• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do the Writings of Clausewitz have contemporary relevance?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Do the Writings of Clausewitz have contemporary relevance? Carl Von Clausewitz has long been considered one of the most important writers in the field of military strategy and tactics. Born in 1780 he first saw action in 1793 when he was a Lance Corporal in the Prussian Army.1 He was to serve throughout the Napoleonic wars working for both the Prussians and the Russians. However: "throughout his military career he never held a command and was probably unsuited for such. He was essentially a student of war..."2 However, despite this lack of command, Clausewitz had certainly gained enough experience during the Napoleonic wars to have a fairly comprehensive idea about what war was: "Before he was forty, he had taken part in some of the greatest battles in the history of warfare and had seen the armies of Napoleon storm their way across Europe to Moscow... Alls this had been the result of military operations, but it was clear to Clausewitz as a young man that the explanation for the success or failure of these operations was not to be sought on the battlefield alone".3 As a result of this, during his career he came up with many ideas of views on the nature and conduct of war, writing literally thousands of pages of manuscripts on a wide range of areas ranging from politics to tactics.4 After the wars end, he set about trying to write a comprehensive eight part 'guide' on his ideas. This collection of essays and manuscripts became known as "Vom Kriege" (On War). Clausewitz died in 1831 having only completed six of the eight parts.5 Indeed it is important to realise that despite the importance of his work, it is still unfinished and does not cover a number of areas: "On War contains a comprehensive analysis of the strategy operations and tactics of Napoleonic War, and of their 18th Century background. ...read more.

Middle

violence: "How are we to counter the highly sophisticated theory that supposes it is possible for a particularly ingenious method of inflicting minor direct damage on the enemy's forces to lead to major indirect destruction; or that claims to produce by means of limited but skilfully applied blows, such paralysis of the enemy's forces and control of his willpower as to constitute a significant shortcut to victory"23 This argument clearly shows that not all of Clausewitz has aged well - obviously during the Napoleonic era the idea of information warfare did not exist - so it would have been next to impossible to win a war using non violent means - however as has been shown in this age it is at least technically possible to achieve such a victory. It suggests that some parts of Clausewitz's work should perhaps be seen as less relevant to certain situations than others. One area which appears to still be relevant is Clausewitz's comments on the application of force. In the West today public opinion seems to favour engagements with minimal casualties - the public seem to want intervention when scenes of suffering are on TV (the so called CNN effect), but at the same time seem unwilling to tolerate the idea of people dying to stop the suffering24. This is a situation where Clausewitz noted that: "If one side uses force without compunction, undeterred by the bloodshed it involves while the other side refrain, the first will gain the upper hand".25 This idea seems to have been taken onboard by a number of third world leaders who have engaged in some form of conflict with Western Countries (primarily the USA). A good example of this is the conflicts in Somalia - when the USA sent in troops to help restore order to the country they were hampered by restrictive rules of engagement and limited amounts of equipment - for example tanks as these were felt inappropriate.26On the other hand, the opposition led by self styled Warlord ...read more.

Conclusion

18 Even then Clausewitz did not attempt to write on maritime operations - concentrating solely on land warfare. 19 The Next World War,p14, James Adams, 1998 Hutchinson. 20 A good example of this prediction was seen with the terrorist attack on the 11th of September. 21 Quote taken from www.gov.au/lwsc/publications/CA%eEssays/RMA 22 Flashpoint World War Three, p153-154, Andrew Murray, 1997, Pluto Press 23 On War, p228, Carl Von Clausewitz, (edited by Michael Howard & Peter Paret), 1984, Princeton University Press 24 Given the current situation in the USA it will be interesting to see whether the so called 'body bag' syndrome has ended or whether once US troops are killed, public opinion will change to demand a more peaceful solution. 25 On War, p75-76, Carl Von Clausewitz, (edited by Michael Howard & Peter Paret), 1984, Princeton University Press 26 Information taken from Deliver us From Evil, (Chapter 4), William Shawcross,2000, Bloomsbury. 27 Total American losses in Somalia were 30 dead, 175 wounded, the UN lost 72 killed and 87 wounded (Source World Conflicts, Patrick Brogan, 1998, Bloomsbury) 28 Deliver us from evil, p103, William Shawcross, 2000 Bloomsbury. 29 On War, p596, Carl Von Clausewitz, (edited by Michael Howard & Peter Paret), 1984, Princeton University Press 30 Clausewitz, Michael Howard, p39, 1983, Oxford University Press. (Professor Howard incorporates a quote from On War, p596, Carl Von Clausewitz, (edited by Michael Howard & Peter Paret), 1984, Princeton University Press) 31 One Hundred Days, p100, Admiral Sandy Woodward, 1992, Harper Collins 32 However - given the overwhelming amount of Western military power in the region and the political willpower to fight the war, it seems likely that Iraq would still have lost the war - whether Israel was a centre of gravity in the sense that it could remove the coalition from the war seems dubious. 33 Quote taken from www.Clausewitz.com, however text is from an article originally published in Joint Forces Quarterly, Winter 1995-1996 which is reproduced on the website. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Critical response to 'Adam's Ark'.

    to begin their race again shows how they are trying to survive and the last theme realism is involved because they are making decisions based on the facts that if they do not take these women and begin their race again they will almost certainly die out.

  2. While surfing the channels on TV you might hear a lot of news about ...

    (And naturally we mustn't forget that there are not only Arabian terrorists in the Middle East). In their struggle to bring an end to British rule over Palestine and to reclaim it for the Jewish people, radical Jewish groups such as the Stern Gang and the Irgun resorted to terrorist acts in the late 1940's.

  1. Khrushchev's attempts at modernisation.

    Gorbachev hoped that such competition would encourage an increase in efficiency and productivity throughout the economy and so reinvigorate Soviet society. It was a clear reaction against the centralised planning of the Stalin years. As Gorbachev himself put it, Perestroika is the development of democracy, socialist self-government, encouragement of initiative

  2. Armed forces.

    The Second World War was to put Britain in as much, if not more, peril than in the first. Her naval commanders rightly identified submarine warfare as being the biggest threat the island nation. The Royal and Merchant Navies took horrendous losses as these commanders developed ways of dealing with this silent menace.

  1. Forrest Gump; the Modern Day Fairytale

    they don't want to confront their own emotions, let alone explain them to a child. "Mamma always says..." The other woman in Forrests life; Jenny is not an apparent icon and seemingly not a good role model with the rocky route she chose in life.

  2. American History.

    - New technology reduced travel time and shipping greatly, stimulating the economy. *Sectors of the Market Economy: Commercial Farming* - Agriculture still remained the backbone of the economy in the market economy era - it just changed from self-sufficient household units producing enough for their sustenance to larger, market-oriented ventures.

  1. Russia: a Century of Upheaval.

    Eventually the mob realised that Russia needed to have a government of some kind, and accordingly went to the Tauride palace, where the Duma, or parliament met. The Duma realised it must act quickly, so they sent Roczianko onto the balcony, to announce the forming of a provisional government.

  2. What factors have prompted democratisation in Argentina?

    arrested and took prisoner its captives, thus leaving a 'paper trail' that could be followed. The regime took on a policy of denial. Any enquiries by the families of the desaparecidos were met by a 'brick wall;' the authorities denied the existence of the victims.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work