Do you agree that James I had more success with his 3rd and 4th parliaments than he had with his 1st and 2nd?

Authors Avatar

Daniel Pearson                History Essay, Mr Rendall

Do you agree that James I had more success

with his 3rd and 4th parliaments than

 he had with his 1st and 2nd?

The relationship between king and Parliament steadily eroded. Extravagant spending (particularly on James' favourites), inflation and bungled foreign policies discredited James in the eyes of Parliament. Parliament refused to give funds to a king who ignored their concerns and were annoyed by rewards given to favourites and great amounts spent on decoration.

James had enormous difficulties in coping with parliamentary criticism. The structure of English government made it impossible to raise sufficient revenue without parliaments, but his belief in the Divine Right of Kings made him unwilling to listen to criticism of his unpopular diplomatic schemes.

The early days of James’s 1st  parliament in 1604 were dominated by a tussle over parliamentary privilege. The questions on wardship and purveyance also surfaced early on in this parliament, but, although James showed some willingness to find a way to address these grievances, nothing was actually achieved.

Join now!

Other issue was to unite the two kingdoms of England and Scotland but was eventually abandoned in 1607 after much argueing.

Dissolved his first parliament in 1610 on anything but pleasant terms with its members complaining that ‘these seven years last past……our fame and actoins have been daily tossed like tennis balls amongst them, and all that spite and malice might do to disgrace and inflame us hath been used’.

James new parliament met in 1614, as it proved almost entirley unproductive and failed to pass any legislation, it became known as the addled parliament. The issue ...

This is a preview of the whole essay