• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare the Relative Importance of Political Leadership, Military Skill and Resources as reasons for the Outcome of the American Civil War.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Compare the Relative Importance of Political Leadership, Military Skill and Resources as reasons for the Outcome of the American Civil War The American Civil war was the bloodiest conflict in American history, with some 620,000 Americans to die in the four-year conflict. This 'inevitable conflict' as William Seward a politician named the great animosity between the Union and the Confederacy, was the result of years of antagonism, due mainly to the particular institution of slavery. There are numerous reasons for the defeat of the South in the civil war. The main factors to consider for each side, when examining why the Confederate lost the civil war were are, political leadership, military skill, and resources. Political leadership is the most important reason why the South lost the American Civil war. Jefferson Davis was the president of the Confederacy. Davis was reluctant to accept the role of president, however compared with Abraham Lincoln the president of the Union; Davis was better qualified to lead a nation at war. Lincoln had an easier task than Jefferson Davis. ...read more.

Middle

However this proved difficult when the Union cleverly placed a blockade on all the Southern ports, which prevented ships leaving and entering. To surmount the problem of not enough weapons and also the problem of little specie, the Richmond government begin printing its own paper money. This was another step to independence from the central government, but also a bid to increase the amount of specie. Due to lack of proper management, inevitable inflation soon hit 7000%. There was no regulation on the printing of money and so there was eventually too much in the Confederacy. This caused a great problem for the Southern people and greatly lowered morale. The North however faced no such problem, as they had a very well organised finance department within the government. By 1862 the Union had developed efficient management of the Union economy and the flow of military supply. With well over half of the nation's railways and combined with the sufficient resources to optimise the use it appeared in North victory was inevitable. The South did have a third of the nation's railway mileage, but it didn't have the resources let alone the workers to optimise this potential transport. ...read more.

Conclusion

The South having applied this style of warfare would have eroded the Northern will to fight. The main reason why the Confederacy neglected the West was the poor organisation of the military departments. The West was an extensive terrain, which favoured the North who had greater resources and organisation. If however the Confederacy had attempted to defend the West then this would of left the most important industrial state Virginia open to attack. The fact that the South decided to concentrate its efforts on the most important states and not the west probably helped the South to survive against the North for the four years it did. Overall the Southern defeat by the North was due mainly to the lack of resources. The South with the challenge of starting a government from scratch and sustaining a war against a well established government (Union) did surprisingly well to survive for four years, against the Union. Davis the leader of the Confederacy did sustain the Confederate cause for four years even if the aim of ultimate independence was not achieved the eventual reconstruction period did greatly consider states' rights and the people. Laura Curnock 5/10/2007 I ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. "The main cause of the American civil war was undeniably slavery". Assess the ...

    Some historians have blamed 'blundering politicians' as a cause to the Civil War, implying that it was not inevitable. Avery Craven states, "War was the breakdown in the democratic system...caused by the mistakes and failures...of political leaders and opinion makers in both sections".

  2. Why did the South lose the American Civil War?

    It is clear that both sides made blunders so it is unlikely that poor military leadership played a large part in the Confederacy losing. It has been argued that lack of will on the part of the Confederacy played an important role in the South losing the war.

  1. Vietnam - reasons the US lost the war.

    Johnson canceled them knowing that Ho Chi Minh would win majority of votes. Eventually this made Ho Chi Minh angry which formed the Vietcong. The Vietcong was the army supported by Ho Chi Minh to fight another war against the South who supported the United States.

  2. To what extent was the Civil War the main factor in the Bolshevik

    incentives to produce more output as they could make a profit and now keep it. Russian civilians seemed to be content with all these changes and these uprisings stopped. "The New Economic Policy (NEP) produced its first positive results in the spring of 1921.

  1. Analysis of Political Cartoons

    a view that this fluid, contingent shift has come to a definitive point, with the emergence of China leading to a transformation in geopolitical hegemonic discourse. This geopolitical view that the West and particularly America (the driving force behind liberal democracy and neo-liberalism)

  2. Was the civil warinevitable?

    the vital instrument of compromise was neglected by a "blundering generation"5 in the events leading up to the Civil War. The theory of a "blundering generation" holds validity to an extent. However this very theory in itself destroys the idea that the war was a "repressible" conflict, for, it only

  1. Analyse and Discuss the Reasons Behind the Breakdown in the Relationship Between the United States a

    The UK had been pushed to the brink by the efforts required to sustain the Second World War; and was virtually bankrupt. Most European countries were in a similar if not worse position, if action was not taken to rectify the financial and economic situation as a matter of extreme

  2. American History.

    Woodward (1819), which protected contracts against state interference. - The concept of the corporation also emerged through federal and state court rulings: corporations, groups allowed to hold property and do business as if they were individuals, were allowed to sell shares where the shareholders were granted limited liability [no responsibility in company's debt beyond original investment].

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work