• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss the view that during the 1920s the British always put their imperial interests before their commitment to the peace and stability of Europe.

Extracts from this document...


Alexander Zafiriou Discuss the view that during the 1920s the British always put their imperial interests before their commitment to the peace and stability of Europe. Britain, to an extent, was more concerned with her empire than with European affairs during the 1920s. She only deployed the army when her empire was involved, for example in Ireland, India or Australia. On the other hand, by 1929 there was no immediate threat of war, and as Winston Churchill said, "The state of Europe was tranquil", partly because of the many treaties that were signed during the 1920s that Britain orchestrated. But the main revisionist argument against Britain during this period was that they did not do enough to ensure the peace and stability of Europe as the second world war did break out less than ten years later, but this was not only due to increased concern in the empire. Britain also had domestic concerns; public opinion played a major role in the actions employed by the government and that the government were looking to minimise needless costs due to the fragile economic situation in the country after world war one and therefore did not want to send an army into a situation that did not concern her. ...read more.


Major politicians, although not inherently sorry for Germany after this outcome, voiced their concerns over the new arrangements, which could cause a German backlash in the future. Harold Nicholson, a British diplomat in 1919, said, "The treaties imposed on our enemies were neither just nor wise," and even John Maynard Keynes, who was present at the signing of the treaty, said that it was "one of the most serious acts of unwisdom for which our statesmen have been responsible." This created a problem for the government because it meant that they would have to go against the wishes of the public and many important officials who were against the treaty, if they were to involve themselves in European affairs that dealt mainly with the fate of Germany after the war. This is why isolationism seemed the right way to go for the government. As Britain's empire increased after the First World War, so did their troubles. Many of Britain's colonies demanded independence and this meant that Britain had to focus on their own problems before they could deal with those of the League of Nations. India, for example, were unhappy with the slow implementation of an independently run government and so, when riots broke out in Amritsar in 1919, the Government had to react and sent an army to quell this rebellion. ...read more.


This culminated in the Rapallo treaty, which Russia and Germany signed, but this did not work out, as Germany could not pay due to her economical difficulties at the time. Britain's actions here certainly did help keep the peace and stability in Europe intact and after all this and the Kellogg-Briand pact in1928 that guaranteed peace between sixty-two countries, there was no threat of war. Britain's involvement in international affairs in the 1920s, although limited to diplomacy because of economic and political considerations at home, was not altogether overridden by her commitment to her empire. The government made an effort to stabilise central Europe and to make sure that no military conflict would break out. This was secured but was evidently not enough as another world war did break out only ten years later and thus meant that Britain and the other allies had not done enough to secure this peace. Britain's commitments were centred on her empire, as this was a period in which many anti-British uprisings occurred which required the utmost care on Britain's part to dispel. She had to devote her attention to the matters, which concerned her most, and this involved the empire, but Britain certainly did her part to keep international tension to a low. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Why did tension increase in Europe between 1900 and 1914?

    * The Germans assumed that the more dangerous opponent would be Russia, so the Plan was intended to knock out France before the Russian army mobilised. * The Plan was based on the belief that the Russian army would take six weeks to mobilise.

  2. How Successful Was the League in The 1920's and 1930's? The League of ...

    Their policy upon preventing war had failed, and had ultimately led to one. Following on from that, Britain and France did not agree on many things as they had always been enemies. When the Council needed to decide upon something, they voted via veto.

  1. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    unacceptable shift in the balance of forces that could not be endured indefinitely. Therefore, Israel had reasons of its own for a future attack on the Syrians in Lebanon. The Two-Week War As the tension in the Bekaa Valley subsided, IDF chief of staff Rafael Eitan urged Begin to mount an artillery bombardment of Palestinian bases in Lebanon.

  2. How far do you agree that support for the League of Nations was the ...

    Liberalism fostered the notion political compromise was reached by discussion and assured peace. The League inspired people to believe the nations could co-operate peacefully and resolve differences through negotiation not violence. Throughout the 1920's, disarmament conferences were held to try and reduce arms and size of armies so that violent war could be avoided.


    Give three reasons. In SOURCE C an historian describes Hitler's plans for Germany. SOURCE C Hitler wanted all Germans to live in Germany. He wanted more land for the German people and he could only do this by taking land from other countries.

  2. How Strong was Opposition to Continental Commitments in the 1920's

    was clear that the only way to cope in the face of the economic reality was to cut military expenditure. Less than one tenth of the army remained by 1920, which was largely responsible by the eradication of conscription. Seventy five percent of the mere 300,000 remaining army was devoted to the empire.

  1. Many peoples have contributed to the development of the United States of America, a ...

    On Apr. 12, 1861, when President Lincoln moved to reprovision the federal troops at FORT SUMTER, in Charleston Harbor, Confederate shore batteries launched a 34-hour battering of the installation, forcing its surrender. The U.S. CIVIL WAR had begun. The War between the States Lincoln moved swiftly.

  2. Is There Still an Imperial Presidency?

    not make any foreign policy appear bigger/ more dangerous as it originally is. Professor Schlesinger stated that "the fall of the soviet union completed the revolt against the abuse of presidential power. Because it was the creation of international crisis, the imperial presidency collapsed once that crisis came to an end."

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work