• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

' Did Alexander II deserve the title Tsar Liberator

Extracts from this document...


' Did Alexander II deserve the title Tsar Liberator? ' Justify your view. In the 19th Century, Russia had no zemstva, very little education, industry and railway building, a biased judicial system and very few freed peasants. Czar Alexander II, who succeeded Nicolas I in 1855, went some ways to remedying these deficiencies through a series of reforms. Alexander II became the great modernizer of Russia, walking a delicate line between preserving Russia's Slavic identity and enabling its people to benefit from Western advancements. For this reason he was known to some as the ' Czar Liberator'. However, indeed he was a liberator in name only. Alexander II initiated substantial reforms in education, the government, the judiciary and the military. In 1861, he proclaimed the emancipation of about 20 million privately held serfs. It has been described as "the greatest social movement since the French Revolution" and constituted a major step in the freeing of labour in Russia. Yet at the same time, it helped to undermine the already shaken economic foundations of Russia's landowning class. The Czar abolished a Russia tradition, the serfdom, which symbolizing class struggle and feudalism. ...read more.


But this was an attempt towards a parliamentary government. Superficially, Czar Alexander II seemed to be so liberate from his series of reform. Yet, notwithstanding these measures, it would be wrong, as is sometimes done, to describe Alexander II as a liberal. He was in fact a firm upholder of autocratic principles, sincerely convinced both of his duty to maintain the God-given autocratic power he had inherited and of Russia's unreadiness for constitutional or representative government. For the emancipation of serfs, it was actually essential more than out of the Czar's willingness. The bulk of the Russian population, about 80%, were the peasants and serfs. Alexander II recognised that emancipation was vital. Freed men would work better than serfs, freed men would not rebel against the Czar. Alexander II believed that, unless the serfs were freed, there would be a serf rebellion that threatened the Czar position, which was the nightmare of the Czar. So, the Czar would create revolution and freed the serfs - 'Better from the above than from below.' And in fact, the serfs did not really get freedom. ...read more.


The government, after 1862, had reacted increasingly with repressive police measures. A climax was reached in the spring of 1866, when a young revolutionary, attempted to kill the Emperor. This and the other demands and rebellions had persuaded the Czar that the time had come to call a halt to reform. Therefore, Czar Alexander II returned to reactionary later on. Reaction took the usual obvious steps: censorship of the press, restriction of Zemstva powers, and more government supervision of the universities, increased activity of the Third Section i.e. the secret police set up by Nicolas I, with more arrests, imprisonment and exile to Siberia. Czar Alexander II became even more conservative. To conclude, the keynote of these reforms - and there were many lesser ones affecting various aspects of Russian life - was the modernization of Russia, its release from feudalism, and acceptance of Western culture and technology. Their aim and results were the reduction of class privilege, humanitarian progress, and economic development. However, Alexander II was not a whole-hearted reformer. He used the reforms to consolidate the Czardom, instead of catering the needs of people, this could be clearly revealed by the abolition of serfdom, returned of the reactionary rule and no any further serious reform. Therefore, Alexander II could hardly called 'Czar Liberator'. Reference ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

5 star(s)

This is a very strong response that demonstrates real understanding of the strengths and limitations of Alexander II's reforms, reaching a clear judgment. On occasion, first sentences of paragraphs could be clearer but it answers the question well. 5 out of 5 stars.

Marked by teacher Natalya Luck 26/07/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    How serious a threat did the Puritans pose to Elizabeth I and her Church?

    4 star(s)

    Lockyer explains how 'this was a clear invasion of the Queen's prerogative...but they were up against men who would let nothing stand in the way of religious truth' and argues that it showed 'how the puritans were shifting their attack from matters of detail - adiaphora- to the central question

  2. Describe how Cavour, Garibaldi, Mazzini and Victor Emmanuel II helped to bring about the ...

    He was a guerrilla leader (Thousand red shirt) who provided Italy with the necessary military force. He led the 'Red Shirts' to conquered Sicily in August and invaded Naples. Soon, they took the Southern Italy. In the situation, Italy was divided into Northern Italy and Southern Italy. So Cavour persuaded Victor Emmanuel II to send troops to stop Garibaldi from taking states.

  1. Why did Labour win the 1945 election and lose in the 1951 election?

    The first-past-the-post system played a key role in both winning Labour the vote in 1945 and losing it in 1951. What seems stingingly ironic is that in 1951 the Labour party actually received the largest percentage of the vote than any other party had in Britain's history and still lost the election.

  2. "William Wilberforce was primarily responsible for the abolition of the Slave Trade in the ...

    This caused a feeling of enslavement and thus the population of these regions felt empathy for the African slaves, which consequently caused support for abolition to increase hugely. An additional factor which affected abolition was that the majority of the working class population believed that they were 'free'.

  1. How and why did Lord Liverpool survive the Radical Challenges of 1812 ...

    They were essential for Lord Liverpool. They were given more powers under the Six Acts 1819. However at Peterloo, it showed that they were not brilliant at keeping law and order. The massacre caused public opinion away despite Lord Liverpool's support.

  2. Was Charles I responsible for his execution?

    It could be said that Charles was trying to carry on the traditions of the King that had been passed onto him from his father, but he was neither politically experienced nor did he have the proper confidence to firmly establish the Divine Right.

  1. How successful were the reforms carried out by Alexander II in the second half ...

    This in my opinion strengthened the nobles and therefore the purpose of the Act did not prevail. Moreover, the disillusionment caused by the reform led to peasant revolts in Penza and Kazan, which were suppressed by the army's at the cost of 500 lives, which therefore indicates that Alexander II's expectations of preventing a revolution were minimal.

  2. Free essay

    Did the WSPU help or hinder the struggle for women's rights?

    The police cracked down hard on the riotous protests held by the WSPU and many members were arrested. This was a hindrance for the campaign as they lost public support as they were then seen as common criminals as opposed to civilized respectable middle class women.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work