• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do you agree that the wartime alliance between the USA and the Soviet Union during WW2 was bound to fail once the war ended?

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Do you agree that the wartime alliance between the USA and the Soviet Union during WW2 was bound to fail once the war ended? The members of the wartime alliance were very different prior to and throughout WW2, particularly in their attitudes towards each other, their own country and the rest of the world and it was this that continuously threatened the stability of the alliance. The result was that the alliance collapsed within 2 months of the war ending, leaving behind bitter enemies of USA and USSR before the start of the Cold War. The wartime alliance was based primarily on pragmatism and expediency, which worked for the duration of the war. Both the USA and the Soviets in particular hated Hitler and it therefore seemed natural for an alliance to be formed. However it was not based on ideology; something both countries displayed as being very strong but also very different. The USA was a capitalist country committed to the individual pursuit of wealth seeing this as the rationale for society. The USSR on the other hand was very communist believing in shared, collective wealth and the strength of society as a whole. ...read more.


Similarly the USA also wanted a buffer zone in the form of a strong Germany to protect them from a strong Russia which, prior to the war, had seen substantial economic growth in the 1930?s and could become a threat to USA?s dominance. The USA wanted open markets to maximise their trading opportunities and increase and maintain their profit levels. Whilst this would benefit everyone it would be particularly beneficial to the US following their economic dominance throughout the 1920?s. Of course the Soviets, being communist wanted a closed trading system whereby they only trade with other communist countries, blocking exploitative advances from the west. Another element to the breakup of the alliance is that before the war, neither the USA nor USSR wanted world power, despite economic dominance and economic growth respectively. After WW2 with the responsibilities of reshaping the post war world, the possibilities towards changing the world favourably for their country both economically and politically became more apparent. There was a power vacuum which both the USA and Russia had the potential to fill, causing tensions and even aggression during the post war conferences with little room for compromise from either side of the alliance. ...read more.


To conclude, the wartime alliance was never going to work beyond the duration of the war. It was created for the war and therefore not designed for any longer term existence. The ideologies and principles of the USA and USSR were so far removed that they struggled to find any common ground, thus creating a constant tension and mutual suspicion which was underlying cause of the breakup of the alliance. However, while both powers were partly to blame, the aggression and insensitivity of the USA towards the USSR is ultimately the reason for the failure of the alliance. The USSR was in a much worse situation at the end of the war than the USA because of the USA?s lack of action in the war in comparison to that of the USSR. The USA should have been prepared to compromise on behalf of the efforts the Soviets made during the war and yet they were so fearful of communism that they treated the USSR with a lot of suspicion. Less suspicion and more support for the broken USSR might have lessened Stalin?s doubt about the motives of the USA and actually helped the wartime alliance to continue for longer. Ultimately, the wartime alliance was just that, created and lasting for purely wartime. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level History of the USA, 1840-1968 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level History of the USA, 1840-1968 essays

  1. How far do you agree with this description of the prosperity of the USA ...

    But the introduction of credit caused many people to spend way beyond their means to keep up with the craze of buying new and exciting consumer goods. $7 billion worth of goods was bought on credit during the time period, this lead to a staggering amount of debt and repossessions.

  2. Revision notes - the USA 1945 to 1980

    1955 Martin Luther King and the Montgomery Bus Boycott. The civil rights movement began in earnest when martin Luther King formed the MIA or Montgomery Improvement Association. In Montgomery Alabama. The MIA decided they were going to protest at the segregation of busses by refusing to ride the bus and boycotting the bus company.

  1. In considering the development of the USA in the years 1815-1917, how far can ...

    This Act was before the Civil War therefore there was a progressive focus on Native Americans, as a result the union victory did not develop Native American lives it was just a continuation. In the 1870's the discovery of gold in the Dakota hill drew numerous white settles in the

  2. Never Ending Racisim

    Now when both of these people go to apply to a college with the same grades and scores on the SAT I think that an advantage should be given to the person who had to work twice as hard to get there.

  1. How far do you agree that the impact of WW2 was the main reason ...

    Sweatt won the case and was enrolled at the school, thanks to the NAACP backing the case and bringing it to the Supreme Court. The case was influential in the landmark case of Brown v. Board of Education four years later.

  2. Describe Wilsons Fourteen points, Why did Congress fail to ratify the Peace Settlement?

    The mostly symbolic Kellog-Briand Pact of 1928 produced an optimistic agreement signed by 15 nations in Paris, rejecting war as a way of solving international disputes. Although completely useless, it showed willingness on America?s part to engage diplomatically, and expressed a hope for peace.

  1. How Far Do You Agree That The Impact Of World War 2 Was The ...

    Hence De Jure legislation could not be converted into De Facto change, a fate which was also suffered by the work of the NAACP. The De Jure victories of Civil Rights organizations were critical in improving the lives and opportunities that Afro-Americans had, particularly the NAACP who constantly challenged segregation through the legal system e.g.

  2. Religion in the West -The United Brethren Missionary Train to Oregon

    We accordingly waited until ten o?clock when we found we had about 75 wagons and one hundred men. We then moved on cautiously to the fort when lo and behold! There was scarcely an Indian to be seen, and everything as quite as a country village.[9] This near miss of

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work