• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do Kehr's essays imply a coherent theory about the origins of the First World War?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

18th February 2003 Do Kehr's essays imply a coherent theory about the origins of the First World War? Eckart Kehr is often described as the father of revisionist thought concerning imperial Germany and the road to war. His seminal collection of essays, Der Primat der Innenpolitik, was dismissed at the time and for a number of decades subsequent to its publication, for the primacy of foreign policy continued to dominate historical thinking. Kehr argued that Germany, for a number of domestic reasons, was pursuing a Weltpolitik that eventually led to the First World War. She rearmed and reorganised because of internal political tensions and squabblings, not because of any real provocation or threat from abroad. This theme has been taken up by other revisionist historians, most notably Fritz Fischer in 1961, but it is a rather one-sided view. It is impossible to view Germany's actions purely in isolation, and Kehr fails to take into account the activities and manoeuvrings of Germany's neighbours and rivals. She was not necessarily following a unique course, nor was she always the first to adopt certain measures. More recent historians, such as David Blackbourn and V.R. Berghahn, whilst not necessarily returning to the views of the orthodox school so violently rejected by Kehr, argue nevertheless that his theory presents only one side of the debate. ...read more.

Middle

Political wranglings and tensions meant that before long, they were soon demanding a similar expansion. The military's abandonment of the policy of steady troop increases was also due to the shrewd realisation that the extent of the navy's enlargement was such that it would inexorably lead Germany into conflict in the near future. Again, according to Kehr, it was Germany's sudden rearmament which prompted her neighbours to follow suit, in order to defend themselves from possible attack. Kehr also claims it was internal pressures which led to an increase in tensions in Germany's foreign relations. She had, towards the end of the nineteenth century, begun to import vast amounts of Russian grain and rye, which was vital to fund the Tsarist Empire's push for progress and modernisation. However, once the East Elbian landowners had introduced tariffs to protect their own agricultural interests, the effects on the Russian economy were dramatic. Thus domestic policies influenced Germany's foreign affairs, for this new policy led to a severe deterioration in Russo-German relations, and meant that, because the adage "countries who trade with one another do not fight each other" no longer applied, it was more likely that, in any future conflict, the two would be on opposite sides. ...read more.

Conclusion

Kehr's essays do present a coherent theory as to the origins of the First World War. It is possible to see how Germany's domestic actions could have led her towards war, and to go even further, as Fischer does in his Germany's Grasp for World Power in 1961, that 1914 was the outbreak of a world war that she had been actively working towards since 1912. Kehr does not go quite so far, but he refuted the previously held belief that Germany was innocent in the build up to war (indeed, his claims have a curious resonance in Friedrich Meinecke's Die deustche Katastrope, when he holds Prussian-German militarism for the event of World War One - curious because Meinecke was one of the historians Kehr had in mind when countering the orthodox point of view). However, Kehr's theory, no matter how coherent, is not necessarily correct. This debate has raged for decades, and will, no doubt, continue for many more, but the behaviour of other European powers, and their impact on Germany and the outbreak of war should also be taken into consideration. Placing the blame on Germany alone is to be as one-sided as those who Kehr was contradicting in his essays. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Assessing the impact of the first world war on international relations in the decade ...

    For example, in Russia, they could no longer contain the pressures of war weariness, social conflict and national separitism. These were the reasons, which made Lenin to organize the Bolsheviks who overthrew the provisional government in what is commonly known as "the October revolution" of 1917.12 In the years that

  2. Assess the impact of the First World War on British society.

    The war did have an impact on women during the war but many of those impacts were more short-term and ended after the war, however areas such as female employment could now be discussed seriously because women demonstrated that they could work just as well as men.

  1. Why did tension increase in Europe between 1900 and 1914?

    Hitler claimed that he had only been interested in uniting Germans. He stated that his expansion was at an end. This was Appeasement. * Peace had been saved, and Hitler had been appeased. Chamberlain was convinced that if Germany's complaints about the Treaty of Versailles could be satisfied, then Hitler

  2. Who is to be blamed for the outbreak of the First World War?

    of German aggression on her French ally, their attitude in July 1914 is agreed by most of the historians to be rather defensive. Britain in particular identified her strength and future with the colonial empire, which seemed to be threatened deliberately by Germany and her new fleet.

  1. How useful is the 'Fischer Thesis' in helping to explain the origins of the ...

    can say that German Leaders did concede in that the only way to end countries with large amount of power was to take them to war.

  2. Superpower Relations 1945-90

    Brezhnev refused. * When martial law was imposed in Poland in December 1981 to stop the activities of the trade union 'Solidarity'; Reagan stopped high technology exports to the Soviet Union. * In 1982 Strategic Arms Reduction Talks (START) began. But all talks soon became deadlocked.

  1. ‘In origins andoutcome, the Spanish Civil War was a Spanish and not a European ...

    Pg76 Germany Hitler was fearful of communist Spain. Hitler saw any victory of socialist Spain as a creation of a leftist bloc in Europe. The quest for Lebensraum was dependent on a prior defeat of France, and that defeat would be endangered if the Spanish Popular Front were not first eliminated.

  2. The Origins of the First World War - Sources Questions

    To conclude, not one of the sources fully supports the idea of an aggressive German foreign policy. This idea is far too conclusive and premature. Source one is a well founded origin of an aggressive foreign policy. Sources two and three show an interpretation of a clumsy and awkward policy.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work