions, Alexander II implemented sincere reforms in order to gain the support from below, however, Nicholas II carried out repressive measures which brought him negative effects and finally led to Revolution in 1905 and collapse of Romanov Dynasty. Hence, in some senses that, Alexander II was more successful with his reforms than Nicholas II. As we can see, the nature of the reform measures of both Czars was autocratic in nature that hoped to pacify the people in order to continue Czardom. However, in my opinion, the good sounds Alexander II laid down till 1881 was weakened by Nicholas II and he missed the opportunity to save Czardom because Russian reforms were resorted to repressive measures again in 1905. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    ' Did Alexander II deserve the title Tsar Liberator

    5 star(s)

    The peasants were 'given' land at a heavy 49 years' redemption, the peasants were tied to their land until they were paid for. Also, the peasants were not allowed to leave the Mir, which was created to oversee redemption payments and share out the land equitably.

  2. How successful were the reforms carried out by Alexander II in the second half ...

    In late 1861, Alexandre II established a committee of jurists to investigate the general principles of legal reforms. This reform was only successful to a small extent. The committee identified 25 defects in the existing system and proposed a number of radical solutions.

  1. Does Alexander II deserve the title of 'Tsar liberator'?

    However, it can be suggested that Alexander?s motives to emancipate the serfs are somewhat questionable. One of Alexander?s more permissible motives was that the serfs were holding Russia back economically and the country was struggling financially and industrially. Historian Victor Serge states that, ?From 1840 onwards, the need for serious

  2. Henry II (1154 - 1189) is generally seen as the main catalyst in the ...

    Subsequently, under Criminal law, it was the King who would have sole jurisdiction over everyone, including members of church and serfs. This in practice meant that the English Kings ultimate authority over all members of his realm and power to over see all cases that royal justice system wanted to achieve.

  1. How Successful Were the Reforms of Alexander II?

    These reforms were successful in building Russia a better army. In the Russo-Turkish War of 1877-1878, Russia emerged as the victor as a result of Alexander's army reforms. However, these reforms can also be seen as failing as they made foreign problems facing the Russians much worse.

  2. Itinerant Justices.

    The eyres Probably from the time of Henry 1, royal commissioners were appointed under 'articles of eyre'.

  1. How far do you agree that Alexander II brought successful reform to Russia?

    However, I feel that Alexander II didn't bring successful reform to Russia even though reform attempts were made. During his reign, Alexander brought about many reforms some successful and others not so. One reform was the Emancipation of the Serfs.

  2. Reasons for Reform - Russia, Alexander II.

    Problems: * The gentry kept 50% of the land and the size of the plots available to the peasants was decided by commissioners. * Peasants had to buy land they had previously farmed and considered to be theirs. They lost between 20% and 40% of this land in 'cut offs'.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work