• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Did Germany cause World War One?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Did Germany cause World War One? The polarities of the question on War origins can be summed up in two phrases: Germany planned and caused the War and The nations of Europe stumbled into War. Between these two extremes is a broad central position which, historians have been debating for years. While no one nation can entirely hold responsibility for the War, some nations hold more responsibility than others. For centuries, historians have had swinging opinions on the matter. In the 1920s and 30s, German historians managed to turn the page and succeeded in proving the 'War guilt', announced in 1919, at the treaty of Versailles, as being unfair. Naturally, later in the 1940s British historians found ways to prove the German historians of the 20s and 30s wrong. More recently, in the 1960s a German historian, Fritz Fischer, renewed accusations for German responsibilities for War, basing them on German expansionist aims from early in the century. At no point is Germany the sole carrier of responsibility for the War, but from all perspectives, Germany is by far the most contributing. ...read more.

Middle

Fischer says that the decision was taken in late 1912 that Germany should launch a war at the first favorable opportunity. 'Its main objectives would be to achieve expansionist goals in Europe and overseas. Germany would expand her power base in Europe by annexing territory in the east and possibly in the west as well.' A German perspective was that a successful War would enable Germany to become a colonial power in Africa by acquiring French and Belgian colonies - the "Mittelafrica" policy. By this, Fischer emphasizes the German desire for War and "Weltpolitik". German efforts during the July 1914 crisis were consistent with this aim. Firstly, Germany put pressure on it brother Austria-Hungry to act against Serbia even if it meant an outbreak of a general War. Hence the 'blank cheque' of July 5th, when Austria-Hungry was sworn alliance and full support by Germany. Secondly, the German Chancellor was not seeking a peaceful solution but was adapting to create the most favorable situation for a German victory. ...read more.

Conclusion

This pride was a constantly emphasized by the Kaiser. He was preparing his country for war and showed it naturally through his pride in his accomplishments. The idea of colonizing is very much related to this idea. Historian, Dr. J. Winter, states that a German mentality was that 'They deserved'. What they deserved; saying there country was good and therefor more land was what they deserved, more power, "Weltpolitik". Germany was mentally ready for war, and according to the Kaiser Wilhelm II, war was the only possible next step. Under no conditions would it be historically correct to take either one of the polarities of the question whether Germany caused World War One or not. There is no doubt that Germany carries a major weight on its back, on which guilt is printed, but there were other causes, not German related, that contributed. The cause of outbreak of war is directly related to the incident on the 5th of July 1914, whose causes were ruling decisions made, who by themselves were influenced by rise in international tension from about 1905, which was generated grossly by Germany. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Why did tension increase in Europe between 1900 and 1914?

    Did bombardment work? * At the Somme it failed. The German positions were built on chalk downland, which allowed deep dugouts to be constructed. * At Passchendaele in 1917, the bombardment destroyed what was left of the drainage system around Ypres and the attacking troops were forced to cross 'No Man's Land' on duck-boards, so boggy was the ground.

  2. How far was Germany responsible for the outbreak of war in 1914?

    The dreadnought race would certainly have angered Britain as they were an 'enclosed' island, they relied heavily on their navy for defence and now they were being challenged. Schmitt manages to explain how one cause of the war influenced another: "The faster the German fleet grew, the more alarmed the

  1. How Significant were the Normandy landings in Defeating Germany in World War Two?

    Therefore, I can see why credit goes to the Western Allies as they were the 'saviours' but it was Russia who was fighting of German in the East in the first place. The Soviets feel 'forgotten' it seems, from the way the source appears, that Russians just want some sort of recognition for their efforts in the outcome.

  2. Total War, Britain during the Second World War

    However, there was even greater resistance to being moved this time. 68% of women and children refused to be evacuated and at least 53% of London children were still in the city in late 1940. Evacuation led to a complete mixing of social classes.

  1. Africa and the role they played during both of the world wars.

    from the Portugese colony to the south.29 Von Lettow, was outnumbered, but brilliantly kept slipping away from flanking forces, time and time again in the rough African terrain. Basically, the Germans attacked and inflicted many casualties, while being able to slip away.

  2. The 'cause' of the First World War.

    France and Britain formed the Entente Cordialle in 1904 after the Boer War - Germany supported the Boers possibly planning to exploit Britain's weakness. In 1907 Russia joined the French and British, there were now two opposing camps within the main body of Europe sparked by rivalries in different theatres.

  1. China After World War II

    The strike struggles are economic in character. They gravitate around such questions as wages, conditions of labor, and unemployment. Thus the struggle is in its first, elementary stage. Once production is restored and the currency stabilized, one may expect an elevation of the struggle to the political plane.

  2. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    The Lebanese Front decided to adopt a "wait and see" attitude to the Syrian advance into Lebanon as they felt that they had no other choice. Taking on the Syrians in a military confrontation would have been a disaster

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work