• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Could The Division Of Germany Been Avoided In 1949?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Could The Division Of Germany Been Avoided In 1949? In 1949, Germany was divided into two opposing states, the Eastern Bloc and the Western Bloc. There are many contrasting views on whether the division could have been avoided or not. One view is that the division was caused by the America, and its methods to try to make Europe economically like itself and if the division was done to build a separate Western state, to contain communism. However the opposing view is that, the Berlin Blockade, was just the USSR's way of acting in defence of America and its "threatening" goals. Also the conclusion could come to the idea that many American actions, such as the creation of NATO was done to protect itself as Stalin's foreign policy seemed like a genuine threat. Therefore I will be examining arguments and coming to a general conclusion of whether or not the division of Germany could or could not have been avoided in 1949. In order to come to this conclusion, you need to examine the events that led up to the division and if they could or could not have been avoided. Firstly, in December 15th 1947, the break up of London Foreign Ministers Conference occurred. At this time, it was unlikely that any agreement on Germany was possible. ...read more.

Middle

To fuel the argument that the blame was mostly on the Soviets fault, was the Consolidation of the Eastern Bloc. By June 1948, the Cominform was used as a powerful weapon to control the Soviet Bloc. Even though it seemed that each state in the Bloc was, "independent", they all had to have the same culture, military, social and economic policies. This was hardly a state of "independence". Therefore, there was no more diversity in Eastern Europe, as there was before. Communists seized power in Czechoslovakia and strengthened their power in Hungary. Furthermore, a Peoples Independence Front was set up in the elections in May 1949 and the Communist party controlled it. Only properly approved candidates could run, not anyone else. Gomulka wanted a socialist society that would reflect how Poland was really like was forced to resign in August and then put in jail. This can show how the USA was right, that the USSR just wanted to spread its communism and it can be said that the USA actions in the division were acceptable to contain communism. After all they didn't want to stop entirely communism, just contain it to areas that Stalin controlled, such as the USSR. What power did the USSR have to impose its policies on others? ...read more.

Conclusion

Also, Stalin's attempts to force the West into his way of thinking, or even reconsidering, just made dividing Germany a faster process, therefore, it can be said that there was no other way than to create that East German state. It seems that the division of Germany and Europe was going to happen. However, even if Stalin got his way, its unlikely that, if Stalin got his way, that Germany would remain, truly a genuine independent and neutral country ((reference to Peoples Independence Front). Voices from America and London, showed that it was obvious that most of the Western Europeans preferred a divided Germany and a West Europe that was protected by American military presence. Therefore, even if Stalin was scared of USA actions, he still used force to try and get his way in the Berlin Blockade, an undiplomatic way of thinking. The division was inevitable, it would happen eventually, as the allies just had clearly different aims, the USSR wanted one thing while the USA and Britain wanted another. Stalin would have wanted to spread Communism and the West tried to stop it. Actions by America provoked responses by Soviets, which then provoked further actions by America. It was a vicious cycle. George Keenan and General Robertson may believe there were alternatives to the partition of Germany, but I believe it was inevitable. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Historical Periods section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Historical Periods essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Extended Essay: Bismarck and The Unification of Germany

    5 star(s)

    By making the tales available to all Germans, ideas spread this brought the states closer together. The view that the German states should join together was expressed in books, newspapers and magazines. One place where these views really caught on was in the universities.

  2. Why Did The Wartime Alliance Break Down?

    Furthermore, another reason contributing to the breakdown of the alliance is the Polish Question. At Yalta, the decision of what to do with Poland was of great importance, because Poland was the largest country in Eastern Europe. Each leader had a different idea of what to do with Poland.

  1. South African Heritage - Where we come from?

    In what ways has the material in this section on paleontology changed your ideas about South African heritage? The material in this section has changed my views about South African heritage because I had no idea that South Africa had such a rich and vast source of fossils!

  2. The cult of Stalin and the purges of the 1930(TM)s were two aspects of ...

    of the NKVD (secret police), tried and executed.[3][4] As a result of Kirov's death and the betrayal Stalin had encountered during the period surrounding the assassination, Stalin began enforcing the 'great purges'. The first phase began in 1935 and was devised to rid the Party of any political opponents or threats.

  1. A direct comparison of the role of central power and control during the late ...

    However the implementation of such a plan under the control of one man was overly ambitious, hence the establishment of Gosplan, still a centrally run and controlled body. Under Khrushchev the Sovnarkhozy, 105 regional economic councils, saw power spread much more countrywide.

  2. The structures of the Soviet State were created by Lenin and abused by Stalin. ...

    core, and utterly devoid of ethical sentiments".7 Other Centre-Left to Socialist historians judge Lenin less harshly and believe Stalin's policies as discontinuing those of Lenin's. Stephen F. Cohen, when talking about Leninist Bolshevism and Stalinism said: "they were two radically different phenomena".8 Stalin's use of fear-mongering ("the use of fear

  1. In the context of India in the 1840s to 1947, how far can independence ...

    The Indian police force, army and civil service would now be half owned by Indians. But ?in the temper of the 1930?s the Act received a frigid reception In India.?[25] This was because the act was ?hedged with too many safeguards, checks and balances,?[26] so there was never complete ruling responsibility for the provinces.

  2. Notes on Cleopatra and her links with Rome

    The Egyptians thereafter asserted their fighting ability in uprisings against their Greek masters (there were at least 10 revolts between 245 BC and 50 BC). After 203 BC, with the reign of Ptolemy V, the empire dissipated. The Ionian islands were lost as was Coele Syria, regained after marriage of

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work