• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss relations between the United States of America and the Soviet Union from 1917 to 1945.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Discuss relations between the United States of America and the Soviet Union from 1917 to 1945. The period between 1917 and 1945 saw several major changes in the relationship between the USA and Russia. Although traditionally the two countries were had had a harmonious relationship, it had been clear for some time before the Russian Revolutions that interests were diverging. The next 28 years saw the relationship between the two on a rollercoaster ride, which was underwritten by mistrust and ideological disparities, but punctuated by self-interest and necessity. 1917 was a tumultuous year for Russian leadership and saw two dramatic turns in relations between the USA and Russia. Wilsonian America was not displeased by the removal of Tsar Nicholas ii from power in Russia, and seemed to regard the putting in place of a provisional government in keeping with Wilson's ideas about self-determination, which he had discussed on 22nd January 1917 on Capitol Hill. The new Russian regime promised to remain involved in WWI against Germany, and seemed on the surface to be a democratic government, despite its underlying weaknesses. The Duma was almost immediately recognised as the legitimate government of Russia by the USA, and on a more personal level, both Wilson and Roosevelt spoke out in favour of closer ties with Russia. LaFeber argues that this turn of events in Russia played a part in Wilson's decision to go to war, if not quite ...read more.

Middle

The economic relationship that had grown up between the two countries, and the fact that the USA was the only major country not to have recognised the SU resulted in pressure on the USA to formally recognise the Bolshevik government. In 1931 the Manchurian crisis led many to see the problems that could occur. Although the USA and SU had a common aim, they were unable to collaborate in any concerted action, as, officially, the USA refused to believe that the SU existed! In the event, it was the growing power of Germany and Japan that led to recognition. It seemed necessary that they should pursue the common aim of keeping these two threats under control, and thus they engaged in the Roosevelt-Litvinov agreements. Despite the promise of better relations that these talks seemed to afford, it quickly transpired that each side had misunderstood the others intentions, and in reality, neither side was happy with the others terms. By 1934 it was generally accepted that 'the honeymoon atmosphere has evaporated completely' . Gaddis argues that both sides expected too much form recognition. Russia had expected the relationship to help counter-balance the growth of Germany and Japan, while in reality, at this stage Roosevelt was more concerned with Comintern activities, and The USA had expected the behaviour of the SU to change in order to become more acceptable to the USA, which was never an option to Stalin. ...read more.

Conclusion

Two days before Russia was due to join the war against Japan, the USA dropped an atomic bomb on Hiroshima, thus ending the war very swiftly. The USA saw the bomb as having the side effect of evening out their position with the SU, and giving them a stronger bargaining position, but there was an underestimation of just how great the mutual mistrust was. Russia was disturbed by the strength of the weapon, and saw it a s a threat, and we can certainly say that in terms of the next few decades, the existence of nuclear capability shaped almost every aspect of USA/SU relations. The most common question asked by historians in the study of this period is 'Can we say from this that the Cold War was inevitable?' I feel that while inevitable is too strong a word, we can certainly see the seeds of the Cold war being sowed in this period. The behaviour of the two countries during this period is echoed and exaggerated in the years to come, but most is already in place by 1945. Ideological conflict, lack of communication, mistrust, fear and inconsistency punctuated the cold war, and all of these things can be seen in the period discussed here. It seems that the Cold war was simply an escalation of such feelings and events, rather than something new that emerged from them. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Superpower Relations 1945-90

    (In Czechoslovakia the leaders were murdered.) For example, in Poland, Stalin arrested many members of the popular Peasant Party, and stopped candidates standing for election. Its leader fled the country. Poles were anti-communist and anti-soviet, yet the communists won a landslide in the elections of 1947.

  2. “Generals Win Battles, Resources Win Wars”. How Far Does Your Study of the Period ...

    of resources would eliminate the time it had taken in previous conflicts, a prime example being the wars of succession, for the pressure of resource superiority to come into effect - thus significantly shortening the war in the favour of the prepared.

  1. This graduation paper is about U.S. - Soviet relations in Cold War period. Our ...

    It wished territorial boundaries that would reflect the concessions won through military conflict. All these objectives-potentially-ran counter to the Atlantic Charter. Roosevelt himself-never afraid of inconsistency-often talked the same language. Frequently, he spoke of guaranteeing the USSR "measures of legitimate security" on territorial questions, and he envisioned a postwar world in which the "four policemen"-the superpowers-would manage the world.

  2. What were the causes of the disintegration of the Soviet Union as a socialist ...

    In World War 2, he also played a key role in organising guerrilla warfare defences of the Ukraine, once again supporting the Soviet Union. There is also evidence to suggest that Khruschev acted only in what he saw was the best way to further socialism in the Soviet Union.

  1. The Space Race was a product of the Cold War. Two countries were involved, ...

    beach ball that sent a signal of beep beep beep that could be heard on a ham radio (Irvine 2006, para 24). The Sputnik launch into space was a very important historical event because it led to the formation of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration otherwise famously known as NASA.

  2. UNIT 6: PAPER 6b: THE SOVIET UNION AFTER LENIN

    * Many questioned the validity of building the first communist state by capitalist means. By 1923-24 the economy had largely reached pre-war levels of food production. * All agreed on the need for large-scale industrialisation, after all Marxists believed in the supremacy of the workers.

  1. Cold war 1945-1953 - characterize the soviet policy according germany after 1945 [to the ...

    on Ussr's part separateness, USSr said that W.countries have no right to do it, blockede of W sectors > Stalin hoped that if us leve berlin, then he could force them to leave GER > Roads, railroads , canals blocked, electricity cut off > Nov 48, separate municipial elections; eastern

  2. China's Relationship With The West

    one person, sometimes a Chinese dissident, and what he has been through which does put pressure on China. A final minor thing that puts pressure on China is International Organisations such as the European Union who maintain that China has to be treated differently because of their terrible human rights record.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work