• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Did The Legacy Of The 1848 Revolutions Play a Major Role In The Eventual Unification Of Italy

Extracts from this document...


Did The Legacy Of The 1848 Revolutions Play a Major Role In The Eventual Unification Of Italy? Yes the legacy did play a major role because it set the scene for unification to happen by leading to the development of piedmont and allowing Italians to learn the lessons of needing foreign support, but this was a long term cause and needed Cavour and Garibaldi to take advantage of the legacy for full unification to happen. In the post-revolutionary decade after 1848, little had visibly changed, and some historians consider the revolutions a failure, given the seeming lack of permanent structural changes. ...read more.


This meant that free thinkers who craved political freedom flocked to Piedmont. This allowed Piedmont to develop politically and to become the dominant state in Italy On March 22 Piedmont declared War on Austria. The Piedmontese army lead by Charles Albert in person, invaded Lombardy. Troops from all across Italy converged to join the Piedmontese army, to purge Italy of Austria once and for all. However, the French Army helped Austria to gain back Lombardy, the outlook for Charles albert was defeat. The lesson learned here was that you could not defeat Austria without foreign support. This led to Cavour striving to gain an ally. ...read more.


If it wasn't for Garibaldi's actions in Sicily and Naples, Italy would have remained only partly unified. Overall, the legacy of the revolutions set the scene for the unification of Italy by Developing Piedmont as the dominant state in Italy, centralising those who wanted unification in one place. However, it needed a skilled politician, in the form of Cavour, to take advantage of the situation and put Piedmont onto the world stage, which allowed a piedmont/French alliance to develop and expel Austria, but it was the actions of Garibaldi which allowed full unification to take place. The legacy of 1848 certainly played a major role in unification, however it needed individuals to learn from the legacy for Italy to become one state. Top of Form ?? ?? ?? ?? Alex White ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Why did the 1848 revolutions in italy fail?

    However, this wouldn't have been possible for the French if it wasn't for the Pope's support. The French finally destroyed Roman Republic and reinstated the Pope in June 1848; this was a humiliating failure for Mazzini who was a possible leader for a unified Italy.

  2. What were the obstacles to German Unification immediatly before the 1848 Revolutions

    autocrats as leaders who had treated them badly, again as liberalism is a fundamental part of unification it could not be expressed while Metternich was in power. Also Metternich knew if there was going to be a revolt for a unified Germany it would come from the educated middle classes e.g.

  1. Compare & Contrast Cavour & Garibaldi's Contributions to the Unification.

    In contrast, Garibaldi believed in the Mazzinian ideal of Italy making itself (Italia fara da se). Additionally, he had great disdain for Cavour after Savoy and, more importantly, Nice (Garibaldi's birthplace) was given to France. However, it was clear that French intervention was necessary and the idea of Italy being 'fertilised by the blood of martyrs' was no longer relevant.

  2. Compare and contrast the situation in Italy 1919-22 with that in Germany 1919-29.

    This concept would be somehow close to what John Locke would preach. Even though a new government was laid out hyperinflation had hit Germany and a new leader was needed thus this led into the Stresemann era of the Weimar Republic expanding from 1923-1929.

  1. Why did the Revolutions of 1848 did not lead to a united Germany?

    was overthrown in France it was a cataclysmic event that caused the middle classes to emerge at the forefront of German politics (Frankfurt Parliament). By its name 'Liberalism' it is clear to see what Liberals wanted, they wanted more personal freedom for themselves and the German speaking peoples.

  2. Explain the role of Czechoslovakia in the appeasement story.

    Therefore, Russia was in a good position to lie by saying that they would have come if French had mobilised. So even if the French had mobilised there is doubt whether the Russians would have come and how effective they would have been.

  1. Compare and contrast Cavour and Garibaldi's contributions to Unification.

    Cavour did not originally favour unification. He was more interested in the self-aggrandisement of Piedmont. When he met with Napoleon III at Plombieres, all he wanted was for Piedmont to annexe Lombardy and Venetia and rid the new state of the Austrian influence.

  2. Discuss Hitler’s eventual gaining of Lebensraum. Was it merely opportunistic or astutely ...

    The statements made by Hitler are known as the ' Hossbach memorandum ' named after the man who wrote it. Taylor speculates that this is suppose to contain Hitler's plan's so hence the historical significance of the statements. On the 5th of November Hitler called a conference in the Chancellery.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work