• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do you agree with the suggestion in Source N that Henry and Wolsey conducted an effective foreign policy in the years 1515-1525? Explain your answers using Sources L, M and N and your own knowledge.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Alex Singh Do you agree with the suggestion in Source N that Henry and Wolsey conducted an effective foreign policy in the years 1515-1525? Explain your answers using Sources L, M and N and your own knowledge. (40 marks) Source N suggests that both Henry and Wolsey did conduct an effective foreign policy from 1515 ? 1525 for the size of England and the finances this country had available .Overall, I disagree with the suggestion in the question and all three sources in one way or another justify my reasoning for disagreeing. However there are some reasons, backed up by sources L and N that agree with the suggestion that Henry and Wolsey conducted an effective foreign policy, which I have taken into account in my essay. Source N, as the question states, does to some degree, agree that Henry and Wolsey conducted an effective foreign policy. The author, David Grossell, published the book Henry VIII 1509-1529, in 1998; so it?s a secondary source however the dates 1509-1529 is when Henry started his reign till when Wolsey was dismissed from the public office. ...read more.

Middle

But source L does agree with what Source N says about Henry winning glory honour and prestige. The Field of the Cloth of Gold was a meeting between Henry and Francis to build their friendship and took place just outside Calais. It was an extravagant event with both Francis and Henry ultimately trying to show off as much as they possibly could. It agrees with the suggestion and what Source N says by the fact the event did earn Henry prestige as it was such a marvellous meeting, as we can see from the painting between the two and all their most important men and kind of put him on the map that was Europe which was dominated by mostly Charles and Francis. It was also good because it was a lot cheaper than war so that benefited the country and also contributed to Wolsey and Henry attempting to maintain an effective foreign policy. However sources L, M and N all disagree with the suggestion the foreign policy was effective. Despite source L to some points agreeing that it was effective; it also contradicts its purpose to increase the effectiveness of the foreign policy as actually it didn?t do exactly what Henry and Wolsey had hoped. ...read more.

Conclusion

This contemplates how effective the foreign policy conducted by Henry and Wolsey was. If there?s an uproar from the public and even the Dukes of Norfolk and Suffolk are asking ?for the King?s highness to call his council, to debate and determine what is best to be done? because of Henry?s determination to be so powerful amongst the rest of Europe yet not be able to control what is going on in the most important country to him of all, then he and Wolsey cannot conduct an effective foreign policy. Overall, from the sources and my own knowledge I have come to learn that I disagree with the suggestion that Henry and Wolsey conducted an effective foreign policy between 1515 and 1525. Despite the attempts to become a leading authority in foreign affairs with Francis and Charles V, such as the Field of the Cloth of Gold, it was hugely unrealistic for the size and wealth of the country. However to some extent, Henry and Wolsey did earn prestige amongst some of Europe, they ?failed to bring great gains to the country.? And the effectiveness of the foreign policy was poor because to the simplicity of his policy was that Henry wanted much more authority and dominance in Europe than was possible. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    How successful was English foreign policy in the years 1509 1529?

    4 star(s)

    Unfortunately, the only one able to grant it was the Pope - who was being held prisoner by Charles V. There were two reasons that this left Henry stuck; the Pope would not disobey Charles and risk being killed, and Charles was the nephew of Catherine, and would not want

  2. Marked by a teacher

    'In His Domestic Policy Between 1515 and 1529 Wolsey Promised Much But Achieved Little' ...

    4 star(s)

    He had now achieved the almighty challenge of separating the King from influences, thus maintaining his power. He revelled in the King's favour, and had almost abolished the fighting in Courts that had taken place before Wolsey cam to power.

  1. With what success did Wolsey pursue his aims in foreign policy?

    trade, France was defeated at Landriano in 1529 and both the Pope and France made peace with Charles, it all led to England being completely isolated. The treaty of Cambrai was really Wolsey's last effort in foreign policy, and it was not a good one.

  2. Examine the Degree to which Wolsey was responsible for his own downfall

    Wolsey's foreign policy was another factor to his downfall, his foreign policy was a vigorous one involving a constant shifting pattern of alliance. Wolsey's behaviour between Charles V and Francis I has been much discussed. Scarisbrick has argued that Wolsey always wanted peace and that there was an underlying conflict with Henry.

  1. What Methods did Henry VIII and Wolsey use to achieve the aims of Foreign ...

    The aim from this point was to have English control over politics and to break up the link with France. However the French then sent the earl of Albany who was James V's uncle and became acting regent for James V for pro-French policies and created enough unrest to forced Margaret to flee.

  2. 'The years 1509 - 1515 shows far more continuity than change in comparison to ...

    This contrasts greatly with his father, because Henry VII took his government under his wing and did all he could to help it, however, this could also be seen by the view of the government was already self-sufficient from Henry VII's reign when it was passed onto Henry VII, so not much had to be done.

  1. How successful was Wolseys foreign policy in satisfying the ambitions of Henry VIII in ...

    Henry?s policy in France benefited him slightly by collecting a pension from the French, but is failure as it shows he can be manipulated by other powers and lost huge amounts of money on war. On a financial level the wars with France did have some bonuses one being the pensions they would receive due to the peace treaties.

  2. How far do the sources suggest that there was considerable resistance to the Amicable ...

    Source three links to this source as it says ?In some places people arose up in arms against the commissioners? which supports the point made that the commissioners were too scared to enforce the Amicable Grant as they feared the people and what they would do.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work