• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Describe the developments in the power struggle in the USSR in the year 1924-27, following the death of Lenin.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Describe the developments in the power struggle in the USSR in the year 1924-27, following the death of Lenin. After the death of Lenin in 1924 the power struggle for Russia began. Through much bad health Lenin had a lot of time to think who would be his succeeder. However Lenin recommended nobody in his testament. Although it was evident that most knew that the struggle was between just two men. Stalin and Trotsky. These men had both been prominent in the party throughout its success in revolutionising Russia in 1917. The men were both very different and played different roles. Stalin was more politically prominent. He was a member of the Politbureau and appeared close to Lenin. Trotsky was key in the revolution and was very militarily prominent amongst the party. He was the man who organised the revolution and the leader of the red army. Early on Trotsky appeared to be somewhat more powerful than Stalin. ...read more.

Middle

Stalin had obviously planned this method as prior to Lenin's death he spent much time with him and spent more time with him than any other Bolshevik. Stalin manipulated this further by producing pictures where he was always photographed next to Lenin, and often Trotsky had been edited out of the photographs. Trotsky failed to take such actions as Stalin, and struggled to gain a power base to oppose Stalin from. Lenin had published in his testament that his preferred succeeder would be Trotsky, however he failed to capitalise on this. This was due to the fact that on several key occasions Trotsky was severely infected with malaria, which affected his ability to do anything. Trotsky also wasn't very politically able and this disadvantaged him. Trotsky wasn't liked amongst the party. He was seen to be intellectually arrogant which most members hated. He was also an ex-Menshevik and wasn't trusted by some. ...read more.

Conclusion

Following this Trotsky began to criticise Kamenev and Zinoviev as 'October Deserters'. This provoked Stalin to invent 'Trotskyism' which portrayed Trotsky negatively. His unpopular ideas were fitted under this title such as rapid industrialisation, permanent revolution and his Menshevik traits. Trotsky was finished and dropped out of sight playing a minor role in Government. Following this Stalin turned on his allies Kamenev and Zinoviev for agreeing with Trotsky's ideas that the NEP should have been rejected. He used his control of the press to exploit that they believed in Trotskyism. At the 14th Party Congress Stalin won with a large majority. Trotsky now allied with Zinoviev and Kamenev attempted one last attack on Stalin stating that he was 'gravedigging the revolution.' However just as Stalin was being pushed, Zinoviev and Kamenev fell apart in the party and lost any power. Trotsky had no other support and was forced to back down. Following this Trotsky was expelled from the party. He was also exiled from Russia. Stalin now had total power. ?? ?? ?? ?? Sam James 05/10/07 History Page 1 of 2 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Compare the Characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin

    By 1941 there was a 400% increase in industrial production, how genuine these statistics are however is debatable because farmers gave false figures to avoid being sent away to labour camps. In the long run, Stalin increased agricultural production and increased the average farmers wage considerably, but between 1932 and

  2. How effective was Lenin at establishing control in Russia between 1917 and 1924?

    As the Provisional Government had lost support and had few loyal troops left, it was quite easy for the Bolsheviks to seize power. All the key points in Petrograd were taken over and the guns of the Navy ship 'Aurora' were pointed on the home of the Provisional Government, the Winter Palace.

  1. The enormous role that Trotsky played in the success of the Bolsheviks up until ...

    They were known as 'the Whites'. The first big problem was that whilst the Whites had an army the Bolsheviks, or 'the Reds' did not. Having proven himself as a clever and tactical military leader, Trotsky was made chairman of the supreme war council by Lenin.

  2. Links between the two regimes of Lenin and Stalin.

    He called collectivisation a "military operation... a cruel civil war"16. The experiment to place 150 million peasants into 200, 000 kolkhozy was a "piece of prodigious insanity, in which all rules of logic and principles of economics were turned upside down"17 and he clearly stipulated that "Stalin undertook to drive barbarism out of Russia by barbarous means"18.

  1. How important was war in Lenin's securing and consolidation of power in the USSR.

    However, Lenin used the influence he still had to escape back to Finland in disguise. During Kornilovs putsch in September 1917, Kerensky was in an impossible situation. Kornilovs army looked like winning, and Kerensky had to choose to surrender or turn to the only people that could help him, The Bolsheviks, in the Petrograd Soviet.

  2. Following the death of Lenin on 22nd January 1924, Stalin, 'man of steel', rose ...

    now becoming more noticed by the people and he was getting some respect, which he eventually used to help him rise to power. If Stalin was to be leader of the USSR then this meant that Lenin would have to be out the way.

  1. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    When the right opposed this, Stalin removed its leaders from the Politburo. Stalin was now effectively the leader of the USSR. Why did Stalin come to power? Power struggle about policy not personality for the most part, the direction the USSR should go.

  2. Compare the characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin.

    In dustrial production had fallen disastrously under War Communism. The cities were in chaos. Adding to this that agirculture also collapsed. Grain requestioning had led to low harvests which at the same time led to famine. Evidence which proves that industrial output felled was that in 1913 there was 29 millions of tons of coal and by 1921 it

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work