• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Despite the Camp David agreement the conflict between the Arabs and the Israelis has continued.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Despite the Camp David agreement the conflict between the Arabs and the Israelis has continued. There are deep-seated religious cultural and economic differences between the Israelis and Palestinians. All religions have places that they regard religiously significant and for both the Muslims and Jews; Jerusalem is considered to be one. They both think it is holy to them alone and that because of this they have claim to it. Both people are also wary of each other because of their different religious holidays and how they are celebrated. The fact that the Israeli people are so much wealthier than the Palestinians also causes a divide between them. Many Palestinians are unemployed refugees and have poor standards of living, whilst there are often Israelis living around them living in totally contrasting conditions due to a great deal of American aid. These conditions have helped the conflict continue because their religious differences, cultural differences and difference of opinion over Jerusalem being their own capital leads to misunderstanding and guardedness. The tension, which originates from these differences, escalates each and every day as long as these two very different people are still living in the same vicinity. The outcome of this is that these two people resent each other especially the Palestinians who feel victimized and also resent how much international aid the Israelis get. ...read more.

Middle

The Arabs warned to not sell oil to the West in order to manipulate the USA's influence over Israel. They expected this threat to force them into putting pressure on Israel to negotiate with the Arab states and they knew that if they didn't, the USA would risk losing their primary oil supply. It also expected that Israel takes the advice given to them from the USA in return for their economic and political aid because it is because of this aid that Israel has retained its strength. The Israeli's resent this expectation because in their eyes they refuse to accept that the aid from America should be conditional and so they resent the USA using it as a bribe to tell them what to do. This resentment meant that any advice received from the USA regarding a peace deal would be questioned as they believed that the USA were no longer interested in a true reflection of what the Israelis sought after. This factor could be said to be a somewhat noteworthy factor since the Arab states possess large amounts of the world's known oil reserves and so developments in the region profoundly affect other regions of the world therefore affecting how much international support the Arabs get. ...read more.

Conclusion

The West Bank is the holy land for Jews and so many Israelis criticised the Oslo accords, as they wanted to maintain the ever-increasing number of Israeli settlements in the West Bank. They saw no room for the compromises suggested in the Oslo Accords. The main reasons why the conflict has continued since 1978 are the dispute over the settlements in the West Bank and the fact that neither side is willing to compromise. This is because these are the hardest factors to resolve. Both countries regard the West Bank religiously significant (which also ties in with deep seated religious differences) and so each side insists they are entitled to ownership of the land. The fact that neither side is willing to compromise complicates this further because not only can they not live happily together because of their cultural and religious differences but it would also seem that they are unable to fairly divide the land in order to compromise because their pride won't allow it. Other factors preventing peace are the Israeli fear that the allowance of a Palestinian state is just the means to the unavoidable founding of a Palestinian state in Judea. Each and every young child is also raised sharing the deep-seated religious and cultural hatred inequalities that their parents owned. This means that this generation also shares the hatred towards their 'enemies' also Palestinians' share their desire for revenge and the Israelis' share their necessity to protect their homeland. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    On the surface, the demonstration looked like yet another episode of arm twisting between government authorities and pro-Palestinian groups. In reality, however, what happened was a Fateh-instigated confrontation with the Lebanese government. Such a confrontation would provoke a crisis which, in turn, would bring the issue of PLO armed presence into the open.

  2. To What Extent Have The Attempts For A Palestinian State Been Blocked By The ...

    Whereas the settlements and security wall are an example of a physical and somewhat militaristic manifestation of this hindrance of a peace deal towards a Palestinian state, economic restrictions upon the Palestinian economy are just as destructive to the aims for a fully autonomous state.

  1. palestinians and israelis

    The Jewish then proclaimed the land again, after an absent of 2000 years. The land was official proclaimed at 4.00pm on May 14th in Tel Aviv.

  2. While surfing the channels on TV you might hear a lot of news about ...

    We only see the gloomy surface and we don't know what lies in the background. We mustn't believe everything that we see or hear. And that's the case with different terror groups. Naturally prejudice lives in us but sometimes we should start searching under the surface.

  1. Dismantling Violence in Mozambique.

    At the same time as they constructed a peaceful present, they creatively negotiated a brighter future. They assumed new identities by refusing to further participate in the war. They kidnapped back their sons and husbands and cleansed them from the violence; thus regenerating a healing community (Nordstrom 147).

  2. Rationality, Educated Opinion and Peace

    Historically, Carr's argument seems to find sufficient basis in the outbreak of World War I. One of the reasons contributing to the war was the increase in bellicosity, arising from rationalization of cost and benefit or cooperation and non-cooperation. Prior to the Great War, the perceived cost of non-cooperation19 had decreased.

  1. Khrushchev's attempts at modernisation.

    The Soviet people felt by the early 1980's that standards of living in the Soviet Union were unsatisfactory. The situation was made worse when in 1979 Brezhnev had ordered the invasion of Afghanistan embroiling the Soviet Union in an ongoing bloody war with the afghan guerrillas (the Mujahideen ).

  2. The Arab Israeli Conflict -

    Though the attack on Israel was a surprise one, Israel was surprisingly well equipped at a military level. The country had a navy and many in her army were experienced in combat as a result of World War Two. Israel had also bought three B-17 bombers in America on the black market.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work