• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Describe How Henry VII Was Able To Take the Throne In 1485 &Middot; His Upbringing and Experience In Brittany.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Describe how Henry VII was able to take the throne in 1485 * His upbringing and experience in Brittany. * The reign of Richard III. * The legacy of the Wars of the Roses. * The invasion, march and battle. * The support of the Nobility. Henry was born as the son of Edmund Tudor and Margaret Beaufort. He spent most of his youth in his home country of Wales. Following the accession of Edward IV in 1471, Henry fled abroad to Brittany because he was the only Lancastrian claimant left. Hence this would have been a strong position for Henry because he would have gained the support of many Lancastrian's. Henrys upbringing was of crucial importance in enabling him to take the throne. In Brittany he was trained up in the courts and not as a king. ...read more.

Middle

It made the monarchy unstable and the crown changed hands five times in less than twenty-five years. The marriage of Henry and Elizabeth united the two sides and from here the Tudor age began. Generally peace was made between the two sides which would be useful if Henry made it to the throne. France and Britain had always been traditional enemies and the French wanted any opportunity to cause a civil war in England. Henry gained much support and also the use of armed forces. Doreen Digs Bury's comments "Without French support it is unlikely that Henry would have had the resources at his disposal sufficient to launch a realistic invasion of England". Henry would have had to repay the French for the support they lent him, but this support was vital for him to be able to consider a realistic invasion of England. ...read more.

Conclusion

Support of the nobility itself was crucial in order to gain and remain upon the throne. Nobles each had their own private army. Without the support of nobles life could be very difficult. Many nobles disliked Richard III and were sympathetic to the cause of Henry. In the months leading up to the battle of Bosworth Field, Henry and Jasper Tudor gained the support of many influential nobles. The actions of the Stanley's prove how important this was. The key factors of Henry's rise to the throne were therefore -his gain of supporters, the continued loyalty of his fellow friends and family- (Margaret Beaufort, Jasper Tudor, John de Vere-the biggest landowner and leader of the Lancastrian's and Edward Woodville). Also the support of the Stanley's, the events listed and the general unpopularity of Richard III played very crucial parts in him becoming king. . ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. How Did Henry VII Manage to Secure the Throne After 1485?

    When Henry became king he dated the official start of his reign before the battle of Bosworth. He could therefore call Richard's supporters in the battle traitors have then executed for treason. Before Henry had been on the throne for one whole year there were minor risings.

  2. Discuss Shakespeare's presentation of women in Richard III. Are they convincing characters?

    And he's gone. CHILDREN: What stay had we Clarence? And he's gone. DUCHESS: What stays had i but they? And they are gone. ELIZABETH: Was never widow had so dear loss. CHILDREN: Were never orphans had so dear loss. The three of a kind demonstrated adds power to the ritual.

  1. How effective was Richard III as a king from 1483 - 1485?

    This meant that no one noble was given extreme power, thus limiting opposition to the crown. However, there is an equal amount of evidence suggesting that Richard III was an ineffective king. Although some aspects of his domestic government were strong, as explained in the previous paragraph, his foreign policy was largely unsuccessful.

  2. How Strong Was Henry VII's Position On The Throne In 1485?

    When the Wars of the Roses commenced, one by one the Lancastrian claimants died, and the crown passed to the House of York. Edward IV had Henry VI and his son Prince Edward executed, and scared for his life, Henry and his uncle Jasper fled to exile in Brittany.

  1. This essay examines the actions of Charles VII in relation to events pertaining to ...

    Since she was so beloved by the public, many historians feel that Charles feared her intentions. At the peak of her success she was potentially able to do anything without the fear of facing any consequences. Although speculative, several historians believe Charles suffered from psychological neuroses including paranoia.7 Such paranoia

  2. Why did Henry VII win in 1485?

    sons in the twin towers, although this was never proven. In becoming King, Richard split his own side (Yorkists) and began to spread rumours about his claim to the throne and about his brothers claim to the throne. This may have also made him less popular as Edward IV was

  1. Explain why Henry Tudor was successful in usurping the English Throne in 1485.

    However, in 1489 Herbert was executed and Henry regained power, forcing Henry Tudor into a vulnerable position as the main other Lancastrian claimant to the throne. Giving Henry the opportunity to escape capture, Jasper Tudor safely removed his nephew from England and he and Henry remained in exile in France for fourteen years.

  2. Why was Henry Tudor able to overthrow Richard III?

    Richard's character, although we cannot be sure due to nearly all sources being affected by Tudor myth, was a deceitful one and reactions to him, shown by the immediate acceptance of Henry Tudor, can be seen as being negative. The nature of his usurpation shows him to be a strong

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work