• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Describe Italy's invasion of Abyssinia in 1935-6 and what the League of Nations did about it.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Describe Italy's invasion of Abyssinia in 1935-6 and what the League of Nations did about it. During the years of 1935 and 1936 Italy had a new ruler, Benito Mussolini. Mussolini wanted and empire in Eastern Africa. For there had already been disputes of Ethiopia and the Italian Somaliland in Africa and during 1930-35 Italian soldiers had been killed by Abyssinians on the border. Mussolini thought that would be the perfect to attack and Abyssinia would mean a fairly easy victory and that he will have his empire that little bit sooner. ...read more.

Middle

Once they retreated the Abyssinia leader, Haile Selassie went to the League of Nations for help. The League had failed to help when they where last asked for assistance. This was when Manchuria needed aid when Japan was threatening to attack and did in 1931. The league had to keep to a strict plan and needed to impose moral sanctions upon Italy. This is when the country attacking is reminded of the covenant they signed and is asked to back down. ...read more.

Conclusion

Britain and France the most powerful countries in the league didn't want to upset Mussolini for Hitler was coming to power at that time and if Mussolini was an ally of Britain and France that would be a good weapon against Germany. As they did not want to offend Mussolini the league also refused to close to Suez canal. This was meant for Italian shipping but could also be used to transport troops. This lead to Abyssinia to be under more pressure. The Suez runs between Sinai and Egypt, and from the Mediterranean to the Red sea and is controlled by the British and French. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Why did the League of Nations fail?

    5 star(s)

    It had failed also to stop the Japanese invasion of Manchuria or the start of the Greek-Bulgarian war. Collective security had been a pleasant theory as well. On paper, it appeared infallible. In practice it proved to be almost as effective as moral force.

  2. "The League of Nations representedno more than

    All the leaders were simply bypassing the league, or they were using the league for their own national interests. "There was a tendency for nations to conduct their diplomacy outside the League of Nations and to put their trust in paper treaties.

  1. A Night to remember - Invincible. That was the sole word in the English ...

    My anticipation of battle also died down, my hands felt the epitome of unsteadiness. By the time of the scarlet, shimmering sun set I had as much enthusiasm for war as the soldiers of the First World War just before going over the top and after having seen their comrades hacked to pieces by a mesh of machineguns.

  2. Why was the league so ineffective in dealing with the Abyssinian Crisis?

    Abyssinia would be split up with Italy getting the fertile lands and a large area to the south would be reserved for Italian economic advancement. Neither Italy nor Abyssinia was involved in these "talks". These "talks" were then leaked to the press.

  1. Why did the League of Nations fail in the 1930s?

    Tensions increased after the failure of the Conference, and countries began to start to increase their weapons stockpiles at very fast rate. Because the representatives could not come to a decision about disarmament, the Conference failed. The majority were never serious about disarming anyway, and saw the Conference as a mere formality.

  2. How far do David Low’s cartoons show the reasons for the failure of the ...

    Even so people were willing to give the plan a try, under the hope that no country would dare invade another knowing that the USA and other powerful countries would stop trading with them or send force in to stop them.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work