• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do the Writings of Clausewitz have contemporary relevance?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Do the Writings of Clausewitz have contemporary relevance? Carl Von Clausewitz has long been considered one of the most important writers in the field of military strategy and tactics. Born in 1780 he first saw action in 1793 when he was a Lance Corporal in the Prussian Army.1 He was to serve throughout the Napoleonic wars working for both the Prussians and the Russians. However: "throughout his military career he never held a command and was probably unsuited for such. He was essentially a student of war..."2 However, despite this lack of command, Clausewitz had certainly gained enough experience during the Napoleonic wars to have a fairly comprehensive idea about what war was: "Before he was forty, he had taken part in some of the greatest battles in the history of warfare and had seen the armies of Napoleon storm their way across Europe to Moscow... Alls this had been the result of military operations, but it was clear to Clausewitz as a young man that the explanation for the success or failure of these operations was not to be sought on the battlefield alone".3 As a result of this, during his career he came up with many ideas of views on the nature and conduct of war, writing literally thousands of pages of manuscripts on a wide range of areas ranging from politics to tactics.4 After the wars end, he set about trying to write a comprehensive eight part 'guide' on his ideas. This collection of essays and manuscripts became known as "Vom Kriege" (On War). Clausewitz died in 1831 having only completed six of the eight parts.5 Indeed it is important to realise that despite the importance of his work, it is still unfinished and does not cover a number of areas: "On War contains a comprehensive analysis of the strategy operations and tactics of Napoleonic War, and of their 18th Century background. ...read more.

Middle

violence: "How are we to counter the highly sophisticated theory that supposes it is possible for a particularly ingenious method of inflicting minor direct damage on the enemy's forces to lead to major indirect destruction; or that claims to produce by means of limited but skilfully applied blows, such paralysis of the enemy's forces and control of his willpower as to constitute a significant shortcut to victory"23 This argument clearly shows that not all of Clausewitz has aged well - obviously during the Napoleonic era the idea of information warfare did not exist - so it would have been next to impossible to win a war using non violent means - however as has been shown in this age it is at least technically possible to achieve such a victory. It suggests that some parts of Clausewitz's work should perhaps be seen as less relevant to certain situations than others. One area which appears to still be relevant is Clausewitz's comments on the application of force. In the West today public opinion seems to favour engagements with minimal casualties - the public seem to want intervention when scenes of suffering are on TV (the so called CNN effect), but at the same time seem unwilling to tolerate the idea of people dying to stop the suffering24. This is a situation where Clausewitz noted that: "If one side uses force without compunction, undeterred by the bloodshed it involves while the other side refrain, the first will gain the upper hand".25 This idea seems to have been taken onboard by a number of third world leaders who have engaged in some form of conflict with Western Countries (primarily the USA). A good example of this is the conflicts in Somalia - when the USA sent in troops to help restore order to the country they were hampered by restrictive rules of engagement and limited amounts of equipment - for example tanks as these were felt inappropriate.26On the other hand, the opposition led by self styled Warlord ...read more.

Conclusion

18 Even then Clausewitz did not attempt to write on maritime operations - concentrating solely on land warfare. 19 The Next World War,p14, James Adams, 1998 Hutchinson. 20 A good example of this prediction was seen with the terrorist attack on the 11th of September. 21 Quote taken from www.gov.au/lwsc/publications/CA%eEssays/RMA 22 Flashpoint World War Three, p153-154, Andrew Murray, 1997, Pluto Press 23 On War, p228, Carl Von Clausewitz, (edited by Michael Howard & Peter Paret), 1984, Princeton University Press 24 Given the current situation in the USA it will be interesting to see whether the so called 'body bag' syndrome has ended or whether once US troops are killed, public opinion will change to demand a more peaceful solution. 25 On War, p75-76, Carl Von Clausewitz, (edited by Michael Howard & Peter Paret), 1984, Princeton University Press 26 Information taken from Deliver us From Evil, (Chapter 4), William Shawcross,2000, Bloomsbury. 27 Total American losses in Somalia were 30 dead, 175 wounded, the UN lost 72 killed and 87 wounded (Source World Conflicts, Patrick Brogan, 1998, Bloomsbury) 28 Deliver us from evil, p103, William Shawcross, 2000 Bloomsbury. 29 On War, p596, Carl Von Clausewitz, (edited by Michael Howard & Peter Paret), 1984, Princeton University Press 30 Clausewitz, Michael Howard, p39, 1983, Oxford University Press. (Professor Howard incorporates a quote from On War, p596, Carl Von Clausewitz, (edited by Michael Howard & Peter Paret), 1984, Princeton University Press) 31 One Hundred Days, p100, Admiral Sandy Woodward, 1992, Harper Collins 32 However - given the overwhelming amount of Western military power in the region and the political willpower to fight the war, it seems likely that Iraq would still have lost the war - whether Israel was a centre of gravity in the sense that it could remove the coalition from the war seems dubious. 33 Quote taken from www.Clausewitz.com, however text is from an article originally published in Joint Forces Quarterly, Winter 1995-1996 which is reproduced on the website. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. American History.

    - Then came the Deposit Act of 1836, which allowed the Secretary of the Treasury to choose one bank per state to do what the SBUS used to. The act also provided that any federal surplus over $5 million be given to the states starting in 1837.

  2. US President George Bush labelled Iran and Iraq as part of an "axis of ...

    head of Iraq's nuclear programme has provided direct evidence that does suggest Iraq possesses WMD and is continuing to manufacture such weapons. The only sure way to assess the kind of threat Iraq poses, is to get UN inspectors back into Iraq.

  1. Khrushchev's attempts at modernisation.

    Glasnost basically means openness. This meant that Gorbachev allowed more freedom of expression in the Soviet Union. Newspapers were given more freedom to print what they wanted, while the practise of locking dissidents away in mental hospitals or sending them into internal exile was stopped.

  2. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    On the surface, the LAA rebellion seemed spontaneous and reflected Muslim discontent within the army. In reality, however, the rebellion was orchestrated by Fateh and had well-defined objectives. For Fateh leaders, the Lebanese Army had always constituted a military threat to the PLO, not Lebanese militia forces.

  1. Russia: a Century of Upheaval.

    Unfortunately, the outbreak of war brought all these developments to an abrupt halt. As soon as war was declared the people of Russia united against the Germans, and rallied to their Father, the Tsar. Vast crowds fell on their knees before him, and the sense of loyalty to the Romanov dynasty was overwhelming.

  2. Dtente, meaning and definition.

    Peaceful co-existence: Another element of he d�tente in the seventies was peaceful co-existence. D�tente did not seek to eliminate the ideological warfare between them. It continued to stay in spite of progress, if an, in d�tente. Kissenger has rightly observed: "the US and Soviet -Union are ideological rivals.

  1. While surfing the channels on TV you might hear a lot of news about ...

    This is also connected with politics. Media is power, the USA is the biggest power of the world therefore they have interest to be silent about a few news and to exaggerate others. As a reason our verdicts against all terror happenings can't be right because they are based on media news.

  2. The Woman Warrior

    marker for her anywhere, neither in the earth nor the family hall? No one would give her a family hall name." This clearly shows how Maxine feels about her own family.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work