• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Did the League fail in the 1930s due to bigger challenges unlike the 20s

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Did the League fail in the 1930s due to bigger challenges unlike the 20s There was self-interest in the league. The leading members were Britain and France; the league depended on the whole mostly from these two countries. But these two were not prepared to fight for the league because if they fought for the league they were in risk of losing most of their common interests. Like the crisis in Abyssinia where Britain just let Mussolini pass the Suez Canal with no obstruction. Economic sanctions didn't work because the main economic powers at the time weren't part of the league. Examples are the Russia and the U.S.A. the difference is that Russia at the end of the league it became a member, but the U.S.A. never became a member congress vetoed the decision to join the league. These were the biggest trade partners of nearly all the countries that's why they were ineffective Some of the treaties it had signed were seen harsh and unfair to many nations. ...read more.

Middle

The industry preferred Germany and the rural preferred Poland. The league divided this up the region and safeguarded the rail links and other important points like water and power. A good and peaceful solution to the problem Aaland Islands 1921. This crisis involves Sweden and Finland, which want control of the islands; they even prepared to fight for them. The League intervened saying the islands belonged to Finland, Sweden accepted the decision and a dispute was avoided. This was avoided because the Swedish made no retaliation. Corfu 1923. After the war this was like biggest dispute after the war. The crisis starts when a Italian General appointed by the League to view border control between Greece and Albania is assinated. Mussolini blamed Greek government for the assination. He demanded compensation by executing the murderers. Nothing was done and he bombed Corfu. Greece appealed at the League and the league condemned his actions but Greece was forced to compensate the Italians by paying them. ...read more.

Conclusion

Mussolini was very sneaky during the peace talks in the league his own Generals were preparing an even bigger offensive. The measures the league took were 0. They just talked. This was the biggest proof that the league was ineffective without Britain and France. I believe that the League doomed from the start. It could never have woked out with the problems stated above. All of these crisis were medium sized comparing them with Abyssinia or Manchuria where their were real wars fought. If a real crisis would up rise the League would definitely be ineffective and offer absolutely no protection at all. The challenges in the 30s were of no much bigger scale than the ones in the 20s. From the above statements I found out that the on first time it was called to intervene it was ineffective and that shows something. Without everybody present it was impossible to be successful and if there are countries not present like the USA it's impossible. Their were 2 countries which believed in the League to some extent this extent was as far as no British or French troops were harmed. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Why did the League of Nations fail?

    5 star(s)

    Economic sanctions were not viable because of the Great Depression and the fact that Japan was economically dependent upon the USA, which was in no condition to help China - historically its 'little brother'. Military sanctions were not an option primarily because of distance, and secondly Britain and France's reluctance to embark upon such a venture.

  2. To what extent was Hitlers rise to power due to Economic Problems?

    desperate people felt that previous politicians had failed them they looked for a way out of their terrible financial problems, if Hitler is promising to get rid of unemployment then seemingly this would be the right choice for them to take.

  1. Were the 1930's the Devils Decade or The Dawn of Affluence?

    Large corporate such as Woolworths, Sainsbury, Unilever and Dunlop dominated domestic markets and rationalisation of smaller companies became a tedious occurrence. Because of greater transportation of goods and growing demand for consumer goods (because of a sustained rise in real wages) the consumer goods industry boomed, similar to 1920's America.

  2. "The League of Nations representedno more than

    The Italians were eager for revenge against the Abyssinians because of their loss at the battle of Adowa, in 1898. Combining their will to revenge and their exploitation of the Leagues weakness, the Italians invaded Abyssinia. The league had to resolve this crisis if it was to survive, this wave of problems.

  1. Why was the League of Nations a failure in the 1930's?

    On February 24 the report was approved by 42 votes to 1 -only Japan voted against. After this 'insult' to Japan, it resigned from the League on 27th March 1933. It invaded Jehol the next week. The League was powerless to do anything-without the USA it could not discuss any real economic sanctions, s it was Japan's main trading partner.

  2. Causes of show trials + purges of 1930s.

    it met almost each and every one of the goals set out by the State Planning Commission. Even as many of Stalin's plans were succeeding in improving the Russian economy and the well being of the country's peasants, there was still a potential opposition to Stalin.

  1. Explain whether you agree or disagree with this statement - "The league of nations ...

    During the 1920's the League coped extremely well - it managed to keep the peace and avoided another war. Other than this there were many other successes of the league during the 20's. In 1920 it settled a land dispute between Finland and Sweden over the Aaland Islands.

  2. Why was the league so ineffective in dealing with the Abyssinian Crisis?

    to listen to it as the Italian leader Mussolini was quite prepared to go to war with Abyssinia. The question that the league had to take was what to do with Italy if they took this action. The problem that the league had was that the action they took depended

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work