• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Constitutional Crisis 1909

Extracts from this document...


How Successful Was The Liberal Party In Dealing With The Constitutional Crisis of 1909-11? The Constitutional Crisis of 1909 was essentially a feud between the newly elected Liberals and the House of Commons, against the old leaders, the Conservatives who had the help of the House of Lords. The Liberals, who had been voted in during the 1906 general election, had broken a stranglehold the Conservatives had had on Britain for over 50 years, and wished to introduce the foundations of a welfare state. The Conservatives however, had other ideas, and set out to make sure the Liberals did not succeed in changing the way they had run the country for the last half century. This reaction policy is what sparked a political war between the two parties. The 1909 People's Budget was the Liberal Governments key weapon in instigating social reform and marked a final move away from the system of Gladstonian finance, which had seen the Liberals traditionally associated with retrenchment in government expenditure and an emphasis on self-help. With its radical plans to redistribute the burden of tax and finance social provisions, such as old age pensions, the Budget was swiftly rejected by the landed majority in the House of Lords, sparking the first constitutional crisis of the twentieth century. ...read more.


As the Commons were able to show a majority for the Budget, endorsed by an election, the Lords at last agreed to pass the budget. However their overall political position was weakened as they were now in dependant on the Irish Nationalists, who were determined to achieve Home Rule, an issue which was highly controversial amongst politicians and the British public alike. This issue was very difficult to resolve and with hindsight would drag on for a very long time to come. On the other hand, although the Conservatives had reclaimed the majority of the seats they had lost in the 1906 elections, the Liberals still won an important moral victory over the Lords and Conservative opposition. Politically the budget was also of high importance as it allowed the Commons to achieve a lasting victory of the House of Lords. The second Constitutional Crisis came over the Parliament Act of 1911. The Liberals were determined that the House of Lords should never again block a measure passed by the House of Commons. In 1910, they therefore drew up a bill to curb the power of the House of Lords by taking away its power of veto. The 1910 Parliament Bill proposed that the House of Lords was to have no power to amend or reject those bills that the speaker of the Commons certified to be true money bills. ...read more.


However the passing of the Parliament Act was in some terms a great success as it ensured British constitution was more democratic and never again could the Lords permanently override the Commons and therefore political power had shifted decisively to the lower house. For example, there had never been a British Prime Minister sitting in the Lords since this date. There was also to be more frequent elections as the span of a government was reduced from 7 to 5 years, this meant the public would vote on who they wanted in government more often which meant a party could not develop such a long stint in power without having the full backing of the majority. In conclusion, I feel the Liberal Party were not very successful throughout the Constitutional Crisis (1909-11) because although they won both elections involved and therefore passed the Budget of 1909 and the Parliament Act of 1911 and I also agree that the Liberals were successful in containing the constitutional crises however they became two dependant on other parties and this left them vulnerable to being 'exploited'. They should therefore be deemed as unsuccessful as they lost over 100 seats since their 'landslide' victory of 1906, and also because they only managed scrape a majority in the two elections because of heavy dependency on the Irish Nationalists and the Labour Party. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Why did the House of Lords reject the 1909 Budget

    Balfour was of the opinion that "the great unionist party should still control whether in government or opposition". In 1906, the Liberals' Education Bill was so mutilated by the Lords that it had to be abandoned. Other Liberal measures blocked by the Lords were a Scottish Land Bill, the Abolition of Plural Voting Bill and the Licensing Bill of 1908.

  2. How Successful was Edward Carson in His Defense of Unionism During The Third Home ...

    The conservatives were determined to fight this but were met with a problem when Lord Lansdowne had been told that the King was prepared to create the necessary liberal peers. (Rees, 1998, p. 147) This then created a spilt in the conservatives, the ?hedgers? who would not vote against legislation

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work