• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do you agree with the suggestion in Source N that Henry and Wolsey conducted an effective foreign policy in the years 1515-1525? Explain your answers using Sources L, M and N and your own knowledge.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Alex Singh Do you agree with the suggestion in Source N that Henry and Wolsey conducted an effective foreign policy in the years 1515-1525? Explain your answers using Sources L, M and N and your own knowledge. (40 marks) Source N suggests that both Henry and Wolsey did conduct an effective foreign policy from 1515 ? 1525 for the size of England and the finances this country had available .Overall, I disagree with the suggestion in the question and all three sources in one way or another justify my reasoning for disagreeing. However there are some reasons, backed up by sources L and N that agree with the suggestion that Henry and Wolsey conducted an effective foreign policy, which I have taken into account in my essay. Source N, as the question states, does to some degree, agree that Henry and Wolsey conducted an effective foreign policy. The author, David Grossell, published the book Henry VIII 1509-1529, in 1998; so it?s a secondary source however the dates 1509-1529 is when Henry started his reign till when Wolsey was dismissed from the public office. ...read more.

Middle

But source L does agree with what Source N says about Henry winning glory honour and prestige. The Field of the Cloth of Gold was a meeting between Henry and Francis to build their friendship and took place just outside Calais. It was an extravagant event with both Francis and Henry ultimately trying to show off as much as they possibly could. It agrees with the suggestion and what Source N says by the fact the event did earn Henry prestige as it was such a marvellous meeting, as we can see from the painting between the two and all their most important men and kind of put him on the map that was Europe which was dominated by mostly Charles and Francis. It was also good because it was a lot cheaper than war so that benefited the country and also contributed to Wolsey and Henry attempting to maintain an effective foreign policy. However sources L, M and N all disagree with the suggestion the foreign policy was effective. Despite source L to some points agreeing that it was effective; it also contradicts its purpose to increase the effectiveness of the foreign policy as actually it didn?t do exactly what Henry and Wolsey had hoped. ...read more.

Conclusion

This contemplates how effective the foreign policy conducted by Henry and Wolsey was. If there?s an uproar from the public and even the Dukes of Norfolk and Suffolk are asking ?for the King?s highness to call his council, to debate and determine what is best to be done? because of Henry?s determination to be so powerful amongst the rest of Europe yet not be able to control what is going on in the most important country to him of all, then he and Wolsey cannot conduct an effective foreign policy. Overall, from the sources and my own knowledge I have come to learn that I disagree with the suggestion that Henry and Wolsey conducted an effective foreign policy between 1515 and 1525. Despite the attempts to become a leading authority in foreign affairs with Francis and Charles V, such as the Field of the Cloth of Gold, it was hugely unrealistic for the size and wealth of the country. However to some extent, Henry and Wolsey did earn prestige amongst some of Europe, they ?failed to bring great gains to the country.? And the effectiveness of the foreign policy was poor because to the simplicity of his policy was that Henry wanted much more authority and dominance in Europe than was possible. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    How successful was English foreign policy in the years 1509 1529?

    4 star(s)

    Unfortunately, the only one able to grant it was the Pope - who was being held prisoner by Charles V. There were two reasons that this left Henry stuck; the Pope would not disobey Charles and risk being killed, and Charles was the nephew of Catherine, and would not want

  2. Marked by a teacher

    'In His Domestic Policy Between 1515 and 1529 Wolsey Promised Much But Achieved Little' ...

    4 star(s)

    and 1525, we used many of them as ambassadors abroad, and to take command of military and naval schemes in France. Wolsey had been very clever, and achieved greatly in this aspect; he had sent the 'Gentlemen' into the war, where they would undoubtedly be killed.

  1. Henry VIII'S Foreign Policy.

    Wolsey aimed to meet the entire costs of war from the lay and clerical purse, for which reason he had improved the system of assessing individuals for taxation purposes with the Tudor subsidy (introduced in 1513). This was a radical departure from previous practices and explains many of the difficulties

  2. Examine the Degree to which Wolsey was responsible for his own downfall

    Wolsey's consolation was to delay the commitment to war until May 1522. Peter Gwyn though argues that Wolsey was not looking for peace, but was a tough and uncompromising negotiator, who hoodwinked e French while conducting serious negotiations with Charles.

  1. With what success did Wolsey pursue his aims in foreign policy?

    It did not work: Bourbon was unable to gather enough support for a three pronged attack to work and Charles's troops managed little either. The English troops therefore withdrew. A success? Obviously not. Wolsey changed his policy to aggressiveness for unknown, but clearly unsound reasons and it did not pay

  2. To what extent can Wolseys foreign policy in the years 1512-29 be viewed as ...

    best possible deal out of the Emperor and avoid a commitment to war, he kept communications with France open. Wolsey?s foreign policy was successful as it pleased and satisfied Henry. Wolsey?s Policies made Henry look like a chivalric King. The Battle of Flodden in 1513, while Henry was campaigning against

  1. How successful was Wolseys foreign policy in satisfying the ambitions of Henry VIII in ...

    Henry?s policy in France benefited him slightly by collecting a pension from the French, but is failure as it shows he can be manipulated by other powers and lost huge amounts of money on war. On a financial level the wars with France did have some bonuses one being the pensions they would receive due to the peace treaties.

  2. How far do the sources suggest that there was considerable resistance to the Amicable ...

    Source three links to this source as it says ?In some places people arose up in arms against the commissioners? which supports the point made that the commissioners were too scared to enforce the Amicable Grant as they feared the people and what they would do.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work