• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Did Mussolini's foreign policy follow and consistent principles?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Did Mussolini's foreign policy follow and consistent principles? January 4th Chris Gray L.6.C Mussolini's foreign policy had two main features. Both of these features illustrate what Mussolini wanted to achieve as a Fascist dictator. The first feature is empire; this consisted of Mussolini's desire to win over the Mediterranean, African colonies and Albania and the Balkans. The second main feature was Italian greatness; Mussolini would achieve this by war and force and by diplomatic means. These Two main principles used show some consistency, in that Mussolini's primary method of achieving them was to use force and use his status as a dictator to the full. However, it can be argued that although foreign policy in general followed consistent principles, the Two main principles were never directly carried out individually, this highlights the way in which Mussolini used force to push smaller countries around, and at the same time used democratic means to try and ally with greater countries e.g. Britain and France. Britain and France controlled the Mediterranean with their fleets. Mussolini undoubtedly recognised that he could not take the Mediterranean by force, particularly with the British Navy fleet on hand; therefore he sought an alliance with Germany. ...read more.

Middle

Mussolini's first real use of aggressive foreign policy was to be seen in Abyssinia (Ethiopia). It can be argued, after seeing the ill prepared Ethiopian resistance, that this was merely a ploy to demonstrate the power of Italy to Hitler before Germany became too strong. However the apparent reasons for invasion were to gain more troops and bring an African colony into the Italian sphere of influence. This event goes along with the principle of empire; by taking Ethiopia Mussolini was not only increasing Italian prestige but also consolidating Italian position in East Africa, overall this shows a thoroughly aggressive approach from Mussolini to avenge the Adowa defeat and generally put Italy on the map as a warrior nation. Mussolini used manipulative tactics during this period; in 1928 the treaty of friendship was signed, however this did not stop the brutal tactics of the dictator in disposing of a poor Ethiopian resistance. Arguably the most democratic and pacifistic act by Mussolini in his foreign policy was the declaration of non-belligerence. This was a rather sly move by Mussolini, in that he waited until his allies were nearing defeat and then sided with Germany to get a share of the spoils. ...read more.

Conclusion

'the pact of steel', ultimately though this was not good enough, Italy was not taken seriously as a power. Concluding, Mussolini's foreign policy did follow two main principles, however these were not consistent. Mussolini's foreign policy goals were too ambitious, an error that resulted in an inconsistent foreign policy because he constantly promised things that he could not deliver, resulting in violence to try and solve the problem. At times Italy was seen as a welcome ally to Western democracies, however aggressive actions showed that Italy could not be true to their word and keep the peace. Neither method involved in foreign policy had any success, emphasising the ambitious nature of the aims, but with regards to consistency Mussolini seemed incapable of delivering any. In the 1920's Mussolini used the League of Nations and diplomacy to negotiate concessions, he makes himself useful to Great Britain and France to get help. However actions in the Balkans and Corfu in 1923 show that Mussolini was simply trying to use the two powers, as he did not think they would stop him using aggressive tactics. Foreign policy was unsuccessful, this is due to the inconsistency of the principles behind it. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Was Hitler a weak dictator?

    However some others see Hitler's foreign policy as a complete change, first of all there was the factor of an ideology uniting Germany and this ideology incites the expansion of German territory. Secondly as Hitler stated, the past foreign policies only protected German interests and secured boundaries, his foreign policy

  2. To What Extent Did Mussolini Achieve his Foreign Policy Aims of making Italy "Great ...

    An immediate apology was demanded from Ethiopia and the matter was referred to the League of Nations. Over the next 10 months, Italy prepared for a full-scale invasion of Ethiopia. At first, all seemed well for Mussolini, especially as Britain and France were unwilling to condemn his attitude.

  1. "How far do the sources suggest consistent aims in Mussolini's foreign policy 1922-1939?"

    From the sources we can determine six main foreign policy aims. These were to gain dominance over the Mediterranean, which Italy was fighting over with Britain and France, to achieve supremacy in the Balkans, with these policies he could establish an Empire, and this would result in the spread of

  2. What were the main principles of British Foreign Policy from 1793-1853 and how far ...

    Therefore it is evident that a clear aspect of British Foreign Policy was self protection. Another consistent aspect of British Foreign Policy was trade. Britain knew that the only way for trade to flourish was maintaining European peace and expanding the Empire.

  1. 'PRACTICAL CONSIDERATIONS OUTWEIGHED IDEOLOGY IN FOREIGN POLICY' IN RELATION TO GERMANY IN THE YEARS ...

    According to Hitler, the ideal war was one of conquest, extermination, and suppression; the ideal area in which to conduct such a war was in the east, where the German people would win for itself the Lebensraum, necessary for its moral and racial purity, as well as for its ultimate

  2. Can historical parallels be drawn between democracies and dictatorships?

    Again like other leader discussed previously, Stalin started purges to get rid of opposition and anyone who threatened his position. The purges started with the Kirov Murder in 1934, a man who was very popular and posed a threat to Stalin's position.

  1. Causes of show trials + purges of 1930s.

    There were the very rich but they were such a small number that they didn't pose any threat. But there were many Kulaks. He could only think of three ways of dealing with them. These were: firing squads, moving them to Siberia, or downgrade them to peasant level.

  2. Mussolinis’s Foreign Policy

    He was mistrusted by both, London and Paris and was set aside from the European stage. The incident in Corfu, in 1923 gave Mussolini the reputation of being a dangerous firebrand. In 1923 Mussolini seized the chance to occupy Corfu, a strategically important island guarding the Southern entrance into the

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work