• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Did the League fail in the 1930s due to bigger challenges unlike the 20s

Extracts from this document...


Did the League fail in the 1930s due to bigger challenges unlike the 20s There was self-interest in the league. The leading members were Britain and France; the league depended on the whole mostly from these two countries. But these two were not prepared to fight for the league because if they fought for the league they were in risk of losing most of their common interests. Like the crisis in Abyssinia where Britain just let Mussolini pass the Suez Canal with no obstruction. Economic sanctions didn't work because the main economic powers at the time weren't part of the league. Examples are the Russia and the U.S.A. the difference is that Russia at the end of the league it became a member, but the U.S.A. never became a member congress vetoed the decision to join the league. These were the biggest trade partners of nearly all the countries that's why they were ineffective Some of the treaties it had signed were seen harsh and unfair to many nations. ...read more.


The industry preferred Germany and the rural preferred Poland. The league divided this up the region and safeguarded the rail links and other important points like water and power. A good and peaceful solution to the problem Aaland Islands 1921. This crisis involves Sweden and Finland, which want control of the islands; they even prepared to fight for them. The League intervened saying the islands belonged to Finland, Sweden accepted the decision and a dispute was avoided. This was avoided because the Swedish made no retaliation. Corfu 1923. After the war this was like biggest dispute after the war. The crisis starts when a Italian General appointed by the League to view border control between Greece and Albania is assinated. Mussolini blamed Greek government for the assination. He demanded compensation by executing the murderers. Nothing was done and he bombed Corfu. Greece appealed at the League and the league condemned his actions but Greece was forced to compensate the Italians by paying them. ...read more.


Mussolini was very sneaky during the peace talks in the league his own Generals were preparing an even bigger offensive. The measures the league took were 0. They just talked. This was the biggest proof that the league was ineffective without Britain and France. I believe that the League doomed from the start. It could never have woked out with the problems stated above. All of these crisis were medium sized comparing them with Abyssinia or Manchuria where their were real wars fought. If a real crisis would up rise the League would definitely be ineffective and offer absolutely no protection at all. The challenges in the 30s were of no much bigger scale than the ones in the 20s. From the above statements I found out that the on first time it was called to intervene it was ineffective and that shows something. Without everybody present it was impossible to be successful and if there are countries not present like the USA it's impossible. Their were 2 countries which believed in the League to some extent this extent was as far as no British or French troops were harmed. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Why did the League of Nations fail?

    5 star(s)

    Japan created the puppet state of Manchukuo, and withdrew from the League after a report condemning the invasion was submitted to the League by Lord Lytton. The League was proved ineffective on the grounds that it could effectively do nothing else.

  2. Why was the League of Nations a failure in the 1930's?

    It was agreed by all that this was a League failure, but there were many excuses offered. Firstly Japan was so far away, and t did have a point when it claimed that China was itself in a state of anarchy.

  1. To what extent was Hitlers rise to power due to Economic Problems?

    This would answer the question that Hitler was not responsible for his rise to power. However, this is seemingly ridiculous as no one could have foreseen the effects that putting Hitler in power would have caused and from the facts we can see clearly that it was Hitler himself who

  2. Causes of show trials + purges of 1930s.

    a terrorist organization under the leadership of Trotsky[45] who had been exiled in 1927 and was now living in France. It was claimed that Trotsky had planned the assassination of Kirov, and that he was also in the process of planning assassinations of Stalin and many of his close followers.[46]

  1. Were the 1930's the Devils Decade or The Dawn of Affluence?

    Arguably the greatest reason for Britain's improving health however was our better diet. The consumption of fruit, vegetables and eggs with the reduction of consumption in bread and potatoes meant the average Briton had a more balanced diet. However there is a reason that the 1930's is connected with malnutrition

  2. Hitlers Germany

    There can be no denying that Hitler's Germany was indeed guilty of these crimes. There are, however, as Jaspers points out, types of guilt, which he labels as criminal guilt, political guilt, moral guilt, and metaphysical guilt." Criminal guilt involves anyone who committed a crime under unequivocal laws, with jurisdiction resting with the court.

  1. Explain whether you agree or disagree with this statement - "The league of nations ...

    Despite these successes there were also a few issues where the league was deemed as a failure. For example the Polish army seized the capital of Lithuania, Vilna, and the league at first took no action but then decided that Poland could keep the town.

  2. "The League of Nations representedno more than

    The league already had discredited its name with its failures, however if it failed to resolve this crisis it would be completely disregarded by the world. The league had failed to use sanctions effectively against the Italians, during October, 1935.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work