• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do imperial strengths outweigh weaknesses in Germany by 1890?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Bismarck was to be the chief architect of the German Empire. To credit Otto von Bismarck with uniting Germany throughout the period of 1862 to 1890 seems absurd, given his "contempt for nationalism and liberalism". Bismarck's main aim initially was Prussian domination of north Germany rather than full national unity. He said in 1958 that there was 'nothing more Germany than the development of Prussia's particular interests'. The imperial strengths in Germany by 1890, was due to the realistic and often ruthless policies (Realpolitik) of politicians, like Bismarck, whose only aim was to increase the power of a state. 'I am not so arrogant as to assume that the likes of us are able to make history. My task is to keep an eye on the currents of the latter and steer my ship in them as best I can.' Over the years this statement from Bismarck proved to be corrected he 'steered' brilliantly. However there are a number of factors which caused Germany to be a supreme world leader, the Prussian army, Prussian economic success, Economic unity and the Zollverein, German nationalism and the international situation. It is not fair to state that Bismarck failed domestically, however it is true to some extent that his foreign policies, in terms of success and to some extent importance, did overshadow his practically and theoretically limited domestic policies. It could be argued that these limitations were not because of Bismarck's political mismanagement but because of the social and political situation Germany held at the time. ...read more.

Middle

Relations began to ripen, following the death of Pope Pius IX, 1878, Bismarck was able to negotiate with his successor, Leo XIII. Falk was dismissed and exiled clergy were allowed to return to their positions. However, it was not all victorious for the Catholics. Many of the May Laws remained in force, Jesuits were forbidden to remain in Germany and the State continued to oversee all permanent Church appointments. Once again, Bismarck uses his experience in turning failure into an alternative success, harnessing Catholic political power in the Reichstag to deal with a potentially bigger threat, Socialism. Economic growth in the 1850s and 1860s outstripped that of Austria and France, by the mid 1860's more coal and steel were produced than of France or Austria, it also had a more extensive railway network. In 1865 she possesses 15,000 steam engines with a total horsepower of 800,000. Austria, by contrast had 3,400 steam engines with a total horsepower of 100,000. Bismarck was able to capitalise on the mistakes of his opponents in order to strengthen Germany an example of this is when Bismarck was able to do this was in 1864 with the Schleswig-Holstein situation. The combined forces of Austria and Prussia entered Schleswig-Holstein to face the Danish forces. Prussian nationalists, who favoured the grossdeutsch idea, were in favour of this action as the Germany speaking people in Schleswig-Holstein were to be freed from Danish control and put under Prussian control. However the situation that occurred was that Schleswig and Holstein were split between Prussia and Austria. ...read more.

Conclusion

Bismarck saw the opportunity for again limiting Frances allies and decided to welcome Italy in an alliance, showing neutrality to Russia and Austria. Bismarck was able to restrain Italy in Africa and signed further agreements with Bulgaria. In 1884, Bismarckhad managed to be on good terms with France, marking the zenith of his system. A crisis in Bulgaria had shattered the Three Emperor's Alliance. The issue over the Balkans had become another threat, however Bismarck refused to take sides in the dispute. As Russo-Austrian relations grew weaker, Bismarck's fear of France grew stronger, he could sense a Franco-Russian alliance coming to play, where Nationalistic feeling was created. Furthermore, pro-French ministers in Russia seemed to be exerting great influence over the Tsar. In February1887 the Triple Alliance was renewed, Bismarck had persuaded Austria to promise to consult Italy on all matters affecting the Balkans, the Adriatic and the Aegean. Events finally turned in Bismarck's favour. France avoided Russian feelers and conservative diplomats won the upper hand in St. Petersburg. Tsar Alexander III accepted that an alliance with Germany was better than nothing and signed the Reinsurance Treaty in June 1887. The agreement was that if a third power went to war on Germany, Russia would remain neutral, and vice versa. This treaty did not contravene with the Dual Alliance and was seen to be a masterpiece of Bismarck's diplomatic juggling. Finally, Bismarck secured peace in the Balkans and between the European powers by publishing the Dual Alliance in February 1888. This threatened Russia Germany would side Austria if war was to come about. This along with rumours of the Mediterranean Agreement persuaded Russia to leave the Balkans alone. Fahim Talukder L6SD ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Reasons for Napoleon's Success (to 1807).

    * It was the first occasion on which all the other great powers, Britain, Russia, Prussia and Austria, were at war with Napoleon at the same time; but there was still no single alliance binding them together. * The end of the armistice led to renewed fighting, and in October

  2. To what extent was Bismarck responsible for German unification?

    Bismarck helped his long term plan to unite Germany and to be the ruler by getting in a strong position with the king. The king owned Bismarck a 'favour� as Bismarck had solved the king�s constitutional crisis. Bismarck played a crucial part in the unification of Germany as he helped

  1. TO WHAT EXTENT WAS BISMARCK IN CONTROL OF GERMAN DOMESTIC POLICY FROM 1871-90?

    However his aggressive attack had, in fact, strengthened rather than weakened his 'enemies of the state'. German Catholics gained a sense of collective identity and greater unity, and the Centre Party became stronger when their leader, Windthorst encouraged other Catholics to express their opposition in elections.

  2. "To What Extent Can Bismarck Claim The Credit For German Unification".

    This allowed the Prussian Government to rule without parliament, and collect the taxes to use at their desire. In this crisis Bismarck had acted both ruthlessly and illegally. As they were now collecting the taxes, the army reforms were carried out, in spite of protests.

  1. "Kaiser Wilhelm II used to the full his authority as Kaiser of the German ...

    This therefore, as well as being of personal interest to the Kaiser, increased his support block within the Reichstag. Furthermore, in 1912, Holwegg introduced new Army and Navy Bills, as a part of a policy of, later named, Imperial

  2. Otto von Bismarck and his Policies.

    Having a solid ally, Bismarck demonstrated his virtuosity by negotiating a revived Dreikaiserbund in 1881. He now had influence in St. Petersburg as well as in Vienna to prevent a Balkan war. In 1882, Italy, fearing French hostility, joined the Dual Alliance, making it into the Triple Alliance.

  1. "In the period 1871-1890 Bismarck was better at crushing his opponents than at producing ...

    A national legal system meant that each state had to follow the same laws, so if each state was following the same rules they would once again come closer to unification and finally free trade. This meant that states could import and export goods with no taxes making relations between

  2. To what extent was Bismarck in control of the direction Germany's Foreign Policy took ...

    It could be argued that Bismarck was fully in control of this situation and that the isolation of France was due to Bismarck's careful planning. It may be suggested that Bismarck premeditated that France would eventually seek revenge for their defeat in the Franco-Prussian War.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work