• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss the course and consequences of the Arab Israeli Conflict

Extracts from this document...


History Essay (2,664 words) By the end of the 19th century, Zionism (the international movement aimed at the reestablishment of a Jewish homeland) was beginning to form into an organized body with Theodore Herzl providing an essential driving force. Theodore Herzl (a renowned Zionist leader) had acquired the goal of a Jewish State as the solution to a dilemma which had plagued his people - the Jewish victims of European Diaspora (in context: "the spreading of Jews"). The Jews had been displaced across Europe and had failed to find solace in countries which did not respect their culture, but mainly and especially later, their ethnicity. Palestine (a religiously promised homeland) had become a logical choice to the Zionists. However, with this choice, came a significant issue; in the late 19th century approximately 15,000 Jews were living in Palestine and some 400,000 Arabs. The fundamental question of "What to do with Arab population?" had to be answered. Due to the manner in which the Zionists achieved their goal, a desperate struggle for identity for both Arabs and Jews would occur in the next five decades, and with it, a 'particular Palestinian Arab Nationalism' would develop. However, only through the Zionist approach - a Jewish incursion into the Arab land and from there, settlement - would this Nationalism be given birth. The so called 'native savages' of Palestine would not sit idly by whilst the Zionists brought an "outpost of civilization...opposed to barbarism" (Herzl). Following 1897 and through the first half of the 20th century, there would be numerous conflicts, political movements and under a Mandate system, thousands ...read more.


For all of this effort, the British did not see a strategic advantage in handing Palestine to the Jews, as they could just the same give it to the Arabs. Thus, the British would not agree to assist the Jews for another two years. From July 14th 1915, to January 30 1916, the Hussein-McMahon correspondence between the Sharif of Mecca, Husayn bin Ali and Sir Henry McMahon occurred. This correspondence sought to have the British support the Arabs in the area of the Ottoman Empire in keeping their independence should they assist in destabilizing Turkey during WWI. The letter on 24th October 1915 is a substantially important contributor to later 'anti-British' sentiment of Arabs. The letter outlined that, "...Great Britain is prepared to recognize and uphold the independence of the Arabs in all the regions lying within the frontiers proposed by the Sharif of Mecca." This would later be undermined by the 'secret' Sykes-Picot agreement which would contradict the promise. The Sykes-Picot agreement would involve Britain, France and Russia, and the partition of the Ottoman Empire would be agreed upon. For the Palestinian case, Britain was allocated control of areas roughly comprising today's Jordan, southern Iraq, and a small area around Haifa. This abrogation of the Hussein-McMahon agreement would see the British gain substantial opposition from the Arabs. The 12th of November, 1917, ushered in the Balfour Declaration, the result of consistent lobbying by Chaim Weizmann (future first president of Israel). Britain expressed in the Balfour Declaration, "views in favour of the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people...best endeavours to facilitate the ...read more.


Reflecting on the incidents in December, 1933, Khalil al-Sakakini stated that, "Whoever investigates the rebellions in Palestine during the English period will see them as an ongoing development". This statement could not be further from the truth. It would, of course, be quite narrow-minded to say that the protests 'involved everyone' from the beginning. It started with, as Palestinian Khalil al-Sakakini perceived, "locals in Jerusalem, the second broader and limited to a few cities and eventually encompassed all cities". The conflict - demonstrations and violence (terrorism included) - had eventually involved all Palestinian Nationalist Arabs who were in fear of becoming a majority ruled by a minority (where Palestine would be a Jewish-ruled State). The incidents in 1933 can then be seen as "a single-chain of events" (Khalil al-Sakakini, 1933), which he believed also developed a message - placing emphasis on the goal of the demonstrations; "The entire world will see that the Arab nation is not easy prey". The demonstrations themselves, of course, can be seen as a direct response to the British Mandate and policies at the time - the Zionists having the British perceptually on their side (or at least, in the Arab's eyes). That being said, past 'betrayals' and disapproval of the Mandate system had left an accumulation of ill-felt loyalty to the British control which had then been fueled by further Jewish 'oppression' and incursion upon the Arab land. This had culminated to a single, focal point of unrest; a very unrest that the Arab nationalist movement would soon evoke upon their 'oppressors' in the years to come. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Historical Periods section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Historical Periods essays

  1. Revision Table - Tudor Rebellions

    In comparison to a threat such as open opposition to the government, the significance of the threat is negligible. It is therefore reasonable to state that the Pilgrimage of Grace did not pose a serious threat to Tudor Government. Success * Raised large force * Govt had to negotiate - considered it a threat.

  2. Assess the contributions of Militiades and Leonidas to the course of the Persian Wars

    While Hignett, a modern historian, believes Xerxes always knew of the path, most other historians dismiss his view. Leonidas sent away nearly all of his troops, except the Spartans, Thebans and Thespians. They fought bravely to their death, including Leonidas.

  1. The Third English Civil War

    Leslie drew back at once, but managed to find a fresh strong position in front of Stirling, whence he defied Cromwell again. At this juncture Cromwell prepared to pass his whole army across the Firth. His contemplated manoeuvre of course gave up to the enemy all the roads into England,

  2. Why Were Some Forms Of Nationalism More Successful Than Others In Achieving Concessions From ...

    nations of the earth", became a symbol and an inspiring memory, very dear to future revolutionary nationalists. In the years succeeding the fruitless uprising of Emmet, there was a political vacuum in Irish politics. However, this was gap soon filled by the pragmatic and enigmatic constitutionalist, named Daniel O'Connell.

  1. Who was more important in bringing about the end of Apartheid and minority rule ...

    In this sense he was indispensable to the negotiations and the settlements. Mandela stuck to his principal of one man one vote during the tough and long CODESA negotiations with the government. Mandela had to walk out on more than one occasion to get his way.

  2. How Important Were The Policies Of Gorbachev In Bringing An End To The Cold ...

    The USSR did nothing to prevent these events; Gorbachev seemed to approve of the Poles deciding their own future. Also, after the dealings of control in Czechoslovakia, the Velvet Revolution was put into place. The Communist regime was brought down by widespread demonstrations and protests, mostly involving little violence.

  1. The First English Civil War

    the war-like purpose of the still vacillating court at Nottingham, and in the country at large, to convert many thousands of waverers to active Royalism. Ere long, Charles who had hitherto had fewer than 1,500 men, was at the head of an army which, though very deficient in arms and

  2. In the context of India in the 1840s to 1947, how far can independence ...

    Gandhi only returned from South Africa in 1915 as something of a hero, his work there had been widely publicised in India, but there was already a growing desire for a representative of the people. Gandhi felt pressured into recruiting Indians to fight to help his desire for Indian independence,

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work