• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Did The Legacy Of The 1848 Revolutions Play a Major Role In The Eventual Unification Of Italy

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Did The Legacy Of The 1848 Revolutions Play a Major Role In The Eventual Unification Of Italy? Yes the legacy did play a major role because it set the scene for unification to happen by leading to the development of piedmont and allowing Italians to learn the lessons of needing foreign support, but this was a long term cause and needed Cavour and Garibaldi to take advantage of the legacy for full unification to happen. In the post-revolutionary decade after 1848, little had visibly changed, and some historians consider the revolutions a failure, given the seeming lack of permanent structural changes. ...read more.

Middle

This meant that free thinkers who craved political freedom flocked to Piedmont. This allowed Piedmont to develop politically and to become the dominant state in Italy On March 22 Piedmont declared War on Austria. The Piedmontese army lead by Charles Albert in person, invaded Lombardy. Troops from all across Italy converged to join the Piedmontese army, to purge Italy of Austria once and for all. However, the French Army helped Austria to gain back Lombardy, the outlook for Charles albert was defeat. The lesson learned here was that you could not defeat Austria without foreign support. This led to Cavour striving to gain an ally. ...read more.

Conclusion

If it wasn't for Garibaldi's actions in Sicily and Naples, Italy would have remained only partly unified. Overall, the legacy of the revolutions set the scene for the unification of Italy by Developing Piedmont as the dominant state in Italy, centralising those who wanted unification in one place. However, it needed a skilled politician, in the form of Cavour, to take advantage of the situation and put Piedmont onto the world stage, which allowed a piedmont/French alliance to develop and expel Austria, but it was the actions of Garibaldi which allowed full unification to take place. The legacy of 1848 certainly played a major role in unification, however it needed individuals to learn from the legacy for Italy to become one state. Top of Form ?? ?? ?? ?? Alex White ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. What were the obstacles to German Unification immediatly before the 1848 Revolutions

    students, lawyers, teachers like it did in France in the 1780's. In order to stop the cause of unification developing he exaggerated the importance of students and the murder of Kotzebue this enabled him to take action against Nationalism, this actions consisted of the Carlsbad Degrees which enforced strict censor

  2. Why did the 1848 revolutions in italy fail?

    However, this wouldn't have been possible for the French if it wasn't for the Pope's support. The French finally destroyed Roman Republic and reinstated the Pope in June 1848; this was a humiliating failure for Mazzini who was a possible leader for a unified Italy.

  1. Compare & Contrast Cavour & Garibaldi's Contributions to the Unification.

    In contrast, Garibaldi believed in the Mazzinian ideal of Italy making itself (Italia fara da se). Additionally, he had great disdain for Cavour after Savoy and, more importantly, Nice (Garibaldi's birthplace) was given to France. However, it was clear that French intervention was necessary and the idea of Italy being 'fertilised by the blood of martyrs' was no longer relevant.

  2. Compare and contrast the situation in Italy 1919-22 with that in Germany 1919-29.

    The war left the Germans with the worst end of the deal. This meant that the German politicians were faced with the much harder task than their Italian counterparts. The fact that Stresemann managed to control the situation create a better Germany in terms of economy, jobs and so on

  1. Why did the Revolutions of 1848 did not lead to a united Germany?

    was overthrown in France it was a cataclysmic event that caused the middle classes to emerge at the forefront of German politics (Frankfurt Parliament). By its name 'Liberalism' it is clear to see what Liberals wanted, they wanted more personal freedom for themselves and the German speaking peoples.

  2. Compare and contrast Cavour and Garibaldi's contributions to Unification.

    Essentially, Cavour was a conservative and an opponent of Mazzinian views. He was also a liberal in many respects and a socialist opposer.

  1. Why were there two revolutions in Russiain 1917?

    In the Provisional Government the moderates wanted a continuation of the war. The Bolsheviks, outside the Provisional Government, called for immediate peace "without annexations and reparations." The Soviets were uncertain what policy to adopt: they realized that the people were tired of war but did not want to risk a complete military collapse.

  2. Explain the role of Czechoslovakia in the appeasement story.

    Thus Hitler stepped up the army manoeuvres which was previously not his intension and brought them right up to Czechoslovakia border, trying to provoke the Czech people. In 1938 Britain and France were having discussions about the Czechoslovakia situations. As there was a possibly of a crisis the British view

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work