• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Did public opinion support Eden's decision to take military action against Egypt?

Extracts from this document...


Did public opinion support Eden's decision to take military action against Egypt? Occurring just eleven years after the Second World War, the Suez crisis divided Britain into the Right, eager to suppress and destroy Nasser's dictatorial regime and a more liberal and tolerant Left. The British general public ideally wanted to avoid war, however some thought that an assault on Egypt would recapture the Suez canal, restore Britain's national pride and halt the fast growing Arab nationalism which was catalysed by Nasser and his party's ideals. Conversely, others thought that this coercive, imperialistic policy would increase tensions in the Middle East, encourage Arab nationalism and infuriate the already hostile Soviets. There is no doubt that some elements of the British press did not support the authoritarian or at best oligarchic regime that Nasser installed in Egypt. ...read more.


This means that this article could be interpreted as suggesting that the British public would have supported military action against Egypt. This may not have been the case however, as someone who opposed Nasser's dictatorship may not have necessarily supported military action. For instance a pacifist may be horrified at the chauvinistic policies exerted by the Egyptian government on its people but they would still not advocate military action especially if they considered Eden's motives for war to be economic not humanitarian. There were in fact huge demonstrations in Trafalgar Square set up by the labour opposition. So whilst this source does suggest that British public opinion at the time was anti Nasser it does not give a comprehensive insight into whether public opinion backed or opposed Eden as some people may still have condemned the attack despite their views on Nasser. ...read more.


This particular protest was staged in London but it is highly likely that others took place in other towns across the country. Therefore this source is coherent with source F but incoherent with source D demonstrating further that public opinion was divided in Britain. Overall, it seems as though the British general public was generally against Nasser and his regime, they wanted Britain to regain control of the Suez Canal but felt that the situation in the Middle East could easily escalate and cause friction between the USSR (Egypt's ally) and western Europe. Finally, there were some people who viewed the war as completely 'immoral' and condemned it for deontological ideological? reasons. These factors meant that public opinion was divided throughout Britain as there were differing views as to how to solve the Suez crisis. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Rationality, Educated Opinion and Peace

    As Zimmern states, "the statesmen and the peoples have not adjusted their minds to the new realities"31. The central concern with the issue of change harkens to a broader issue on which the three writers concur: the possibility of progress.

  2. Qu 3 Did public opinion in Britain support ...

    However, I believe that if people went in search of a good intelligent opinion over whether or not military action is needed, they would refer to a broadsheet paper such as the Independent or Telegraph. This source is limited because of our lack of knowledge of the paper's readership and, more importantly, who agrees with the statement.

  1. Europe and the Suez Crisis 1956 - To what extent was the military action ...

    According to Peter L. Hahn, Eisenhower viewed Nasser as a danger of Western threat but believed that force only would facilitate Soviet infiltration in the region.6 So the Americans proposed an association of canal users, the SCUA, when it was revealed that the British and French tried to seek approval

  2. What can you learn form Source A about Anthony Eden's reasons for opposing Colonel ...

    What I have said so far is the usefulness of this source but some things make this source unreliable. First of all the crowd is not very big and so this may only be the few supporters he has. Also the picture is not very clear and due to this

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work