• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do Historians agree that the WSPU was an elitist, anti-male organisation?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Do Historians agree that the WSPU was an elitist, anti-male organisation? Many historians have argued for and against the factor that the WSPU was an elitist (anti-male) organisation. The term elitist organisation highlights a group governed by highly intellectual individuals, or people belonging to the upper classes of society (like the aristocracy). The political organisation highlighted here (WSPU) which stands for the 'Women's Social and Political Union' had started off targeting working class members, later moving their attention to the middle class. Women were also only allowed to join the WSPU, men being restricted to joining this particular organisation. ...read more.

Middle

This in turn would lead the WSPU in becoming an elitist organisation. The organisation soon after would only gain upper class women members. This shows that the organisation would have been elitist because the women they would have wanted in the organisation were upper class and they would have been treated better than the working class women. The fact that they only recruited upper class women could be contradicted because they started off in a poor area, so the women recruited would have been working class as opposed to upper class. ...read more.

Conclusion

Another point to take into account regarding if the WSPU organisation was elitist is the fact that social equality was a primary concept 'not taken into action', rather a political focus. This shows that the WSPU only cared about their aims, rather than everyone else's. The working class would have wanted the same level of equality as the middle class however the WSPU only wanted the right to vote and didn't really care about the social inequality between the classes and the unfairness of the class systems. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Free essay

    Did the WSPU help or hinder the struggle for women's rights?

    This approach, however, did not seem to get them any closer in achieving votes for women. Because of the lack of reaction the Suffragettes upped their campaign. The Chancellor of Exchequer at the time, HH Asquith was a leading opponent of Suffrage was heckled by Suffragettes in the House of Commons.

  2. How do the poets in 'Charlotte O'Neils song' and 'Nothing Changed' show their feelings ...

    We can see that the rich have a life of luxury and ease while the servants, who are poor, have to do all the hard work. Furthermore, the rich defend their privilege by saying that it's the natural way for the world to operate.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work