• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do Kehr's essays imply a coherent theory about the origins of the First World War?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

18th February 2003 Do Kehr's essays imply a coherent theory about the origins of the First World War? Eckart Kehr is often described as the father of revisionist thought concerning imperial Germany and the road to war. His seminal collection of essays, Der Primat der Innenpolitik, was dismissed at the time and for a number of decades subsequent to its publication, for the primacy of foreign policy continued to dominate historical thinking. Kehr argued that Germany, for a number of domestic reasons, was pursuing a Weltpolitik that eventually led to the First World War. She rearmed and reorganised because of internal political tensions and squabblings, not because of any real provocation or threat from abroad. This theme has been taken up by other revisionist historians, most notably Fritz Fischer in 1961, but it is a rather one-sided view. It is impossible to view Germany's actions purely in isolation, and Kehr fails to take into account the activities and manoeuvrings of Germany's neighbours and rivals. She was not necessarily following a unique course, nor was she always the first to adopt certain measures. More recent historians, such as David Blackbourn and V.R. Berghahn, whilst not necessarily returning to the views of the orthodox school so violently rejected by Kehr, argue nevertheless that his theory presents only one side of the debate. ...read more.

Middle

Political wranglings and tensions meant that before long, they were soon demanding a similar expansion. The military's abandonment of the policy of steady troop increases was also due to the shrewd realisation that the extent of the navy's enlargement was such that it would inexorably lead Germany into conflict in the near future. Again, according to Kehr, it was Germany's sudden rearmament which prompted her neighbours to follow suit, in order to defend themselves from possible attack. Kehr also claims it was internal pressures which led to an increase in tensions in Germany's foreign relations. She had, towards the end of the nineteenth century, begun to import vast amounts of Russian grain and rye, which was vital to fund the Tsarist Empire's push for progress and modernisation. However, once the East Elbian landowners had introduced tariffs to protect their own agricultural interests, the effects on the Russian economy were dramatic. Thus domestic policies influenced Germany's foreign affairs, for this new policy led to a severe deterioration in Russo-German relations, and meant that, because the adage "countries who trade with one another do not fight each other" no longer applied, it was more likely that, in any future conflict, the two would be on opposite sides. ...read more.

Conclusion

Kehr's essays do present a coherent theory as to the origins of the First World War. It is possible to see how Germany's domestic actions could have led her towards war, and to go even further, as Fischer does in his Germany's Grasp for World Power in 1961, that 1914 was the outbreak of a world war that she had been actively working towards since 1912. Kehr does not go quite so far, but he refuted the previously held belief that Germany was innocent in the build up to war (indeed, his claims have a curious resonance in Friedrich Meinecke's Die deustche Katastrope, when he holds Prussian-German militarism for the event of World War One - curious because Meinecke was one of the historians Kehr had in mind when countering the orthodox point of view). However, Kehr's theory, no matter how coherent, is not necessarily correct. This debate has raged for decades, and will, no doubt, continue for many more, but the behaviour of other European powers, and their impact on Germany and the outbreak of war should also be taken into consideration. Placing the blame on Germany alone is to be as one-sided as those who Kehr was contradicting in his essays. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Assessing the impact of the first world war on international relations in the decade ...

    For example, in Russia, they could no longer contain the pressures of war weariness, social conflict and national separitism. These were the reasons, which made Lenin to organize the Bolsheviks who overthrew the provisional government in what is commonly known as "the October revolution" of 1917.12 In the years that

  2. Why did tension increase in Europe between 1900 and 1914?

    * Chamberlain returned to London believing that war was inevitable. Evacuation began in London and 1,000,000 volunteers were called for by the government. * But at the last moment war was avoided, the Italian dictator Mussolini suggested a four power conference.

  1. Must a defensible theory of the morality of war must integrate moral reasoning with ...

    they must draft a formal declaration, it must be the last resort, proportionality and there must be a probability for success. All of these criteria must be fulfilled for a war to be deemed just. The second principle of just war theory is jus in bello, or the guidelines to morally correct conduct of war.

  2. Who is to be blamed for the outbreak of the First World War?

    crumbling empire; it should know well that this would probably mean European war. Although Austrians could have hoped for Russian neutrality, they ought to have realized how humiliating would it be for her to stand aside and to look how her Slavic brothers of orthodox faith are suffering oppression.

  1. "Keep the dogs hungry, they will follow you". Such was in essence, the ruling ...

    At 16, Qabus was sent to England, where he studied with a private tutor, then went to Sandhurst. He was stationed for a time in Germany after becoming an officer. The only other major event in his life was a round-the-world trip on which he was chaperoned by a British major.

  2. How useful is the 'Fischer Thesis' in helping to explain the origins of the ...

    Germany had the means to do this due to them being behind these countries and as Fischer states that they would try and get this power with or without applying necessary force in the form of War. Germany began the war against France and Great Britain and from this you

  1. American economic foreign policy and the origins of the cold war

    role as a financial center)."5 American political leaders perceived the gold standard, as managed by the Bank of England, as responsible for having stabilized currency exchanges and prices, and for having ensured a steady growth in production and trade among Western industrial countries during that period.

  2. Khrushchev's attempts at modernisation.

    Indeed the total amount of new land given over to cultivation was equal to all the cultivated land in Britain, France and Spain combined! The collective farms were also amalgamated into gigantic farm cities so that peasants could enjoy some of the amenities of urban life.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work