• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do the Writings of Clausewitz have contemporary relevance?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Do the Writings of Clausewitz have contemporary relevance? Carl Von Clausewitz has long been considered one of the most important writers in the field of military strategy and tactics. Born in 1780 he first saw action in 1793 when he was a Lance Corporal in the Prussian Army.1 He was to serve throughout the Napoleonic wars working for both the Prussians and the Russians. However: "throughout his military career he never held a command and was probably unsuited for such. He was essentially a student of war..."2 However, despite this lack of command, Clausewitz had certainly gained enough experience during the Napoleonic wars to have a fairly comprehensive idea about what war was: "Before he was forty, he had taken part in some of the greatest battles in the history of warfare and had seen the armies of Napoleon storm their way across Europe to Moscow... Alls this had been the result of military operations, but it was clear to Clausewitz as a young man that the explanation for the success or failure of these operations was not to be sought on the battlefield alone".3 As a result of this, during his career he came up with many ideas of views on the nature and conduct of war, writing literally thousands of pages of manuscripts on a wide range of areas ranging from politics to tactics.4 After the wars end, he set about trying to write a comprehensive eight part 'guide' on his ideas. This collection of essays and manuscripts became known as "Vom Kriege" (On War). Clausewitz died in 1831 having only completed six of the eight parts.5 Indeed it is important to realise that despite the importance of his work, it is still unfinished and does not cover a number of areas: "On War contains a comprehensive analysis of the strategy operations and tactics of Napoleonic War, and of their 18th Century background. ...read more.

Middle

violence: "How are we to counter the highly sophisticated theory that supposes it is possible for a particularly ingenious method of inflicting minor direct damage on the enemy's forces to lead to major indirect destruction; or that claims to produce by means of limited but skilfully applied blows, such paralysis of the enemy's forces and control of his willpower as to constitute a significant shortcut to victory"23 This argument clearly shows that not all of Clausewitz has aged well - obviously during the Napoleonic era the idea of information warfare did not exist - so it would have been next to impossible to win a war using non violent means - however as has been shown in this age it is at least technically possible to achieve such a victory. It suggests that some parts of Clausewitz's work should perhaps be seen as less relevant to certain situations than others. One area which appears to still be relevant is Clausewitz's comments on the application of force. In the West today public opinion seems to favour engagements with minimal casualties - the public seem to want intervention when scenes of suffering are on TV (the so called CNN effect), but at the same time seem unwilling to tolerate the idea of people dying to stop the suffering24. This is a situation where Clausewitz noted that: "If one side uses force without compunction, undeterred by the bloodshed it involves while the other side refrain, the first will gain the upper hand".25 This idea seems to have been taken onboard by a number of third world leaders who have engaged in some form of conflict with Western Countries (primarily the USA). A good example of this is the conflicts in Somalia - when the USA sent in troops to help restore order to the country they were hampered by restrictive rules of engagement and limited amounts of equipment - for example tanks as these were felt inappropriate.26On the other hand, the opposition led by self styled Warlord ...read more.

Conclusion

18 Even then Clausewitz did not attempt to write on maritime operations - concentrating solely on land warfare. 19 The Next World War,p14, James Adams, 1998 Hutchinson. 20 A good example of this prediction was seen with the terrorist attack on the 11th of September. 21 Quote taken from www.gov.au/lwsc/publications/CA%eEssays/RMA 22 Flashpoint World War Three, p153-154, Andrew Murray, 1997, Pluto Press 23 On War, p228, Carl Von Clausewitz, (edited by Michael Howard & Peter Paret), 1984, Princeton University Press 24 Given the current situation in the USA it will be interesting to see whether the so called 'body bag' syndrome has ended or whether once US troops are killed, public opinion will change to demand a more peaceful solution. 25 On War, p75-76, Carl Von Clausewitz, (edited by Michael Howard & Peter Paret), 1984, Princeton University Press 26 Information taken from Deliver us From Evil, (Chapter 4), William Shawcross,2000, Bloomsbury. 27 Total American losses in Somalia were 30 dead, 175 wounded, the UN lost 72 killed and 87 wounded (Source World Conflicts, Patrick Brogan, 1998, Bloomsbury) 28 Deliver us from evil, p103, William Shawcross, 2000 Bloomsbury. 29 On War, p596, Carl Von Clausewitz, (edited by Michael Howard & Peter Paret), 1984, Princeton University Press 30 Clausewitz, Michael Howard, p39, 1983, Oxford University Press. (Professor Howard incorporates a quote from On War, p596, Carl Von Clausewitz, (edited by Michael Howard & Peter Paret), 1984, Princeton University Press) 31 One Hundred Days, p100, Admiral Sandy Woodward, 1992, Harper Collins 32 However - given the overwhelming amount of Western military power in the region and the political willpower to fight the war, it seems likely that Iraq would still have lost the war - whether Israel was a centre of gravity in the sense that it could remove the coalition from the war seems dubious. 33 Quote taken from www.Clausewitz.com, however text is from an article originally published in Joint Forces Quarterly, Winter 1995-1996 which is reproduced on the website. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Critical response to 'Adam's Ark'.

    Of course 'The Federation' can become dominant because they think they have the majority of power in that moment in time and that is why they are taking all the suitable women they can find because they probably don't know for sure if there's another military group out there at

  2. Khrushchev's attempts at modernisation.

    Gorbachev hoped that such competition would encourage an increase in efficiency and productivity throughout the economy and so reinvigorate Soviet society. It was a clear reaction against the centralised planning of the Stalin years. As Gorbachev himself put it, Perestroika is the development of democracy, socialist self-government, encouragement of initiative

  1. American History.

    - Then came the Deposit Act of 1836, which allowed the Secretary of the Treasury to choose one bank per state to do what the SBUS used to. The act also provided that any federal surplus over $5 million be given to the states starting in 1837.

  2. Armed forces.

    America and Britain were to be equal in size and number of ships whilst the Japan maintained 60% of these numbers. The effect of the conference was that Britain, for the first time since Drake, admitted that she would only be the equal of another power.

  1. Forrest Gump; the Modern Day Fairytale

    When it comes to Forrest getting into a university, he receives a scholarship simply for being good at football, a degree for playing sport. Yet when first spotted running across a football field he is dismissed and judged, like so many times before.

  2. Dtente, meaning and definition.

    Negative and Positive Elements: D�tente has both negative and positive elements. Negative elements signify substantial reduction of tension between the two power blocs in general and between the two superpowers in particular. A positive element indicates increase in mutual trust and understanding between them and brightening of prospect for world peace.

  1. While surfing the channels on TV you might hear a lot of news about ...

    And that is when their activities turned against the United States. If you recall, in 1993 they tried to blow up the World Trade Center. Got part of the way, but not the whole way and that was only part of it.

  2. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    deploy the army to restore order, issued an ultimatum on 16th September. If the army did not immediately go into action, the Phalange would have to take matters into their own hands. The next day the Phalange launched an offensive into central Beirut in an attempt to restore order.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work