• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Contrast The Contribution Made By Mazzini, Cavour and Garibaldi to Italian Unification

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Contrast The Contribution Made By Mazzini, Cavour The unification of Italy was a complicated process that started from the 1790s and lasted until the conquest of Rome by the Italian troops in 1871. The Napoleonic Era, however, did not forecast such an outcome of things: at the beginning of the XIX century Italy consisted of separate states that were ruled first by the French, then by the Austrians who did not think about the unity. The 1820s and 1830s signalized the urging need of Italy to change ? people missed the partial freedom that Napoleon gave them and wanted to participate in governing, which was impossible as long as Austria held so much influence within the peninsula. The revolutions of 1820-1 (Piedmont) and 1831-2 (Papal States) showed the citizens that a change is possible. The revolution of 1848 and 1849 gave more hope to the Italian patriots all over the country, for they saw that Milan was able to hold back Austria for some time and for Piedmont was beginning to gain the position of a leader within the States. The shrewd policies of the Piedmontese government and the significant conquests at the South of the Peninsula led to the creation of The Kingdom of Italy in 1861 and then connection of Rome and Venetia. ...read more.

Middle

After 1849 he supported Garibaldi in his attempts to conquer Rome but his role in the unification was coming to the end. The contribution made by Giuseppe Garibaldi was a military one. He engaged himself into the Unification in 1833 when he joined the Young Italy inspired by the idea of an united Italian state. As Mazzini, after the failure in Piedmont in 1834 he escaped to South America. What s important, the time spent by Garibaldi in America was not a wasted period: he learned how to fight at the land, because before, due to his marine origins, he was used to fight on a ship. Like Mazzini, he also gained an important political feature that was recognition in America. When he heard of the planned revolutions during the Spring of Nations, he came back to his motherland with a guerilla called the Red Shirts and helped Mazzini with defending Rome. The actions of Garibaldi were not successful, due to the fact that he was not fully educated in terms of militia and war and once again he fled to America to come back in 1854 and take part in an Austro-Piedmontese war. ...read more.

Conclusion

He even had a conflict with Mazzini: they both disliked each other and did not try to understand the other?s position. He stood in opposition to the figures of nationalists and their ideas. When it came to military actions, Cavour was not taking part with them, he only planned them and as a Prime Minister did accept some military decisions or did not ? for example the decision of taking part in the Crimean War. As a long and complicated process, the Unification of Italy needed the devotion of many people, but it was also in need of leaders that would make the right decision at the right time and be aware of the consequences. Although the contribution made by Garibaldi, Mazzini and Cavour were not equal, together they built an important base for the future of a united Italy. They actions were often ambiguous, but each one of them was the most important person in one field: Mazzini ideologically, spreading the spirit of nationalism all over the country and making attempts to unite the state; Garibaldi militarily, defending Rome, conquering the South and showing the people that victory is not possible; Cavour politically, rationally planning every step of Piedmont and giving up his aims for the greater good. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

4 star(s)

This is a knowledgeable response which devotes equal weighting to each of the three figures and uses comparison to explore their strengths. There is a strong amount of detail throughout, although sometimes the author's points are weakened by poor grammar; proof-reading is essential. 4 out of 5 stars.

Marked by teacher Natalya Luck 22/05/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Why did the League of Nations fail?

    5 star(s)

    The League's predicament was as follows; Britain, France and Italy had formed the Stresa Front in 1935 against Hitler, and this acted as dissuasion against any serious sanctions. In reality, it would have been very easy for Britain to stop Mussolini if they had starved him of oil.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Major Causes of French Revolution

    4 star(s)

    They were not used to paying taxes and were not about to start. Calonne's plans of reform three main elements. Firstly came the economic and administrative reforms designed to fix once and for all the structural problems troubling the royal finances.

  1. Marked by a teacher

    How successful were Nazi economic policies in the years 1933-45?

    4 star(s)

    Hitler issued a series of war decrees in December 1939 outlining vast programmes for every possible aspect of war production; this meant that German military expenditure doubled between 1939 and 1941. Food rationing was also introduced and the German labor force was rapidly mobilized for war through the majority being involved in war-related projects.

  2. What impact did war have on the French Revolution 1789-1799?

    In order to crush resistance to the policies of Total War, levee en masse and requisitioning - introduced to prevent more economic crises, the Revolutionary Tribunals, Representatives-on-mission and surveillance committees were put in place to keep order and crush uprisings.

  1. Assess the reasons why opposition to Russian Governments was rarely successful in the period ...

    Having been mostly dormant under Tsardom, international opposition had come to the forefront following the 1917 revolutions. Britain and France, already opposed to Russian withdrawal from the Entente, were among several nations who intervened in the civil war on the side of the Whites, however their withdrawal in 1920 was

  2. How Successful was Napoleon III's Domestic Policy?

    the Empire as well as providing a huge amount of employment for the urban working class. The work of Baron H was a substantial milestone in the development of Modern France and the project benefitted both the working class and middle class in terms of social and economic attributes, better

  1. How stable was the Weimar Republic 1924-29 ?

    Also, Hindenburg being elected, though it was a good choice, became the focus of powerful groups who wanted a more authoritarian system which went against the Republic causing uncertainty and instability in the government. Economically, inflation was cured in 1924 and never was to return.

  2. The Holocaust was the result of Hitlers long held grand design to pursue a ...

    Panel - Pedro Berruguete, 15th century. Note the non-heretical book floating above the fire The image above was painted in the 15th Century by the Spanish painter Pedro Berruguete. Although the image was painted some time after the even occurred such prints were popular tin the 15th century and the image clearly justifies the existence of strong anti-Semitism pre-Nazi Germany and in the Middle Ages.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work