• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Did Stalin betray the Russian Revolution?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Did Stalin betray the Russian Revolution? By the time of Josef Stalin's death in 1953, the face and structure of Russia had changed forever. Two leaders had interpreted Marxism in different and apparently opposite ways and the country still bore the scars. There is an almost romantic stereotype which dominates traditional history of the Soviet Union, which is perhaps best exemplified in George Orwell's 'Animal Farm'; that the revolution was wholly good-natured, led by the disciple of Marx, Lenin. Stalin is seen as the egotistical tyrant who betrayed his father figures. Trotsky is Orwell's 'Snowball', a blameless defender of the revolution who would have been far more preferable as a leader to the man who sent him into exile. These are merely ideals, and fall apart under scrutiny. Vladimir Lenin was responsible for establishing and legitimating almost every facet of Stalin's dictatorship. This is a viable defence for Stalin; that he was only following in his predecessor's footsteps. Indeed, the implications of this are so massive that the historian Volkogonov - albeit a known anti-Leninist - wrote that "all of the evil in the soviet system in its 74-year existence stemmed from Lenin". ...read more.

Middle

It is ironic that Stalin took Hitler at his word while apparently distrusting the vast majority of the population of his own country and the entire outside world. The 'Great Patriotic War', itself a contradiction in terms as a Marxist leader has to discourage nationalism rather than encourage it if he is to call himself Marxist at all, saw more hypocritical actions on Stalin's part, not least the toleration of religion exclusively as a morale boost; this could only have been seen as heresy for the committed atheists Marx and Lenin. This was little more than 'opium for the masses' in a time when they needed to forget the dual horror inflicted on them by the invaders and their own government. The most damning criticism of Stalin is not just that he was "corroding the soul of bolshevism", as Trotsky saw it, but that he was not furthering the revolution at all and in failing to do so his government was a counter-revolution. As Orwell pointed out in his book 'Animal Farm', certainly by the time of Stalin's death few people could trust their memories of what life was like before the revolution as they had been told so many half-truths and lies. ...read more.

Conclusion

The attempt to turn a pre-industrial country into a Communist power while bypassing the necessary middle stage of capitalism eventually turned out to be such a failure that he "consigned Marxism to the historical scrapheap"5. Lenin betrayed Marxism by bringing about a revolution in the wrong country at the wrong point in its development, and also betrayed the revolution itself with his tools of manipulation and terror. Stalin betrayed any common decency Lenin may have kept and used the system inherited from him to terrorise his people for his own security. If Marx and Engels would have tolerated such extreme deviation in order to sustain the workers' revolution in the long term, then Stalin was acting in the best interests of the USSR. However, taking into account the fact that Marx and Engels foresaw Communism as a 'utopia', it was not in reality even a 'dictatorship of the proletariat' in any shape or form, since the people had no say in how their lives were run under Lenin or Stalin. Even by the time of Brezhnev's death 27 years after Stalin's, the basis of a society which punished 'senseless dreams' with persecution, death or a spell in a prison camp was still in place. The theoretical difference between Tsarist and Communist Russia was huge; the practical difference in the end was minimal. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    To what extent does Stalin deserve the title of Red Tsar when assessing his ...

    5 star(s)

    Although some of these methods continued under Khrushchev, they were comparatively less horrific. Even though grain seizures were common to all communist leaders, it is important to recognise that all communist leaders were against the forced collectivisation experienced under Stalin, which led to widespread famine in Russia.

  2. Did napoleon betray the Revolution?

    The judicature too was put back into the hands of the ruler, judges were to be appointed by the ruler, and then would follow his ideas. This took the power away from the people in being able to elect the judges they thought would be fair and just.

  1. Evaluate historical comparisons of Hitler and Stalin and their regimes

    Bullock argues that they relied on both being extreme in order gain power throughout Europe. Bullock masterfully intertwines both of their lives throughout the book by focussing on every aspect, ranging from their childhood, early political careers, rise to power, war and terror, economy, popular support, art and culture and more importantly their regimes.

  2. Compare the characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin Both Vladimir Lenin and Joseph ...

    'Cretins', 'Bloodsuckers' and 'scum' were among the more repeatable labels he applied to his political opponents" Lenin's Russia - Alan White (Coursework Booklet) Lenin was a man who always followed a schedule. He always had a certain routine of doing things and was very punctual: "Lenin's day was regularly ordered.

  1. 'Without Lenin there would have been no revolution' - David Footman, an academic British ...

    It has been reported that before the October revolution, Lenin went to his retreat in Finland and started writing plans to change and transform Russia. However, it can be said to a certain extent the source is not entirely true.

  2. Historians such as Pipes and Volkogonov have made the interpretation that Lenin was a ...

    Historians believe that Lenin can be seen as dictatorial as he chose to deal with the opposition by terrorist means, and that he "felt no qualms in resorting to "merciless" terror."9 Pipes believes that Lenin is a dictator as he planned to use terror before there had been any organised opposition against him.

  1. Lenin and the Bolshevik revolution.

    As John Keep observes, however weak they may have been by objective standards, "they were strong enough to overcome opponents who had lost the will to resist." After the revolution they would become the germ of the new Red Army.

  2. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    Stalin could only get him imprisoned at first, but he was eventually executed in 1937. 3. British engineers (1933): Six were tried for industrial spying. The Kirov assassination: 1. Sergei Kirov is portrayed as one of the most popular Communist leaders.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work