• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss relations between the United States of America and the Soviet Union from 1917 to 1945.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Discuss relations between the United States of America and the Soviet Union from 1917 to 1945. The period between 1917 and 1945 saw several major changes in the relationship between the USA and Russia. Although traditionally the two countries were had had a harmonious relationship, it had been clear for some time before the Russian Revolutions that interests were diverging. The next 28 years saw the relationship between the two on a rollercoaster ride, which was underwritten by mistrust and ideological disparities, but punctuated by self-interest and necessity. 1917 was a tumultuous year for Russian leadership and saw two dramatic turns in relations between the USA and Russia. Wilsonian America was not displeased by the removal of Tsar Nicholas ii from power in Russia, and seemed to regard the putting in place of a provisional government in keeping with Wilson's ideas about self-determination, which he had discussed on 22nd January 1917 on Capitol Hill. The new Russian regime promised to remain involved in WWI against Germany, and seemed on the surface to be a democratic government, despite its underlying weaknesses. The Duma was almost immediately recognised as the legitimate government of Russia by the USA, and on a more personal level, both Wilson and Roosevelt spoke out in favour of closer ties with Russia. LaFeber argues that this turn of events in Russia played a part in Wilson's decision to go to war, if not quite ...read more.

Middle

The economic relationship that had grown up between the two countries, and the fact that the USA was the only major country not to have recognised the SU resulted in pressure on the USA to formally recognise the Bolshevik government. In 1931 the Manchurian crisis led many to see the problems that could occur. Although the USA and SU had a common aim, they were unable to collaborate in any concerted action, as, officially, the USA refused to believe that the SU existed! In the event, it was the growing power of Germany and Japan that led to recognition. It seemed necessary that they should pursue the common aim of keeping these two threats under control, and thus they engaged in the Roosevelt-Litvinov agreements. Despite the promise of better relations that these talks seemed to afford, it quickly transpired that each side had misunderstood the others intentions, and in reality, neither side was happy with the others terms. By 1934 it was generally accepted that 'the honeymoon atmosphere has evaporated completely' . Gaddis argues that both sides expected too much form recognition. Russia had expected the relationship to help counter-balance the growth of Germany and Japan, while in reality, at this stage Roosevelt was more concerned with Comintern activities, and The USA had expected the behaviour of the SU to change in order to become more acceptable to the USA, which was never an option to Stalin. ...read more.

Conclusion

Two days before Russia was due to join the war against Japan, the USA dropped an atomic bomb on Hiroshima, thus ending the war very swiftly. The USA saw the bomb as having the side effect of evening out their position with the SU, and giving them a stronger bargaining position, but there was an underestimation of just how great the mutual mistrust was. Russia was disturbed by the strength of the weapon, and saw it a s a threat, and we can certainly say that in terms of the next few decades, the existence of nuclear capability shaped almost every aspect of USA/SU relations. The most common question asked by historians in the study of this period is 'Can we say from this that the Cold War was inevitable?' I feel that while inevitable is too strong a word, we can certainly see the seeds of the Cold war being sowed in this period. The behaviour of the two countries during this period is echoed and exaggerated in the years to come, but most is already in place by 1945. Ideological conflict, lack of communication, mistrust, fear and inconsistency punctuated the cold war, and all of these things can be seen in the period discussed here. It seems that the Cold war was simply an escalation of such feelings and events, rather than something new that emerged from them. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Superpower Relations 1945-90

    (In Czechoslovakia the leaders were murdered.) For example, in Poland, Stalin arrested many members of the popular Peasant Party, and stopped candidates standing for election. Its leader fled the country. Poles were anti-communist and anti-soviet, yet the communists won a landslide in the elections of 1947.

  2. “Generals Win Battles, Resources Win Wars”. How Far Does Your Study of the Period ...

    as a result of the railway's arrival. This fast method of transportation offered speed of victory over opponents that no general had ever been able to consider before, and could not possibly emulate if restricted to traditional methods to move armies - that generals like Moltke relied on the railway

  1. This graduation paper is about U.S. - Soviet relations in Cold War period. Our ...

    direct threat to the most cherished American beliefs in freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and freedom of occupational choice. When German actions corroborated the president's simple words, the opportunity presented itself for carrying the nation toward another great crusade on behalf of democracy, freedom, and peace.

  2. What were the causes of the disintegration of the Soviet Union as a socialist ...

    he did very little different that what had been done before in emphasising a commitment to the party and utilising people as the soviets key resource. Set against this background, it does seem unfair to criticise Khruschev as being a socialist traitor, and, as with the predetermination theory, I feel

  1. The Space Race was a product of the Cold War. Two countries were involved, ...

    beach ball that sent a signal of beep beep beep that could be heard on a ham radio (Irvine 2006, para 24). The Sputnik launch into space was a very important historical event because it led to the formation of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration otherwise famously known as NASA.

  2. UNIT 6: PAPER 6b: THE SOVIET UNION AFTER LENIN

    * Many questioned the validity of building the first communist state by capitalist means. By 1923-24 the economy had largely reached pre-war levels of food production. * All agreed on the need for large-scale industrialisation, after all Marxists believed in the supremacy of the workers.

  1. Was the cold war conflict precipitated by an expansionist soviet union or were U.S ...

    that Russia wanted fair reparations for the extra losses the country had to bear; the soviet army had already begun to strip German factories of any material that was thought to carry some value. The resulting conflict left Germany divided into four zones, one for each of the victors.

  2. How far was the defeat of Germany in 1945 the most important turning point ...

    played a key role in international relations over the period of 1879 ? 1980 but the defeat of Germany was a crucial turning point for International relations, it created conflict, mistrust and ended up dividing Europe. Without its defeat there would not have been the creation of the Berlin Blockade and the Cold War.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work