• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Did Cavour or Garibaldi contribute more to the unification of Italy?

Extracts from this document...


Did Cavour or Giuseppe Garibaldi contribute more to the creation of the Kingdom of Italy in 1861? Count Cavour and Giuseppe Garibaldi both contributed heavily to the Italian unification process and are each known for there unique style of politics. Each of them contributed differently. Garibaldi was more military minded and brought together forces like the red shirts to oppose the Austrian influence with force. Cavour becoming the Prime Minister of Piedmont-Sardinia in 1852 had more of a political stance on unification, Cavour was very 'tunnel minded' he was only focused on the welfare of Piedmont; he believed piedmont should be the centre of a united Italian infrastructure. Cavour spent his career improving infrastructure, stabilising economy and strengthening Sicily. ...read more.


After Cavour "justified" war with Austria by sheltering Austrian deserters and encouraging Austria's Italian provinces to revolt and sent their ultimatum in 1859 to Sardinia, France received what seemed a pre arranged reward for aiding piedmont they claimed Nice and Savoy as spoils of war. Garibaldi brought a lot of different qualities to Italian unification, first of all he was a pronounced republican second he was very liberal and believed in the freedom of the individual and also a immersed Italian Patriot, these factors led him to aid in unification very differently to Cavour. Cavour was very radical and did not want foreign support; this caused him to create his own "Thousand Red Shirt Army" which had a noted success when they landed in Sicily to quell a rebellion against King Francis II in 1860. ...read more.


Also Cavour did not set out to aid Italy his main aim was to expand Piedmont into a constitutional Monarchy which is why he allowed states to be taken by and given to other countries as long as it benefited him. In conclusion I believe each contributed a great deal to the Italian unification movement but as Garibaldi's actions can only be seen to aid Italy unlike Cavour who allowed Napoleon to take Nice and Savoy so Piedmont could improve. Garibaldi's actions may have been seen as embarrassing with failures but even these failures aided Italy in some way by showing there was a resistance and they were not going to give in until Italy was free from foreign influence, and this I believe is why Garibaldi contributed a fraction more than Cavour. Lewis Montague ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Contrast The Contribution Made By Mazzini, Cavour and Garibaldi to Italian Unification

    4 star(s)

    he sent Piedmontese troops with an excuse of disturbances in Umbra to meet with Garibaldi at Teano. What is more, one of the good features of Cavour was his opportunism: when he recognized the nationalistic movements and demands within Italy, not only was he aware that they could endanger Piedmont?s

  2. What had Garibaldi contributed to Italian Unification by 1861

    This attitude to the idea of Italy shows Garibaldi as the most important Italian nationalist during the unifying period and through his invasions of the peninsula he brings Italian nationalism to the forefront of European affairs.

  1. Compare & Contrast Cavour & Garibaldi's Contributions to the Unification.

    Essentially, Cavour was a conservative and an opponent of Mazzinian views. He was also a liberal in many respects and a socialist opposer.

  2. Who was more responsible for the success of Italian Unification up to 1861? Cavour, ...

    (Years of Nationalism Cowie and Wolfson) Thus Napoleon had triggered the unification process. However he did not set up the circumstances, from which the snowball would roll off Garibaldi. summed up the feeling at the time "Do not forget the gratitude we owe Napoleon III and the French army, so

  1. Compare and contrast Cavour and Garibaldi's contributions to Unification.

    Both Cavour and Garibaldi put a great deal of effort into the unification process - Cavour in mostly diplomatic means and Garibaldi in mostly military. When comparing the roles of Cavour and Garibaldi in Italian unification, it is necessary to take a look at the two parties' eagerness for the cause.

  2. Why did the war against Austria in 1859 result in the unification of most ...

    Having being born in Nice, Garibaldi was angered and plotted to get it back into Italian hands. He began working on an armed expedition to recover Nice from France, he planned to blow up the ballot boxes which would determine the outcome of the votes for Nice to remain Italian or become French.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work