• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Did Stalin come to power in Russia through adapting himself to the system or by adapting the system to him?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Did Stalin come to power in Russia through adapting himself to the system or by adapting the system to him? When Lenin passed on in 1924, he left behind his legacy to a select few members of the Politburo, namely Stalin, Trotsky, Rykov, Tomsky, Kamenev and Zinoviev. All of whom were earmarked for the possibility of taking over the helm of the Bolshevik party- some more than others. It was in this time that Stalin managed to manoeuvre himself into this key role, strategically sidelining the other candidates along the way. The question remains on whether he was able to come to power through careful treading within the constraints of the bureaucracy or whether he was a master manipulator, puppeteering the system while exploiting any loopholes he could find along the way to ease his ascension. In this essay, we will aim to evaluate Stalin's actions in order to establish which of the pair of causes mentioned above was the key attribute to his success. We will also consider the circumstances through which Stalin was able to use the abovementioned methods to achieve his aims. During Lenin's time as head of the Bolsheviks, Stalin had made immense contributions to the party and his reputation was formed upon his role in the Russian Revolution of 1917 as well as the 1921 Red Army invasion of Georgia. ...read more.

Middle

On the other hand, Stalin was able to exploit the vulnerabilities of his opponents and mask his shortcomings. Such was his masterstroke as he manipulated his foes to nothingness. Stalin had perfected the tools of the system and the recruitment process. Through his power of patronage as the General Secretary, he had strategically placed his associates in key positions within the party who he could rely on to elevate him to the highest office of the party when the time came.4 Stalin then moved on to eliminate his opposition in order of their perceived threat. He struck out first against Trotsky. Coupled with being a strong orator and brilliant strategist, Trotsky was a thorn in Stalin's flesh and they could not often see eye-to-eye which probably accounts for him being the first Stalin chose to position within his crosshair. Forming a triumvirate with Kamenev and Zinoviev, Stalin was able to oust Trotsky from the position of Commissar for War by ensuring that the 1925 Party Congress was attended by a pro-Stalin, anti-Trotsky audience. Having done so, he turned his sights on Kamenev and Zinoviev who suddenly realised their vulnerable position on the left. Their attempt to re-align themselves with Trotsky proved to be too little too late for Stalin had now an iron-fisted control over the party and was able to overturn their vote of no confidence with relative ease. ...read more.

Conclusion

Stalin was also able to exploit factionalism, which had been introduced by Lenin in order to ensure solidarity within the party, to use as a convenient excuse when he needed to oust any opponents he felt were obstacles to his ascension. To sum up, it would appear that Stalin adapted himself to the system in areas that were more conservative that would have been risky to adopt radical change to such as the need to keep congruence with Lenin's ideals and beliefs due to his god-like influence. At the same time, he adapted the system to himself after he had laid the groundwork and was sure there would not be any political backlash due to his radical actions. Not forgetting the favourable circumstances presented to him at that time, Stalin was certainly proactive in his actions and while it may be difficult to simply pick out whether Stalin had adapted to the system or adapted the system to suit him, one thing is certain. Stalin was certainly a manipulative chameleon. (1353 words) excl. footnotes 1 Srinivasan, Archana, Heroes of World War II (Sura Books (P) LTD, 2004) p. 6 2 Grey, Ian, Stalin, Man of History (Sphere, 1982) 3 Carr, E. H., Soviet Studies Volume V (Taylor & Francis, Ltd., 1953) p. 4 4 Willerton, John P., Patronage politics in the USSR (Cambridge, 1992) pp. 27-33 5 Lynch, Michael, From Autocracy to Communism: Russia 1894-1941 (Hodder Education, 2008) pp. 182-199 6 Service, Robert, Stalin: A biography (Pan, 2005) ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Stalins Russia, 1924-53 revision guide

    * Defence expenditure rose from 17% in 1940 to 60% in 1943. Retail trade fell by over 60% during the war. * Evacuation of industry east of the Urals began on 24 June 1941. Altogether, 50,000 workshops and 2,500 large factories were moved.

  2. Causes of show trials + purges of 1930s.

    Stalin was so strongly anti-religion because of his Marxist beliefs. Also because the Russian Orthodox Church had links with the tsars. Stalin changed so much about the way people worked. It must have come as a great shock to the people of Russia.

  1. Florence Nightingale is well known for her radical innovations in nursing care.

    There was not only a shortage of doctors and surgeons but not one qualified nurse in the whole of the British military hospital at Scutari. The French military had fifty Sisters of mercy in the Crimea [1]. The following year Florence Nightingale left her position in Harley Street to volunteer her services in Scutari.

  2. How and why did Stalin come to power?

    Of Stalin, in his testament Lenin commented, "Stalin has... immeasurable power" that he is "too rude" and proposed "to the comrades to find a way of removing Stalin". Lenin was seen as a god-like figure in Russia, a cult-hero, and if this had been published following Lenin's death then Stalin's political career would have been over.

  1. Compare the Characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin

    Assess the impact Lenin had on Russia and the Russian people In 1917, Russia, then known as the Soviet Union, was in utter chaos, the Russian people had had enough, there were food shortages, numerous strikes, freezing temperatures, million of soldiers had been killed at the front and most importantly there was an incompetent government.

  2. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    Thought that the generals were tortured into confessions as in 1957, a Soviet military court found no evidence of treason. 1. Since 1922, Red Army officers had been working with German officers on tactics and ideology, giving Stalin a reason to be suspicious.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work