• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Did the Russians revolutions improve the lives of ordinary Russians, 1914-1924?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Did the Russians revolutions improve the lives of ordinary Russians, 1914-1924? When Tsar Nicholas II ruled Russia life was quite good the peasants loved the Tsar as 'their father'. The Romanov dynasty had been going since 1613 and the celebration of the 300th year ruling, which gave the Tsar popularity. The powerful church even supported the Romanov, which made them even more popular. Both the government and the army where ruled by nobles. There was a secret police and there was a press censorship. Russia had lost the war with Japan in 1904. Most of the population where peasants so that means that most of the population supported the Tsar. The peasants where controlled by nobles. In Russia there where three classes these where the upper class, the middle class or the Bourgeoisie and the lower class or the Proletariats. Russia was just starting to become industrialised and the town and factories where starting to grow up. But they lived in poor conditions and there was workers poverty. The middle class, were beginning to want a say in the way the country was ruled. ...read more.

Middle

There is then a second revolution in Russia in October/November the provisional Government was overthrown by the Bolsheviks led by Lenin. This was an organised revolution. Lenin set up a communist state before he died in 1924. Lenin got communist control of Russia between 1918 and 1924. Communist revolutionaries killed the royal family in 1918, who had caused all the trouble in Russia. Communist control gave Lenin state control of key industries, state control of banks, state control of railways, removal of grain from peasants by seizure or taxation and a new constitution creating the USSR. The Bolsheviks had taken control of Petrograd in November 1917 and it took three years for them to control the rest of Russia and only after a civil war. In the civil war Lenin led the red army, he was fighting against the white army who where a collection of the Tsars supporters. Some countries like Japan, France, Britain, USA and Czechoslovakia supported the white army. To help the red army Lenin's rule about all the peasants surplus grain being taken from them came into action. It feed the red army and made sure they did not go hungry Lenin cared more about his army than his people. ...read more.

Conclusion

Tsar Nicholas introduced a Duma, which did no good because if they did not agree with the Tsar then the Tsar would simply get a new one. Rich land owner owned much more land than anybody else and also there was a large gap between rich and poor. Some of Lenin was that no one was better than anybody else. The peasants where aloud as much land as the nobles. No one had to do more work than anybody else. Lenin withdrew them from World War One but then started a civil War, which killed many people. Lenin set up a Government, which could be elected into power. They did not win the election so Lenin called the whole thing off. I think that Russia was better under the control of neither of these men but I think that they where slightly better off under the control of Lenin because after the Civil War everything was fine. The peasants got to keep their grain and when the New Economic Policy was introduced the factories and small industries where handed back to their owners. No one was better than anyone else and everyone was aloud the same amount of land with the new land decree. Heather Bibby ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Alexander II did little to really improve the lives of the Russian people

    The creation of the zemstvo as new representative bodies for the people in 1864 may seem as a huge improvement for the lives of the Russian people - as do the Dumas set up in 1870; it is important to note that in larger cities, commandants ran the Dumas and

  2. How secure was the Tsars power up to 1904

    After a number of attempts on his life, Alexander II was assassinated in 1881. Following the assassination of his father, Alexander III was determined to wage war against all political opponents. He was helped by the fact that most ordinary Russians shared his feelings and turned against revolutionary groups.

  1. The Russian Revolutions of 1917

    Economic chaos drove the Russians to revolt, the working class contempt of the regime had now swept into the middle-class, Russia was starting to unite under the disillusionment of the regime . Food shortages meant that in January 1917 food shipments fell by 60%, leaving the population starving.

  2. Why were there two revolutions in Russiain 1917?

    At this time the Social Revolutionaries dominated the Soviet since they represent the peasants, Russia's clear majority. Next in importance are the Mensheviks and the Bolsheviks, in that order. Members had been elected in factories, workshops, and military barracks. There were a total of 2,500 representatives: one worker for each 1000 workers and one soldier for each company.

  1. Why Were There Two Revolutions in Russia in 1917?

    This type of thinking was encouraged by many revolutionary and Marxist groups at the time, who used the war to their advantage. They claimed that the war was the result of a family spat of the tsars, and that the war was for the sake of money.

  2. Why were there two revolutions in Russia in 1917? What were the results of ...

    Russia was totally unprepared for a modern war. Her leadership was incompetent and her communications were disorganised. The Minister of War was completely out of touch with modern weapons and twentieth century warfare, arms were in short supply. Bullets were rationed and artillery guns were limited to two or three shells per day.

  1. Compare and Contrast the February and October Revolutions in Russia.

    By doing so, Lenin finally didn?t have to worry about Russia?s people doubting his right to rule. After this event, Lenin had taken over Russia, and led the Bolsheviks to superiority in Russia. Ultimately, in 1952 the Bolshevik Party was renamed into the Communist Party and made up the government of the Soviet Union under the rule of Joseph Stalin.

  2. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    Gosplan coordinated the plan at the centre. The impact of the terror on the economy: Hundreds of officials were removed from Gosplan and other similar agencies. Twelve thousand workers were promoted to their places. The Central Statistical Administration was closed in 1929 and Gosplan took over its activities, so that statistics could be altered etc.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work