• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Did Richard III lose the Throne, or did Henry Tudor gain it?

Extracts from this document...


Did Richard III lose the Throne, or did Henry Tudor gain it? There are many views as to whether Richard III lost his throne, or if it was a mainly Tudor advance which secured it. Overall I think that Henry Tudor did not actively gain the throne decisively, in fact Richard III lost it from making key mistakes throughout his reign, and at Bosworth. Richard weakened his grasp on the throne by indulging in a vast plantations policy which gave too much power to Northerners and inevitably made him dependant on these few. The fact that Northerners were given such a huge dependence enraged the South, and rid Richard of many possible backers during a war. Richard had also been so determined to suppress any rebellions and secure Henry Tudors downfall that he spent vast National funds on these ventures. He eventually was weakening the nations funding in huge amounts. Richard had made large mistakes in his previous years, including when he offered the Duke of Brittany a whole legion of British Archers in return for Henry as a prisoner. ...read more.


Richard made several different reasons for why he was the rightful king, rather than concentrating on his strongest point. This meant that his numerous reasons were tarnished by the sheer number, and sometimes, circumstantial evidence. Henry Tudor did not have much to do to secure the throne other than succeed at Bosworth. This did not prove such a task as previously thought due to the fact that he had much assistance and Richard proved a lesser opponent. Henry Tudor arrived in Wales with 2, 000 of his supporters. He also brought with him over 2, 000 mercenaries recruited from French prisons. While in Wales, Henry also persuaded many skilful longbow men to join him in his fight against Richard. By the time Henry Tudor reached England the size of his army had grown to 5,000 men. When Richard heard about the arrival of Henry he marched his army to meet his rival for the throne. On the way, Richard tried to recruit as many men as possible to fight in his army, but by the time he reached Leicester he only had an army of 6,000 men. ...read more.


Richard had a larger army with vast support from Northumberland (shown at the back of the forces) and from Norfolk (as the vanguard). Richard instead of striking a good defensive position, attacked down the hill, sacrificing his position. Richard did not think and consider his options before he made the offensive, he acted rashly and launched the offensive in a heat of rage. Northumberland is seen at the back of the battle, which was poor planning seeing as Richard should have doubted his loyalty. If he wanted to make sure Northumberland was involved in the battle and actually fought for him, he should have placed him at the front of the forces, to ensure he was in the conflict. Northumberland had been plotting against Richard since he had over looked him for the post of Leader of the North. Instead John De La Pole was appointed and this made Northumberland very jealous. Northumberland recognised his fortunate chance to deceive Richard and did not join in the fighting, leaving Richard open at the back, and with much less men than previously assumed. This was the deciding event that lost Richard his throne. Ewan Stevenson L6 Creighton History ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. How was Isabella able to secure her succession to the Castilian throne in 1469-1479?

    Grandees, like Ferdinand, could raise vast armies and like Ferdinand, they could halt rebellions and uprisings in towns. Those who supported Isabella could also help withstand the Portuguese menace and Joanna's claim. Unlike Ferdinand, these grandees were already Castilian and thus had vested interests in the outcomes of political, social and military situations.

  2. "What does the author gain and/or lose through the use of the first person ...

    whole thing: "And it made me feel better in some obscure way: imagining myself a hero, rushing for the gun, instead of merely loitering in its path like the bystander I so essentially am." (Epilogue) In a similar vein, as the group begins to fall apart, and the realisation of

  1. Warner Bros.' GoodFellas (1990) is director Martin Scorsese's stylistic masterpiece - a follow-up film ...

    The camera pans across Henry's and Karen's bedroom closets to shamelessly show "the little extras" of the good life - rows of suits, shoes, dresses, and coats. She describes for Henry how much money she needs for shopping by holding her fingers a few inches apart, and rewards him with

  2. Discuss Shakespeare's presentation of women in Richard III. Are they convincing characters?

    In Act 2 Scene 4, we see Elizabeth's reaction to learning the news of her kinsmen's imprisonment- 'Aye me! I see the ruin of my house.' She knows that the imprisonment is likely to lead to death. Elizabeth is now frightened for own safety, including her sons, one of which is the heir to the throne.

  1. How important was foreign support for Henry Tudor in explaining Richard III

    This attributed to Henry's eventual win because Richard underestimated the threat that Henry posed to the throne if he would have taken him more seriously then he would have been able to stop him before he launched his second invasion.

  2. The Battle of Bosworth.

    The Size of the Armies It is not certain as to how man men Richard or Henry would have had. The sources claim that Richard would have had huge numbers of men. However it would have been impossible for Richard to place a very large amount of men on the hill.

  1. Why was Henry Tudor able to overthrow Richard III?

    Stanley, it led to uproar, meaning even more people despised him before he took the crown. This mistrust that stemmed from his usurpation meant he already had great enemies, many were upset and angered by their new king and therefore sought an alternative, which became Henry Tudor.

  2. Did Richard III lose or Henry win the throne in 1485?

    Richards usurpation of the throne was not the only reason why people did not like or trust him however. Richard, Duke of Gloucester arrested Hastings on a false charge of treason on the 13th June 1483 and had him beheaded without trial (beheading for treason was common for nobility).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work