• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Did the Second World War cause a social revolution in Britain?

Extracts from this document...


Did the Second World War cause a social revolution in Britain? World War Two encouraged and was a catalyst for social revolution in Britain after 1945. The war confronted Britain with many new social challenges and situations that had never been encountered before. However, it is debatable to what extent the social reform lasted and how strong its impact remains today. It is extremely clear that a social reform took place in Britain post World War Two for reasons including shared experiences and conscription. The impacts of certain factors did vary in strength and over time. It is evident that some factors still remain such as women in work but other factors such as propaganda were weak and therefore did not endure. The power of the Trade Unions had a strong long term social effect after World War Two. We are able to establish this because the support of trade unions themselves increased during 1946, rising from 6,298,000 to 8,803,000. Many of these new members were women following the dramatic increase of women working during the war years. With the trade unions having more supporters this meant that their strikes would have more impact putting more pressure on the government and employers therefore increasing their bargaining power as the government would try and do anything to prevent a strike on a massive scale. ...read more.


Changes in the role of women has been a significant long term social effect from world war two. Women had a first chance to work to contribute to the war effort, despite them loosing their jobs at the end of the war when the soldiers returned , but after women of all classes of working it was widely acceptable for women to work and it also made women want to work hence the campaigns of the suffragettes and suffragists. Despite there being countless long term social effects there is enough short term effects to balance out the strength of the social revolution caused by World War Two. An obvious short term effect of the war was the idea of a "Classless society" after the war classes no longer worked together and felt united , this was due to working and lower class citizens returning to work in factories , whereas the upper class returned to their stately homes and working as bankers, their lives returned to how they were before the war apart from the memories of shared experiences throughout the war Churchill's support was a clear short term effect of World War Two , Churchill made a speech in the march of 1943 strongly supporting a social revolution including full employment and the emphasis of national insurance and support for improvement in ...read more.


This was due to the UK and USA being in Alliance with the USSR during the war therefore British citizens were more acceptant of it. We are able to recognise this as a short term social effect due to the red scare in the 50's and the cold war from 1950's-1990 therefore the acceptance of communism only lasted for a maximum of five years before the un-acceptance of communism returned. This was also because Capitalism had been discredited before the war due to the Wall Street Crash and the Great Depression in America. After the war the idea of building a new society was largely accepted after the amazing war effort and the effects of the war on Britain itself. this therefore shows that communism caused social change due to more people being acceptant of it which resulted in more British voting for the labour party. The war caused many situation or circumstance where a wide cross section of society came into contact , co-operated and shared experience in the trauma of war and the adversity it brought. The nation and all its people were entitled by a common course , fighting the war and keeping our independence. Many of these influences were short term experiences , however some were cabalists of other culture such as "Americanisation" and a great sense that we were one nation rather than a class dominated culture. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. How far was British society changed by the experiences of the Second World War? ...

    Rationing changed British society as it meant that the poorest of the poor actually got the right amount of food for once and were generally healthier and Rationing continued until 1954 so that families could get afford the food again.

  2. Industrial Revolution

    Indeed, it can be argued that the all-encompassing Empire of the latter part of Queen Victoria's reign could not have occurred without the impetus of the inexorable industrial revolution beforehand. The invention of steam alone necessitated a rail work and domestic infrastructure capable of supporting an empire and, of course,

  1. To what extent was there a social and economic revolution in Britain after ...

    Economically, Britain wasn't as badly damaged as other European countries, such as France and Germany - however, it still required drastic action. In 1946, a world-wide wheat shortage necessitated bread-rationing, and from 1946-1947, there was even a ration on simple things to grow such as potatoes.

  2. The Crash.

    His wife promised him fish and rice. She was a housewife so she had plenty of time to do housework and improve her cooking skills. Richard usually loved the food that his wife cooked for him and he always said that she was the best cook in the world.

  1. How united was Britain in 1688?

    Specific divisions between monarch and nobility must have arisen in order that matters of policy became a cause of division. Given these projections we can further order our analysis of the unity of the British body politic in 1688. There are three areas of political unity that are of specific

  2. How close to revolution was Great Britain in the 1790s?

    And this is why in 1799 Pitt took the decision to effectively abolish all trade unions when he banned the ?combination? of men, and this helped to partly eliminate the danger of (dissatisfied) working men along with their union trying to cause trouble for the government, hence why many saw this as a very good measure taken by Pitt.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work