• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do you agree that the policies of Mikhail Gorbachev were the most important reasons for the collapse of Communist rule in Eastern Europe and the USSR?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Do you agree that the policies of Mikhail Gorbachev were the most important reasons for the collapse of Communist rule in Eastern Europe and the USSR? In 1985, Gorbachev succeeded Yuri Andropov as General Secretary of the USSR. Upon his appointment, Gorbachev quickly established an impression as a young, well-educated, energetic and quick-witted leader, who appeared to be different from his predecessors and was prepared to challenge old Communist ways. When Gorbachev came to power, he was determined to carry out reforms politically and economically to solve the pressing problems the USSR was facing, internally and externally. On 25 Dec 1991, Gorbachev publicly announced the dissolution of the Soviet Union, ending the 74 years of harsh communist rule in the USSR; it is obvious what profound significance Gorbachev's policies had towards the drastic changes in the communist bloc. Under his policies of Glasnost and Democratizatsiya, Gorbachev began to allow open debate on government policy and opinions were encouraged to be expressed openly. In March 1989, Gorbachev created the Congress of Peoples' Deputies in each republic within the Soviet Union, in which the people were presented a choice of candidates to vote for, including non-communist members. ...read more.

Middle

In external affairs, Gorbachev followed the moderate Sinatra Doctrine. His response to the Solidarity movement in Poland was that the Soviet Union would no longer send in troops to pop up unpopular Communist governments, and that the leaders of Eastern Europe should listen to their peoples. As a result, free elections were held in Poland in 1989, Solidarity gained 99 out of 100 seats in the Polish Senate; it was the end of Communist rule in Poland. In addition to that, when Gorbachev visited East Germany in Oct 1989, there were enormous demonstrations. However, Gorbachev once again made it clear that Soviet tanks would not move in to restore order, and he asked the East German leader Erich Honecker to reform. A month later the Berlin Wall which symbolises the barrier between East and West Germany was dismantled. Therefore, Gorbachev's response gave people in Eastern Europe hope that the USSR was softening its policies against oppositions. This had a 'dominos' effect in democratic movements in Eastern Europe; communist governments collapsed one after another: Poland, Hungary, East Germany, Czechoslovakia, Bulgaria and Romania. ...read more.

Conclusion

He was still a loyal believer in Communism. His policies were aimed to achieve the purest and final stage of Communism, so that the Communist rule could be strengthened. Despite his policies, it was the things happened beyond his control which led to the collapse of Communism. The Communist rule collapsed from the outside. The Solidarity movement in Poland triggered the events that happened in Eastern Europe. Soviet-controlled countries declared independence one after another in a shockingly fast pace. By the end of 1989, it was obvious that the 'Iron Curtain' had been lifted; the Soviet empire ceased to exist. At his home country, when Boris Yeltsin declared the Russian Republic to be independent, there was no longer anything Gorbachev could do to save the situation. In conclusion, the Soviet Union was clearly doomed in the 1980s. Economic problems were apparent, living standards were far below that in the West, and it had clearly lost the Arms Race. The Soviet people had had enough what Communism had brought them. Had Gorbachev done nothing, somebody would have acted and the USSR would have eventually collapsed because of its own impossibility. ?? ?? ?? ?? History Essay 5/10/2007 Dominic Wong ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Was the collapse of the USSR historically inevitable?

    4 star(s)

    Third, internal factors have happened. Soviet society changes profoundly in the 70' and 80' because of economic and demographic trends and led to spread of cynicism among the youth9. The reform of Gorbachev to remedy the country's ill and to rejuvenate the society failed. The youth, more westernised want to benefit the marketisation.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    The collapse of the USSR was caused by internal problems and had nothing to ...

    4 star(s)

    the Soviet economy and the increasingly confrontational stance of the USA?s foreign policy towards the USSR which first saw light in containment, thus leading to its eventual collapse in 1991. Furthermore, the reforms brought forth internally in the USSR in the final years of her existence placed the Soviet Union

  1. Why did tension increase in Europe between 1900 and 1914?

    Why did Stalin blockade Berlin? * The main reason for the blockade was that Great Britain and the USA had made it clear that they intended to rebuild the economy in their zones of Germany. In 1947 the British and US zones were joined together in 'Bizonia' and the French zone was added in 1948.

  2. How far should Gorbachev be blamed for the collapse of the Soviet Union?

    Representatives such as Boris Yeltsin, Andrei Sakharov and Baltic representatives, all rebellious activists against the Soviet Union, voiced a third of the Soviet Union. In such a speech Sakharov called for the abolition of the party's leading role and Gorbachev was powerless to act against him.

  1. The causes of the collapse of the USSR.

    The justification for socialism's existance lay exclusively on the premise that it was a superior mode of production that capitalism. But USSR simply couldn't keep up with the western world. During the 1960s, USA experianced growth of 52.8%. Compared to capitalism, "the planned economy performed inadequately"(27).

  2. How important were developments in Eastern Europe to the collapse of the Soviet Union?

    It was instead the buildup of a series of events which punched blows into the Soviet Union's survival, such as the failed coup of 1991, Alma-Ata Protocol, Yeltsin banning the CPSU in Russia, the Ukraine referendum, declaration of the Commonwealth of Independent States, resignation of Gorbachev, followed by the Supreme Soviet.

  1. Was the West justified in ignoring the 1956 events in Hungary and Poland as ...

    West, in China and "even within the USSR".3 If the events of October 18-23, 1956 do not prove that a rebel Communist leader can deter Soviet intervention by mobilising his nation for armed resistance, the Polish October at least suggests that the Soviets are more likely to accept protestations of

  2. In what ways, for what reasons and with what success have the Eastern and ...

    If we are concerned to avert nuclear war, our primary concern should be to lessen tensions and conflicts at the points where war engaging the superpowers is likely to erupt. (Naom Chomsky, "Interventionism and Nuclear War") During the years from the late 1960s to the early 1980s, numerous endeavors of

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work