• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Did Lenin change Russia for better or for worse since the November revolution?

Extracts from this document...


Did Lenin change Russia for better or for worse since the November revolution? I think that overall, he changed Russia for the better, but, how he got there was a very difficult route. Lenin must have been making decision on a very long term scale, because some made at the time wouldn't have seemed very positive. Yet these decisions helped shape the prospering Russia. In 1924, Economy was booming and the masses were happy. Lenin's NEP enabled the peasants who worked harder, to earn a better life. Sounds similar to capitalism methinks. But his propaganda could cover this fact up as he claimed it to only be a temporary solution to Russia's problems. Seeing as the public was happy, the communist party had better control of the state, which was now the USSR. Some may argue that it was worse than it was before under the provisional government as a result of Lenin's extreme methods used in times of trouble, e.g. ...read more.


5. Both sources B and C give the fact that was a lot of pillaging of small towns during the civil war. There were beatings of peasants and other villagers. But both sides claim another did it. This tells me that the peasants and workers of innocent towns were not treated well by either side. The Armies considered themselves to be the most powerful forces, and could take what they needed, because they were "doing it for the greater good," 6. This statement is very exact. Therefore I would disagree, even though the fact that the whites were lacking in organisation and were fighting on seven different fronts did come into play. I would say that The Reds did have many positive points, which eventually led them to victory. Many of these are stated in source D. We know for a fact that Lenin and Trotsky were very intelligent military leaders, especially Trotsky, and would be able to successfully manoeuvre. ...read more.


Between 1934 and 1938 he inaugurated a massive purge of the party, government, armed forces, and intelligentsia in which millions of so-called "enemies of the people' were imprisoned, exiled, or shot. In 1938 he signed the Non-Aggression Pact with Hitler which bought the Soviet Union two years respite from involvement in World War II. After the German invasion (1941), the USSR became a member of the Grand Alliance, and Stalin, as war leader, assumed the title of generalissimo. He took part in the conferences of Tehran, Yalta, and Potsdam which resulted in Soviet military and political control over the liberated countries of postwar E and C Europe. From 1945 until his death he resumed his repressive measures at home, and conducted foreign policies which contributed to the Cold War between the Soviet Union and the West. He was posthumously denounced by Khrushchev at the 20th Party Congress (1956) for crimes against the Party and for building a "cult of personality'. Under Gorbachev many of Stalin's victims were rehabilitated, and the whole phenomenon of "Stalinism' officially condemned by the Soviet authorities. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Russia 1905-1941 'Explain how the unpopularity of the Provisional Government contributed to the Bolshevik ...

    These slogans evoked a response from the Russian public as they coincided with the views of the masses. Lenin promised to end all their hardships and sufferings and this gained additional support for the Bolsheviks. The Bolsheviks did not create the people's plan, they merely articulated it and Lenin utilised it to gain power.

  2. Stalins Russia, 1924-53 revision guide

    * Others believe that Stalin adapted Lenin's policies and was less concerned with ideology and more with the struggle for and retention of power. * Stalinism was, therefore, not a coherent philosophy, but rather a means of putting policies into practice.

  1. "Mussolini was an all powerful dictator" - How accurate is this statement?

    Then he used Farranacis's bad remarks as an excuse to put him under house arrest, got powerful radical fascist out of power Mussolini didn't give state positions to party members and kept them out of civil service so kept them out of power Controlled MVSN ( 50,000 armed militia)

  2. Lenin and the Bolshevik revolution.

    Essentially, they wanted enough to eat. In a country with a collapsing economy, a decaying system of transportation, and millions of hungry soldiers in the field, providing adequate food was in itself a considerable challenge. Beyond this, one of the most basic concerns for Russian industrial workers was keeping pace

  1. Were the Bolsheviks a positive or negative force for change in Russia?

    In July 1918 the Bolsheviks called the Congress of the Soviets to decide on a number of things. 1) Abolition of all political parties except the Communist party. 2) Move the capital from Petrograd to Moscow. 3) Change the name of the country from Russia to the Russian Soviet Federal Socialist Republic (Lowe).

  2. Russian Revolution Sources Questions

    This is true, at the date when this conversation took place in 1928, Stalin had already dismissed the Left Opposition who were Trotsky and two of his supporters, Zinoviev and Kamenev in 1927. By this time Stalin was in the process of eliminating the Right Opposition, of whom Bukharin was part of.

  1. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    The failures in the plan were mainly due to the higher priority increasingly given to defence. The Stakhanovite movement: On 30 August 1935, Alexi Stkhanov did a five-hour shift, cutting 102 tonnes of coal with his pick. This was 16 times the average a shift.

  2. How far did government policies change towards agriculture in Russia in the period 1856-1964? ...

    However, it is uncertain whether his actions were born out of hatred, or to consolidate his grip on power. Thus there is great contrast between the Tsarist and Communist approach to controlling the peasantry through agricultural policy.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work