• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Describe the stages in 1642 by which England slipped into civil war

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Describe the stages in 1642 by which England slipped into civil war In the events leading to 1642 Charles 1st had managed to regain support that he had lost as a result of his '11 years tyranny'. Pym's revolutionary reforms began to shock members of parliament, the 'Grand Remonstrance' had only passed by the narrowest of margins, with nearly 50% of the commons supporting the King. Despite this England fell into a state of civil war on 22nd August 1642 - Charles' radical, ill-advised actions led to many people turning to parliament, having lost the image of a secure leader they had once seen. Henrietta Maria, Charles' catholic wife and his other advisors had encouraged Charles to make a stance against the increasingly radical parliamentary policies. ...read more.

Middle

War was now very likely. Communication between the two sides may have salvaged the situation in January 1642, but all hope of this was lost when Charles left London, moving to York where he had royalist support. Charles also sent his wife and children abroad, sending crown jewels with them, which they were to pawn to raise money for an army. There was now an obvious breakdown in communication, this was another key stage in England coming into war as the two sides seemed to be unable to negotiate a peaceful end easily. Although there were now two clear sides, neither had a large army with which to fight, this would be the next major stage. ...read more.

Conclusion

The West and North took the side of the Royalists (the 'Cavaliers') the East and South supporting Parliament (the 'Roundheads'). Despite both sides taking arms, neither had raised their standard, the King was issued a further chance to prevent war. Parliament issued Charles '19 Propositions', which he was to follow if war was to be stopped. Naturally Charles did not accept this, defending his 'Divine right' and not accepting further movements against him. The navy turned to Parliament, securing their control of the sea, and creating further problems for Charles, as it would hinder his chances of acquiring support from his wife. This final stage had produced no major events towards a settlement, with no chance of a peaceful end with such clearly defined forces the King raised his standard on the 22nd August 1642 in Nottingham. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Why did Civil war break out in 1642?

    Proof to this is when Charles called Parliament, the short Parliament only lasted for three weeks and then he dissolved it. Other proof is in January 1642 when Charles walked into the House of Commons and tried to arrest five MPs on the spot.

  2. The roles and leadership of Charles Stuart and John Pym in the English Civil ...

    So how did Charles act, believing he was not to become King? According to Charles Carlton3 Charles tried to protect himself by being submissive, something which is very rare in an heir, he became withdrawn and always seeking affection. So this was the attitude that Charles felt was appropriate, as

  1. In August 1642 the Civil War began, it was between Parliament and the King ...

    But Charles actions proved to Parliament that he couldn't be trusted. Charles moved out of London to look for support. In 1642 there were arguments about Money, Religion and Power. Some MP's wanted to get rid of Bishops and some wanted to get rid of the Church of England.

  2. What was the most significant cause of civil strife in England from 1455-61?

    An extract from Warren says that 'Any argument that the wars came alone as a direct result of bastard feudalism can be dismissed'. This appears too hasty a conclusion as bastard feudalism had a number of effects on the country which contributed, no matter how little, to the outbreak of civil strife.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work