• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do you agree that James I had more success with his 3rd and 4th parliaments than he had with his 1st and 2nd?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Do you agree that James I had more success with his 3rd and 4th parliaments than he had with his 1st and 2nd? The relationship between king and Parliament steadily eroded. Extravagant spending (particularly on James' favourites), inflation and bungled foreign policies discredited James in the eyes of Parliament. Parliament refused to give funds to a king who ignored their concerns and were annoyed by rewards given to favourites and great amounts spent on decoration. James had enormous difficulties in coping with parliamentary criticism. The structure of English government made it impossible to raise sufficient revenue without parliaments, but his belief in the Divine Right of Kings made him unwilling to listen to criticism of his unpopular diplomatic schemes. The early days of James's 1st parliament in 1604 were dominated by a tussle over parliamentary privilege. The questions on wardship and purveyance also surfaced early on in this parliament, but, although James showed some willingness to find a way to address these grievances, nothing was actually achieved. ...read more.

Middle

Followin the outbreak of major european war in 1618 james called a parliament at the beginning of 1621 to back up his commitment to go to war to recover palatinate which had been invaded by spanish troops the previous summer. They offered him two subsidies and then proceeeded to launch a full scale assualt upon monopolists who had purchased from the crown the sole right to manufacture certain basic commodities and who were thus able to sell inferior products at inflated prices. This attack brought about the arrest of two monopolists Sir Giles Mompesson and sir Francis Michell, and resulted in the impeachment of the lord chancellor, francis bacon. A bitter quarrel over whether the war which james had threatened should now be launched ensued. When the MP's called for the adoption of the alternative strategy of naval war on Spain and the termination of the marriage negotiations with madrid, James furiously reminded them that they had no right to discuss foreign policy and further claimed that they held their privileges only by royal favour. ...read more.

Conclusion

Conclusion With all these facts in mind I disagree with the statement that James' 3rd and 4th parliaments had more success than his 1st and 2nd. Although, they may not have achieved more,James was able to control over his 1st and 2nd parliament and could achieve what he wanted. The 3rd and 4th parliaments had to many people against James and members were turning the house against James and his decisions. Even the war against Spain took over 4 years to be finally declared. Members such as Prince Charles and the Duke of Buckingham were demanding freedom of speech. James didn't like this and again resulting in a tussle between crown and parliament. So non of the 4 parliaments that came into the commons were productive or didn't really achieve any success. So with this I conclude that none of the four parliaments that came into the commons were productive or didn't really achieve any success with James during this period, the statement therefore is false. Daniel Pearson History Essay, Mr Rendall ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. To what extent was there a Struggle for Power between Elizabeth I and her ...

    However the extent to which the issue shows a struggle for power between the Queen and Parliament is debatable. JE Neale has emphasised the role of the 'Puritan Choir' in the issue, pressuring Elizabeth to take a strongly Protestant successor and pushing for the execution of Mary who was a

  2. "Conflict and Contest" or "Cooperation and consent," which phrase best sums up Elizabeth I's ...

    House of Lords occurred is evidence that can be used to suggest that this view is not entirely correct, with regards to the 1559 parliament in which religion was discussed. Due to this, the Post-Revisionist view was developed, this states that in this particular session, there was no opposition to

  1. Was James 1st to blame for all the financial problems?

    In 1610 he admitted to parliament that he could not manage finances. This was quite like stating the obvious however due to his lavish ways and increasing debts. His favourites and chancellors also received a lot of money from James.

  2. The Portrait of a Lady. Discuss James representations of 'places' for women in this ...

    Her limitation as a sign is not represented as a source of conflict for Daisy herself. Any real exploration of the conflict of the girl being defined through her sign status, and her own consciousness of her individual freedom, needs the presentation of the heroine as an 'object of study'

  1. How influential was Dudley on the reign of Elizabeth 1st

    Elizabeth was forced to send Dudley from court until the funeral, but he did not attend the service. The queen sent Lady Norton as her representative, although it was known that other ladies had been asked but refused to go because of the scandal.

  2. Meddling and troublesome(TM)- how accurate a description is this of Elizabeth I(TM)s parliaments?

    It became clear in the years to follow that as far as Elizabeth was concerned, the time was never 'convenient' to discuss this particular issue. This was heavily linked to the problem of Mary Queen of Scots. Elizabeth's failure to name her successor led to ambiguity over who was to

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work