• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do you agree with the suggestion in Source N that Henry and Wolsey conducted an effective foreign policy in the years 1515-1525? Explain your answers using Sources L, M and N and your own knowledge.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Alex Singh Do you agree with the suggestion in Source N that Henry and Wolsey conducted an effective foreign policy in the years 1515-1525? Explain your answers using Sources L, M and N and your own knowledge. (40 marks) Source N suggests that both Henry and Wolsey did conduct an effective foreign policy from 1515 ? 1525 for the size of England and the finances this country had available .Overall, I disagree with the suggestion in the question and all three sources in one way or another justify my reasoning for disagreeing. However there are some reasons, backed up by sources L and N that agree with the suggestion that Henry and Wolsey conducted an effective foreign policy, which I have taken into account in my essay. Source N, as the question states, does to some degree, agree that Henry and Wolsey conducted an effective foreign policy. The author, David Grossell, published the book Henry VIII 1509-1529, in 1998; so it?s a secondary source however the dates 1509-1529 is when Henry started his reign till when Wolsey was dismissed from the public office. ...read more.

Middle

But source L does agree with what Source N says about Henry winning glory honour and prestige. The Field of the Cloth of Gold was a meeting between Henry and Francis to build their friendship and took place just outside Calais. It was an extravagant event with both Francis and Henry ultimately trying to show off as much as they possibly could. It agrees with the suggestion and what Source N says by the fact the event did earn Henry prestige as it was such a marvellous meeting, as we can see from the painting between the two and all their most important men and kind of put him on the map that was Europe which was dominated by mostly Charles and Francis. It was also good because it was a lot cheaper than war so that benefited the country and also contributed to Wolsey and Henry attempting to maintain an effective foreign policy. However sources L, M and N all disagree with the suggestion the foreign policy was effective. Despite source L to some points agreeing that it was effective; it also contradicts its purpose to increase the effectiveness of the foreign policy as actually it didn?t do exactly what Henry and Wolsey had hoped. ...read more.

Conclusion

This contemplates how effective the foreign policy conducted by Henry and Wolsey was. If there?s an uproar from the public and even the Dukes of Norfolk and Suffolk are asking ?for the King?s highness to call his council, to debate and determine what is best to be done? because of Henry?s determination to be so powerful amongst the rest of Europe yet not be able to control what is going on in the most important country to him of all, then he and Wolsey cannot conduct an effective foreign policy. Overall, from the sources and my own knowledge I have come to learn that I disagree with the suggestion that Henry and Wolsey conducted an effective foreign policy between 1515 and 1525. Despite the attempts to become a leading authority in foreign affairs with Francis and Charles V, such as the Field of the Cloth of Gold, it was hugely unrealistic for the size and wealth of the country. However to some extent, Henry and Wolsey did earn prestige amongst some of Europe, they ?failed to bring great gains to the country.? And the effectiveness of the foreign policy was poor because to the simplicity of his policy was that Henry wanted much more authority and dominance in Europe than was possible. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    How successful was English foreign policy in the years 1509 1529?

    4 star(s)

    Charles' response was that in 1527 he marched into Rome and captured Pope Clement VII - because of this Wolsey's alliance collapsed - and Charles was left pulling all the strings. Because of this, Wolsey was becoming increasingly unpopular - his policies had failed and had proved expensive; an expense

  2. Marked by a teacher

    'In His Domestic Policy Between 1515 and 1529 Wolsey Promised Much But Achieved Little' ...

    4 star(s)

    He had now achieved the almighty challenge of separating the King from influences, thus maintaining his power. He revelled in the King's favour, and had almost abolished the fighting in Courts that had taken place before Wolsey cam to power.

  1. With what success did Wolsey pursue his aims in foreign policy?

    trade, France was defeated at Landriano in 1529 and both the Pope and France made peace with Charles, it all led to England being completely isolated. The treaty of Cambrai was really Wolsey's last effort in foreign policy, and it was not a good one.

  2. Examine the Degree to which Wolsey was responsible for his own downfall

    Parliament, which he had kept at arms length, was hostile; he was hated by the nobility, and his general unpopularity is reflected in Skelton's satires. Even churchmen had been alienated by his suppression of monasteries and by his monopoly of ecclesiastical power; and his only support was the King, who had determination to rule himself.

  1. What Methods did Henry VIII and Wolsey use to achieve the aims of Foreign ...

    Therefore Henry sent troops against the Scots and defeated and killed James IV at the battle of Flodden. Since the heir was only 1 year old, his sister Margaret took over acting as Regent. This seemed to be the ideal situation, as the Scottish threat would be diminished for years.

  2. Labour and the Five Giants

    This had increased to 68% by the late 1950's. The importance of this social security system was that it was the first to cover all areas. In the early 1950's Rowntree revealed that poverty had been reduced to just 2%. On the other hand, Labour was only solely responsible for one of the four policies and national assistance was

  1. How successful was Wolseys foreign policy in satisfying the ambitions of Henry VIII in ...

    Henry?s policy in France benefited him slightly by collecting a pension from the French, but is failure as it shows he can be manipulated by other powers and lost huge amounts of money on war. On a financial level the wars with France did have some bonuses one being the pensions they would receive due to the peace treaties.

  2. Wives & War: To what extent did these two aspects undermine Henry VIIIs rule ...

    Henry seemed to have transformed in becoming a much more alert and confident individual. Nonetheless as Hume (1889, pg 77) questions Katherine was more than happy to accept Henry?s love for his gifts as ?the king had no wife who made him spend so much money in dresses and jewels

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work