• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Consider the relative importance of the British contribution to World War One compared with the French, Russian and American contributions.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Consider The Relative Importance Of The British Contribution To World War One Compared With The French, Russian And American Contributions. The results and consequences of World War I forever changed the 20th century in a way that the world had not expected. With ruins and deaths, as well as social change, World War I changed the worlds' outlook on European nations. The death toll of the wars fought in the previous one-hundred years did not touch the amount of deaths that resulted in World War I. Nearly ten million soldiers were lost in the four years that encompassed the war, and there were nearly twenty-one million men that were wounded. With these deaths came the mass destruction of land all across Europe. The fighting destroyed factories, farms, bridges, and railroad tracks. Due to artillery shells, chemical weapons, and trenches, the Western Front became barren. Military Strength Britain had a peacetime strength of 190,000 men and a colonial strength of 248,000 people. It had a wartime strength of 160,000 men in 1914. The total (army and naval) military personnel as a percentage of the population was 1.17% in 1913/14. Britain had a population of 46 million people and a colonial population of 434 million people where 6.430 million men were of military age of which only 248,000 were trained professionals equivalent to approximately 4-8 percent. ...read more.

Middle

The industrial strength of Russia was extremely weaker than the Central and Allied powers. She produced 36million tons of coal, 4million tons of iron and 4million tons of steel compared to 277million tons of coal, 15 million tons of iron and 14miullion tons of steel of Germany, or 292mmillion tons of coal, 11milliomn tons of iron and 6.5million tons of steel of Britain. Russia's expenditure was increasing from 1914/15 to 1916/17. However, it decreased in 1917/18. it was $1.239 in 1914/15, $3.18 in 1915/16 and $4.585million and in 1916/17, it decreased to $2.774million, the total expenditure worth $11,778million. France had 40million tons of coal, but had only 5million tons of iron and 35million tons of steels, which was quite low. France's expenditure was increasing throughout the war. In 1914/15, they spent$1.994million, in 1915/16, $3.827million, in 1916.17, $6.227million, in 1917/18, $7.74 million and in 1918/19, $10.16million giving a total of $30,009million, the third largest amount of the Central and Allied powers, showing that France was fully stretched in terms of economic power. France borrowed money from Britain and USA, while lending money to Russia and other countries. A higher level of external finance certainly helped Britain and France to spend more on waging war than Germany and Austria-Hungary. USA............................................................................................................ Analysis of the contribution of each country The contribution made in 1914 In 1914, Britain made the largest contribution out of all the Allies, even though it was quite small. ...read more.

Conclusion

The U.S armaments continued to be vital to the Allies. . U.S shipbuilding was vital to overcome losses of merchant ships to German U Boats. The contributions made in 1918 In 1918 Britain made the largest contribution between the Allies. The Hindenburg line was the strongest German defensive position. This line helped in the German Spring Offensive but Britain managed to stop it. Britain had captured more German prisoners than France and America put together this year. Britain were still dependent on U.S loans. Britain was the main cause for the defeat of the German Allies (Bulgaria, Austria-Hungary and Turkey). Britain had mobilised 5,680,247 in the army. They made an economic contribution of $12,611,000,000 this year. In 1918 France still had more men on the Western front than America, Britain and France put together because they needed each other to survive the German Spring Offensive. France made the second largest contribution this year. They made an economic contribution of $10,166,000,000 this year. In the middle of 1918 U.S.A had around 3,000,000 men in Europe but they were inexperienced. They launched their first major attack at Argonne in September 1918. The significance of this was that it lifted the Allied powers morale greatly. They made the largest economic contribution as well as lending huge loans to France and Britain. By the end of 1918 U.S.A was the leading nation. In the last two years the U.S.A contributed a total of $35,731,000,000 which was more than all the allies. 1 Hasan Khizar History Coursework ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Explain how the Schlieffen Plan was meant to work?

    The generals had no reason to despise Haig because they weren't the one which had to carry out his order, 'going over the top'; generals did not fight in the front line so they did not know what it was like for the soldiers.

  2. Why did tension increase in Europe between 1900 and 1914?

    to Italy taking the Adriatic coast of the Balkans as far south as Albania and also some the islands of the coast of Greece. This would allow Italy to develop a new empire in an area of Europe where there was no great power.

  1. Women and social change - To what extent did World War One effect womens ...

    The right of workers to organize was relatively new, about half a century. Employers fought to keep union organizers out of their plants and armed force was often used against striking workers. The universal rallying of workers towards their flag at the beginning of the war led to wider acceptance of unions.

  2. “Evaluate the relative importance of imperialism, the arms’ race and the failure of diplomacy ...

    In Germany this development was known as Weltpolitik4 and later became the term used to describe the overseas expansionism that European leaders sought to achieve. These ideas became stronger in the 20th century and drove the European powers into several conflicts.

  1. American History.

    gov't the power to build roads/canals]. - Congress viewed the plan as a way of unifying the country, and most of the program was enacted in 1816: the Second Back of the United States was chartered, the Tariff of 1816 was passed, and funds were appropriated for the extension of

  2. Total War, Britain during the Second World War

    It was one example of many of Hitler interfering in matters that he knew little about. The RAF had also bombed Berlin for the first, which Goering, the head of the Luftwaffe, had said would never happen. The switch to bombing London was by way of reprisal.

  1. 'Propaganda Was an Essential Weapon In the War Against Germany’ - To ...

    The reason why the person who persuades the man to go to war is depicted as a woman in many pictures is because women are the natural companions of men, husband-wife, and brother-sister. An example of this is the poster 'Women of Britain say-Go!'

  2. How And Why Did Britain Survive The War From 1940-1943?

    Realising that there was no way that Britain wanted peace, Hitler ordered her invasion. The planned date for invasion Sealion was 15th September 1940. The problem for the German army was that this would be like no battle so far as it would not just be a case of crossing

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work