• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Despite frequent changes in policy, Russian and Soviet governments were spectacularly unsuccessful in securing sustained economic progress in the years 1881-1982. Assess the validity of this statement.

Extracts from this document...


?Despite frequent changes in policy, Russian and Soviet governments were spectacularly unsuccessful in securing sustained economic progress in the years 1881-1982?. Assess the validity of this statement. Between 1981 and 1982, Russia underwent huge changes, particularly the in economy. Russian history is well known for its frequent changes in policy as the country faced revolutions, changes in regime, changes in leadership and not to mention its involvement in various conflicts. As a result, Russia?s economic policy was subject to major change apart from three key areas, industry, agriculture and the tertiary sector. These three areas of the economy remained a constant in its ever changing climate; however, many historians still argue that Russia?s economy was unsuccessful and poorly managed despite its frequent change in policy. Thus begs the question, ?To what extent is this true?? The Tsarist regime, for many Russians, was a period of economic instability as agriculture was seen as a secondary concern. Growth rate was not structured and growth rate fell considerably between the late 1890?s and 1905.[1] Meanwhile, other economies expanded leaving Russia struggling to catch up and some historians see agriculture as a reason for Russia?s economic decline. For example, Carol. S. Leonard argued that Russia?s grain production per capita GDP was lagged far behind that of America in 1913.[2] This argument shows how agriculture in Tsarist Russia wasn?t dealt with effectively and as a result, the economy suffered. ...read more.


It was not just agriculture which suffered. Factories were nationalized by November 1920 and were geared towards war production.[19] Additionally, private trade was banned and rationing was introduced on consumer goods including food and clothing. War communism was, effectively a self destructive policy. Grain requisitioning meant more than three million people died of starvation by late 1922.[20] Moreover, money lost its value and people got by through a system of barter. Inflation shot up and multiplied 1917 costs by four million in 1922. Additionally, in comparison to the growth in city population during the Tsarist regime, people fled the cities. For example; in December 1920 the population in Petrograd fell by 57.5%[21] Lenin knew that it was time for a change. War communism caused more harm then good so Lenin came up with an alternative, the ?New Economic Policy? (NEP). Peasants were allowed to sell grain for profit and they paid tax on what they produced rather than giving it up[22]. Things also changed industrially and in the tertiary sector. Businessmen could own small or medium sized businesses however large firms were still state owned.[23] The NEP basically gave the people of Russia freedom and Lenin hoped that it would boost economic growth as well. However, in 1924, Lenin died and Stalin came to power. Stalin also brought new ideas and his own ways of modernizing the economy. ...read more.


From Inertia to Ferment by Carol. S. Leonard [3] The Penguin History of Modern Russia by Robert Service [4] www.historymadefun.co.uk/Tsarism [5] Overview from Russia and the USSR: Autocracy and Dictatorship (questions and answers in History) by Stephen. J. Lee [6] Stephen J Lee [7] http://www.slideshare.net/russeltarr/tsar-nicholas-ii-and-industry [8] The Industrialisation of Russia by M. Falkus [9] http://www.portalus.ru/modules/english_russia [10] M. Falkus [11] A2 History OCR: A Russia and its Rulers 1855-1964 [12] A2 History OCR [13] S. J Lee [14] A History of the USSR [15] Penguin History of Modern Russia [16] M. Falkus [17] The Making of the Revolution, 1881-1905 [18] From Years of Russia and the USSR, 1851-1991 by Evans and Jenkins [19] Evans and Jenkins [20] The Russian Revolutions 1914-1924 [21] Evans and Jenkins [22] The USSR, Germany and the USA between the wars [23] Russia and the USSR 1905-1941 [24] The USSR, Germany and Russia between the wars [25] A Soviet view of the second five year plan from History of the USSR by Y. Kukushkin [26] Stalin and the Soviet Economy [27] European History 1848-1945 by T.A Morris [28] Everyday Life in Russia by Bertha Malnick [29] AQA A2 History Triumph and Collapse: Russia and the USSR 1941-1991 by John Laver & Sally Waller [30] Russia 1855- 1964 Flagship History by D. Murray and T. Morris [31] The Soviet Economy 1917-80 by S J Lee [32] Red Empire. The Forbidden History of the USSR by G. Hughes and S. Welfare [33] www.ibguides.com/history/notes.ccom [34] Years of Russia and the USSR, 1851-1991 [35] The Rise and Fall of the Soviet Empire by D.Volkognov ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Historical Periods section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Historical Periods essays

  1. How successfully did the Labour governments of 1945-51 solve the social problems of the ...

    white paper from Churchill's government, so credit cannot entirely be given to Labour. Labour deviated from the Beveridge report's recommendation that benefits should be at the subsistence level, as this would be too expensive, instead they "were nearly a third below what Beveridge had recommended as necessary for subsistence," (Brian Abel-Smith)

  2. How and why did the Bolsheviks gain power in 1917?

    This would have been seen as without purpose, but it allowed Kornilov to march against Petrograd or Moscow. Kerensky and Kornilov discussed the problems - where Kornilov said he wanted all of the Soviet revolutionaries killed and power for himself - however, acting "in the good of Russia".

  1. To what extent did WW1 cause the collapse of Tsarism?

    Without the power of these army units, the citizens of Russia would be difficult to control and would be more likely to fight against the Tsarist state and how it was governed; not ideal if Tsarism was to survive as hoped.

  2. Lenins Economic Policies lacked consistency in the period 1918-1924. How far would you ...

    In the Bolshevik held territory, there was a slump in economic output and there were shortages of food and fuel in the cities, along with the prices of good soaring. During this time there was extreme inflation and the value of the rouble more or less complete collapsed and the

  1. To What Extent Was The South African War (1899 - 1902) A Capitalist War

    The Standard and Diggers News appeared to be a very different sort of newspaper. It was a new publication that sought to undermine the capitalist mine owners (financed by the British). It was regarded as a well-written and widely read paper that claimed that the 'capitalists (were)

  2. Which of these judgements best Reflects the State of Imperial Russia in 1914? By ...

    The most radical of the four Dumas 1906-1914 were the first two. The Kadets the major group in the first Duma pushed for land reform, progressive income tax, health insurance for workers paid for by employers and the introduction of worker elected factory inspectors.

  1. To what extent were Mussolini's economic policies successful in the years 1922-40?

    which saw greater government intervention, taking over shares in industries held by failing banks in an attempt to reorganise the failing industries. This was another major success, with the IRI eventually authorised to take over failing private industries and eventually being responsible for 90% of Italy?s ship building industry by 1939.

  2. The outbreak of the 1905 revolution was due to the grievances of the peasants ...

    Despite this they had little rights. Under Alexander II reforms occurred such as the emancipation of the serfs but this came at a price. Although they were ?free? they still had to pay large mortgage which would take 50 years to pay of thus some were still paying when Nicholas I was in power.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work