• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Did the Russians revolutions improve the lives of ordinary Russians, 1914-1924?

Extracts from this document...


Did the Russians revolutions improve the lives of ordinary Russians, 1914-1924? When Tsar Nicholas II ruled Russia life was quite good the peasants loved the Tsar as 'their father'. The Romanov dynasty had been going since 1613 and the celebration of the 300th year ruling, which gave the Tsar popularity. The powerful church even supported the Romanov, which made them even more popular. Both the government and the army where ruled by nobles. There was a secret police and there was a press censorship. Russia had lost the war with Japan in 1904. Most of the population where peasants so that means that most of the population supported the Tsar. The peasants where controlled by nobles. In Russia there where three classes these where the upper class, the middle class or the Bourgeoisie and the lower class or the Proletariats. Russia was just starting to become industrialised and the town and factories where starting to grow up. But they lived in poor conditions and there was workers poverty. The middle class, were beginning to want a say in the way the country was ruled. ...read more.


There is then a second revolution in Russia in October/November the provisional Government was overthrown by the Bolsheviks led by Lenin. This was an organised revolution. Lenin set up a communist state before he died in 1924. Lenin got communist control of Russia between 1918 and 1924. Communist revolutionaries killed the royal family in 1918, who had caused all the trouble in Russia. Communist control gave Lenin state control of key industries, state control of banks, state control of railways, removal of grain from peasants by seizure or taxation and a new constitution creating the USSR. The Bolsheviks had taken control of Petrograd in November 1917 and it took three years for them to control the rest of Russia and only after a civil war. In the civil war Lenin led the red army, he was fighting against the white army who where a collection of the Tsars supporters. Some countries like Japan, France, Britain, USA and Czechoslovakia supported the white army. To help the red army Lenin's rule about all the peasants surplus grain being taken from them came into action. It feed the red army and made sure they did not go hungry Lenin cared more about his army than his people. ...read more.


Tsar Nicholas introduced a Duma, which did no good because if they did not agree with the Tsar then the Tsar would simply get a new one. Rich land owner owned much more land than anybody else and also there was a large gap between rich and poor. Some of Lenin was that no one was better than anybody else. The peasants where aloud as much land as the nobles. No one had to do more work than anybody else. Lenin withdrew them from World War One but then started a civil War, which killed many people. Lenin set up a Government, which could be elected into power. They did not win the election so Lenin called the whole thing off. I think that Russia was better under the control of neither of these men but I think that they where slightly better off under the control of Lenin because after the Civil War everything was fine. The peasants got to keep their grain and when the New Economic Policy was introduced the factories and small industries where handed back to their owners. No one was better than anyone else and everyone was aloud the same amount of land with the new land decree. Heather Bibby ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Why Were There Two Revolutions in Russia in 1917?

    The Soviet could effectively control the country through its workers, as factories only became operational once the Soviet ordered strikes to cease. This gave rise to the quote by Georgii Lvov (Prime Minister in the Provisional Government) that 'the Workman's Soviet is a power without authority'.

  2. How secure was the Tsars power up to 1904

    countered by: "...another child had written to the Czar, the Little Father, as they call him, and for their pains more than one has felt the knout and the Cossack's whip" (same source). Such duality mirrored Alexander II's reign.

  1. Alexander II did little to really improve the lives of the Russian people

    The creation of the zemstvo as new representative bodies for the people in 1864 may seem as a huge improvement for the lives of the Russian people - as do the Dumas set up in 1870; it is important to note that in larger cities, commandants ran the Dumas and

  2. Why were there two revolutions in Russia in 1917? What were the results of ...

    Russia's poorly developed industry could not produce the necessary war equipment. Communications were inadequate and could not provide the front with sufficient soldiers or supplies. There were virtually no medical supplies for injured soldiers or no facilities. The Russian Army suffered many disastrous defeats.

  1. The Russian Revolutions of 1917

    They wanted representation in government. They also wanted a free-press to publish their views. Short Term Factors Short term factors included the vast amounts of food shortages and Russian casualties in the frontline. Tsar had gone off to lead his troops (linking the monarchy to the Russian military)

  2. Why were there two revolutions in Russiain 1917?

    Paul Miliukov became Foreign Minister and Alexander Kerensky the Minister of Justice, representing left- wing liberals. The general aim of this government is clear enough: to make a political revolution, not a social revolution. Yet social reform if not social revolution was necessary in the existing conditions of agrarian unrest and dissatisfaction of the industrial proletariat.

  1. Compare and Contrast the February and October Revolutions in Russia.

    Knowing this, the tzar and his family were first sent from St. Petersburg to Siberia, and finally to Yekaterinburg. There, in the summer of 1918, a troop of the Red Guard assassinated the entire Romanov family including Nicholas II?s five children and his wife.

  2. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    However, instead of being enthusiastic, workers became increasingly disillusioned with the bid to become a Socialist country. Workers boycotted factory committee elections and trade unions, and unemployed workers protested ï many arrests. However, the authorities would not admit that they were to blame, as that would be saying Stalin was wrong.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work