• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Did Napoleon betray the French Revolution?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Did Napoleon betray the French Revolution? "They wanted a George Washington..." - Napoleon on his deathbed From the given quote, it is clear that if one had asked Napoleon himself if he had betrayed the revolution, he would have answered in affirmative. And he would have been right too, to a great extent. Ending the democratic governing body of Directoire in November 1799 with the Brumaire coup, he had indeed made himself the antithesis of the French Revolution. For an ex-Jacobin and a friend of Alexander Robespierre, his actions, by his own admission as well as the majority of historians chronicling him later, would be described as a betrayal to the Revolution. After declaring himself an Emperor (thereby openly straying away from the ideal of equality and democracy) in 1801, he drove his indifference to the revolutionary ideals further home by inviting the Pope to his coronation. This coronation took place in a France that had recently abolished the privileges of the clergy and whose last King had been imprisoned because of his refusal to declare the members of the Church government regulated employees. ...read more.

Middle

The expansionist policies of Napoleon too, were not exactly conciliatory to Revolutionary ideals. While wars had also been fought till 1799 against Prussia, Austria and Britain by the revolutionary governments themselves, the reasons were completely different from those that had inspired Napoleon. While the revolutionaries had passionately declared that they would free any land they conquered from its feudal workings and establish upon it a government based on the ideals of Liberty, Equality and Fraternity and their wars had subsequently been explained by many historians including Thomson as a conflict between the ideologies of the European Empires versus the Enlightenment, the Napoleonic wars were fought with the objectives not of reform but of controlling and profiting from the entire economic system of Europe. Ambition to hold every empire in a peace treaty favorable to France's development had spurred Napoleon onto wars with Britain, Germany and Russia. Thus, from these facts it is highly believable that Napoleon was a despot and hence a betrayer of the Revolution. ...read more.

Conclusion

The revolution had started with economic and social instability. Napoleon was successful in restoring the socio-economic stability of France. His reign had been, internally, at least, the most peaceful in the decade. So, as far as the necessities that had led "the mildest men to be agitated" (Wordsworth) and the reign of terror to be unleashed were concerned, they had finally been resolved by a firm leader. In so far, Napoleon, instead of betraying the revolution, was actually fulfilling the words of the British politician Edmund Burke who had stated years before that the "uncontrolled passion" and violence of the Revolution would end in the dictatorship of a soldier someday. To conclude, while it is tempting to believe that Napoleon led France from its Revolutionary ideals into an absolutist government and a colonial mentality, we must remember that Napoleon was more of the inevitable conclusion of the bloodbath and internal strife of the past decade than the precursor of a twentieth century dictatorship. And though his was a despotic rule, it was a benevolent despotism and like the Revolutionaries themselves, his first and greatest priority was always France. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Major Causes of French Revolution

    4 star(s)

    rise in food prices to increase their daily expenditures on bread to level far beyond their means. Thus, peasants and urban tradesmen and workers- not to mention manufacturers- were drawn together in a connection of hostility towards the government, landlords, merchants and speculators.

  2. To what extent was Napoleon an enlightened despot?

    This conclusive evidence about the nature and substance of his reign can support no other view than that Napoleon was a dictator with ultimate control. The distinction, however, between an enlightened despot and a 'run of the mill' dictator can only be by looking at whether he upheld the Revolutionary principles.

  1. To what extent is it fair to see Napoleon as the betrayer to the ...

    It was the beginnings of a new nobility. Newspapers were suppressed, disruptive theatres closed, and critical authors sent into exile. He did put plebiscites to the French, yet Napoleon had the whole support of the army so this could be seen as a reign of terror. His use of such ruthless police chiefs as Joseph Fouche to suppress

  2. How successful was Napoleon III?

    because he had been over confident and so showed him up as an amateur who could not carry out his threats. Napoleon's biggest failure was with his foreign policy and the way he handled Prussia, this ultimately led to the collapse of him and his regime.

  1. Did napoleon betray the Revolution?

    However, Napoleon is more easily seen as a betrayer of the revolution, Napoleon's style of government was more authoritarian. Which went against the ideas of the revolution. Napoleon claimed to use elected bodies, but in reality the system of elections was so indirect that universal suffrage was made meaningless.

  2. 'In the context of the period 1715-1815 to what extent were economic factors the ...

    In reality, France had gained little in a conflict that had crippled the crown's treasury. In order to cope with the mounting Crown debt (the interest alone had reached 318 million livres in 17883), Louis XVI needed to drastically cut government spending and reform the tax structure.

  1. To What Extent was Napoleon Master of Europe

    It was hoped to threaten the English power and trade in Egypt. It was going to be an easy victory against the weak Egyptians. It was therefore called the Battle of the Pyramids and, then there was a sudden craze for Egyptian fashions.

  2. To what extent was Napoleon nothing more than a dictator?

    He said himself that ?the mystery of social order? lay in religion, and can be seen to have secured the property rights of the middle-classes whilst promoting religious freedom as a means of stabilising his position as First Consul, rather than for an enlightened need to improve the lives of the French people.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work