• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do imperial strengths outweigh weaknesses in Germany by 1890?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Bismarck was to be the chief architect of the German Empire. To credit Otto von Bismarck with uniting Germany throughout the period of 1862 to 1890 seems absurd, given his "contempt for nationalism and liberalism". Bismarck's main aim initially was Prussian domination of north Germany rather than full national unity. He said in 1958 that there was 'nothing more Germany than the development of Prussia's particular interests'. The imperial strengths in Germany by 1890, was due to the realistic and often ruthless policies (Realpolitik) of politicians, like Bismarck, whose only aim was to increase the power of a state. 'I am not so arrogant as to assume that the likes of us are able to make history. My task is to keep an eye on the currents of the latter and steer my ship in them as best I can.' Over the years this statement from Bismarck proved to be corrected he 'steered' brilliantly. However there are a number of factors which caused Germany to be a supreme world leader, the Prussian army, Prussian economic success, Economic unity and the Zollverein, German nationalism and the international situation. It is not fair to state that Bismarck failed domestically, however it is true to some extent that his foreign policies, in terms of success and to some extent importance, did overshadow his practically and theoretically limited domestic policies. It could be argued that these limitations were not because of Bismarck's political mismanagement but because of the social and political situation Germany held at the time. ...read more.

Middle

Relations began to ripen, following the death of Pope Pius IX, 1878, Bismarck was able to negotiate with his successor, Leo XIII. Falk was dismissed and exiled clergy were allowed to return to their positions. However, it was not all victorious for the Catholics. Many of the May Laws remained in force, Jesuits were forbidden to remain in Germany and the State continued to oversee all permanent Church appointments. Once again, Bismarck uses his experience in turning failure into an alternative success, harnessing Catholic political power in the Reichstag to deal with a potentially bigger threat, Socialism. Economic growth in the 1850s and 1860s outstripped that of Austria and France, by the mid 1860's more coal and steel were produced than of France or Austria, it also had a more extensive railway network. In 1865 she possesses 15,000 steam engines with a total horsepower of 800,000. Austria, by contrast had 3,400 steam engines with a total horsepower of 100,000. Bismarck was able to capitalise on the mistakes of his opponents in order to strengthen Germany an example of this is when Bismarck was able to do this was in 1864 with the Schleswig-Holstein situation. The combined forces of Austria and Prussia entered Schleswig-Holstein to face the Danish forces. Prussian nationalists, who favoured the grossdeutsch idea, were in favour of this action as the Germany speaking people in Schleswig-Holstein were to be freed from Danish control and put under Prussian control. However the situation that occurred was that Schleswig and Holstein were split between Prussia and Austria. ...read more.

Conclusion

Bismarck saw the opportunity for again limiting Frances allies and decided to welcome Italy in an alliance, showing neutrality to Russia and Austria. Bismarck was able to restrain Italy in Africa and signed further agreements with Bulgaria. In 1884, Bismarckhad managed to be on good terms with France, marking the zenith of his system. A crisis in Bulgaria had shattered the Three Emperor's Alliance. The issue over the Balkans had become another threat, however Bismarck refused to take sides in the dispute. As Russo-Austrian relations grew weaker, Bismarck's fear of France grew stronger, he could sense a Franco-Russian alliance coming to play, where Nationalistic feeling was created. Furthermore, pro-French ministers in Russia seemed to be exerting great influence over the Tsar. In February1887 the Triple Alliance was renewed, Bismarck had persuaded Austria to promise to consult Italy on all matters affecting the Balkans, the Adriatic and the Aegean. Events finally turned in Bismarck's favour. France avoided Russian feelers and conservative diplomats won the upper hand in St. Petersburg. Tsar Alexander III accepted that an alliance with Germany was better than nothing and signed the Reinsurance Treaty in June 1887. The agreement was that if a third power went to war on Germany, Russia would remain neutral, and vice versa. This treaty did not contravene with the Dual Alliance and was seen to be a masterpiece of Bismarck's diplomatic juggling. Finally, Bismarck secured peace in the Balkans and between the European powers by publishing the Dual Alliance in February 1888. This threatened Russia Germany would side Austria if war was to come about. This along with rumours of the Mediterranean Agreement persuaded Russia to leave the Balkans alone. Fahim Talukder L6SD ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. To what extent was Bismarck responsible for German unification?

    Bismarck helped his long term plan to unite Germany and to be the ruler by getting in a strong position with the king. The king owned Bismarck a 'favour� as Bismarck had solved the king�s constitutional crisis. Bismarck played a crucial part in the unification of Germany as he helped

  2. How significant was Bismarck in securing the unification of Germany 1862-71?Bismarck's significance in securing ...

    won the gratitude of Alexander II, and so because of this Russia could be relied upon to remain neutral in a future war with Austria. "Bismarck was also hedging his bets in international diplomacy", S.Lee's view that Bismarck was gambling agrees with mine, that Bismarck at times relied on luck when manipulating instances where he didn't have full control.

  1. Reasons for Napoleon's Success (to 1807).

    * Tsar Alexander now saw himself as the saviour of Europe. He believed he had a Christian mission to complete the defeat of Napoleon and to free Europe from tyranny. * Under his leadership, the Fourth Coalition, initially composed of Russia, Prussia and Britain, was formed in 1813.

  2. Why was Prussia able to win the war with Austria in 1866?

    He tried to appease Russia over the Polish Revolt by offering Prussian support and allowing Russian troops to cross the border and catch rebels. This is done to either guarantee Russia's neutrality or a possible alliance against Austria (an alliance could cause Austrian to fight a war from north and east).

  1. "Kaiser Wilhelm II used to the full his authority as Kaiser of the German ...

    Maybe, through Wilhelm's decision to back the army, he had managed to somewhat achieve personal rule and to regain some control, despite criticism form the Reichstag, after the Daily Telegraph Affair. One of Wilhelm's only ways to achieve a somewhat authoritarian rule was to try and form a coalition of support within the Reichstag.

  2. Why did Prussia rather than Austria lead the unification of Germany?

    had no clear means to see how, how far, or at what pace Prussia might defeat Austria and unify the states. Not all historians have accepted the traditional account of the unification with almost sole responsibility attributed to Bismarck. J.M.

  1. Why was the league so ineffective in dealing with the Abyssinian Crisis?

    Abyssinia would be split up with Italy getting the fertile lands and a large area to the south would be reserved for Italian economic advancement. Neither Italy nor Abyssinia was involved in these "talks". These "talks" were then leaked to the press.

  2. Bismarck's effect on Germany and Europe

    France was the only other nation that illustrates universal suffrage and in the France of Napoleon III, neither conservatives nor liberals could take much satisfaction.4 Later that year Britain also adopted the voting rights, but still less than half the population of adult males were entitled to vote.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work