• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss the claim that Stalin(TM)s actions in Eastern Europe during 1944 and 1945 were the most important reason for disputes between the wartime allies at the time.

Extracts from this document...


Discuss the claim that Stalin's actions in Eastern Europe during 1944 and 1945 were the most important reason for disputes between the wartime allies at the time. Passages Paper. There has been many controversial points raised about the wartime relationship between the USA, the USSR and Great Britain; some historians assert that Stalin's actions in Eastern Europe were the most vital of the disputes between the wartime allies, others disagree. The question refers to Stalin's actions in Eastern Europe; source D illustrates negative action taken by Stalin regarding Poland. It's a fairly orthodox view that Stalin deliberately halted at the Vistula River "and allowed the Nazis to return and crush the Poles." Approximately 200,000 Poles were killed in the Warsaw rising that went unaided. Stalin was not prepared to see an unfriendly government of Poland considering its vital position; this slaughter left Poland crippled creating the perfect opportunity for Stalin to "hand Poland over to his Puppets." ...read more.


Although there seems to be an air of agreement at this meeting, there is a worrying factor: Stalin's casual way in which he deals with the fate of millions. Churchill in his book claimed he said to Stalin: "Might it not be thought rather cynical if it had seemed we had disposed of these issues, so fateful to millions of people, in such an offhand manner? Let us burn the paper." To which Stalin replied "No, you keep it," This perhaps suggests the worrying issue that Stalin is not interested in written agreements and is quite willing to adept them to his own will. This will have of course caused concern but the validity of the source must be accounted for; it's from Churchill's book with the very dramatic title "Triumph and Tragedy" suggesting possible bias from an orthodox view. Another action of Stalin that caused disputes was his insistence on opening a Second Front. ...read more.


Stalin seems to have taken the majority of wrong action here yet the dropping of the atomic bomb was a vital decision that excluded Stalin. Despite McCauley's claim that "Roosevelt hoped to create post-war partnership with Stalin" disputes at Yalta and Potsdam suggest an important dispute between the wartime allies at the time. Some of the disputes discussed in all four sources suggest Stalin's actions in Eastern Europe to be the cause. Certainly all Stalin's actions regarding Poland created vast tensions and disputes as did the spheres of influence and Stalin's actions discussed at Potsdam: the moving of Poles into the USSR, communists integrated into governments and incorporating some of Poland into the Soviet Union. Yet the allies' hesitation in opening a second front created important disputes as did discussions at Yalta and Potsdam in particular the dropping of the atomic bomb. Therefore blame cannot be placed entirely unto Stalin; the "shotgun marriage" was bound to have disputes especially considering the importance of the issues they faced. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Assess the view that Stalins suspicions of his western allies between 1941 and 1945 ...

    4 star(s)

    He states that preparations for the attacks had to be the most elaborate ever to succeed. If this argument were assumed to be correct then Stalin cannot be justified in his suspicions as the western allies were planning for what resulted to be a major turning point in the war.

  2. Assess the reasons why Stalin was in dispute with his wartime allies from 1941-45

    This would suggest to orthodox historians that Stalin was a heartless dictator only wishing to gain for himself and his country, and not worrying about harming any other countries in the process. His aggression can also be seen in the Soviet Show Trials, during which an estimated 18 million Soviet

  1. Disputes at Yalta and Potsdam were more important than previous war-time disagreements in the ...

    Stalin felt that the fighting was been left for Russia and the theory that the West was leaving Communism to destroy itself soon emerged. Stalin first asked Churchill for a Second Front in 1941, 3 years later he was still waiting with growing suspicions; Revisionist historians would sympathise with his wait empathising the abandonment by Churchill and Roosevelt.

  2. Assess the relative importance of the reasons why the July 1944 Bomb Plot to ...

    On the morning of 20th July, 1944, von Stauffenberg set the timer of the bomb in his brief-case and situated it beneath the table in the conference room, close to Hitler. Shortly after he made an excuse to depart the room on the pretext of answering a telephone call.

  1. How successfully did Great Britain secure its interests in the Eastern Question from 1854-1878? ...

    This ultimately preserved Britain's naval control in the Mediterranean and their trade routes to India. Therefore, this portrays that Britain did successfully achieve its interests in the Eastern Question from 1854-1878. Moreover, Britain also successfully achieved its interest of containing Russia during the Crimean War as they prevented Russia from expanding westwards into Central Europe and the Turkish Empire.

  2. How EffectIVE Was Soviet Political Control In Eastern Europe In The 1950's & 1960's?

    Through their method of luring political parties to form coalitions with them and then seemingly, "backstabbing them", they were able to gain control quite effectively. They started a domino effect of sorts, by taking over one particular political party, it allowed them to gain power and do as they wish

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work