• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do you agree with the suggestion in Source N that Henry and Wolsey conducted an effective foreign policy in the years 1515-1525? Explain your answers using Sources L, M and N and your own knowledge.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Alex Singh Do you agree with the suggestion in Source N that Henry and Wolsey conducted an effective foreign policy in the years 1515-1525? Explain your answers using Sources L, M and N and your own knowledge. (40 marks) Source N suggests that both Henry and Wolsey did conduct an effective foreign policy from 1515 ? 1525 for the size of England and the finances this country had available .Overall, I disagree with the suggestion in the question and all three sources in one way or another justify my reasoning for disagreeing. However there are some reasons, backed up by sources L and N that agree with the suggestion that Henry and Wolsey conducted an effective foreign policy, which I have taken into account in my essay. Source N, as the question states, does to some degree, agree that Henry and Wolsey conducted an effective foreign policy. The author, David Grossell, published the book Henry VIII 1509-1529, in 1998; so it?s a secondary source however the dates 1509-1529 is when Henry started his reign till when Wolsey was dismissed from the public office. ...read more.

Middle

But source L does agree with what Source N says about Henry winning glory honour and prestige. The Field of the Cloth of Gold was a meeting between Henry and Francis to build their friendship and took place just outside Calais. It was an extravagant event with both Francis and Henry ultimately trying to show off as much as they possibly could. It agrees with the suggestion and what Source N says by the fact the event did earn Henry prestige as it was such a marvellous meeting, as we can see from the painting between the two and all their most important men and kind of put him on the map that was Europe which was dominated by mostly Charles and Francis. It was also good because it was a lot cheaper than war so that benefited the country and also contributed to Wolsey and Henry attempting to maintain an effective foreign policy. However sources L, M and N all disagree with the suggestion the foreign policy was effective. Despite source L to some points agreeing that it was effective; it also contradicts its purpose to increase the effectiveness of the foreign policy as actually it didn?t do exactly what Henry and Wolsey had hoped. ...read more.

Conclusion

This contemplates how effective the foreign policy conducted by Henry and Wolsey was. If there?s an uproar from the public and even the Dukes of Norfolk and Suffolk are asking ?for the King?s highness to call his council, to debate and determine what is best to be done? because of Henry?s determination to be so powerful amongst the rest of Europe yet not be able to control what is going on in the most important country to him of all, then he and Wolsey cannot conduct an effective foreign policy. Overall, from the sources and my own knowledge I have come to learn that I disagree with the suggestion that Henry and Wolsey conducted an effective foreign policy between 1515 and 1525. Despite the attempts to become a leading authority in foreign affairs with Francis and Charles V, such as the Field of the Cloth of Gold, it was hugely unrealistic for the size and wealth of the country. However to some extent, Henry and Wolsey did earn prestige amongst some of Europe, they ?failed to bring great gains to the country.? And the effectiveness of the foreign policy was poor because to the simplicity of his policy was that Henry wanted much more authority and dominance in Europe than was possible. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    How successful was English foreign policy in the years 1509 1529?

    4 star(s)

    Henry divorcing his aunt - if only to infuriate Henry, and not out of any affection for her. In January 1528, Henry found himself in the situation where he was virtually at war with Charles V. It was never intended to be a proper full scale war, but was declared

  2. Henry VIII'S Foreign Policy.

    Wolsey aimed to meet the entire costs of war from the lay and clerical purse, for which reason he had improved the system of assessing individuals for taxation purposes with the Tudor subsidy (introduced in 1513). This was a radical departure from previous practices and explains many of the difficulties

  1. Do you agree with the view that Elizabeth(TM)s foreign policy was less effective in ...

    The mere fact that England was ultimately successful in winning the war with Spain does not necessarily mean that the war itself was conducted successfully. At three points in 1589, 1591 and 1596, Elizabeth is believed to have understood that settlement was at hand, but each time Elizabeth failed to

  2. How do the poets in 'Charlotte O'Neils song' and 'Nothing Changed' show their feelings ...

    The poet also shows his anger by the way he ends the poem with a desire to stone the building. He is just as angry now as he was a s a young man. Hope this helps. Submitted by: David Tutty, (Age 16)

  1. To what extent can Wolseys foreign policy in the years 1512-29 be viewed as ...

    best possible deal out of the Emperor and avoid a commitment to war, he kept communications with France open. Wolsey?s foreign policy was successful as it pleased and satisfied Henry. Wolsey?s Policies made Henry look like a chivalric King. The Battle of Flodden in 1513, while Henry was campaigning against

  2. How far do the sources suggest that there was considerable resistance to the Amicable ...

    This link also shows us that there was a considerable resistance against the Amicable Grant as people were arising in arms against the commissioners to stop it from happening. Source 1 was written by William Warham who was acted as a commissioner in Kent for the Amicable Grant.

  1. Wives & War: To what extent did these two aspects undermine Henry VIIIs rule ...

    A defection however is made known as Katherine herself was a devoted Protestant which ultimately was icy ground for a queen to uphold, as Henry conducted executions upon Protestants for blasphemies beliefs (Porter 2010, pg 202), however it could be questioned if this is speculated opinion.

  2. How successful was Wolseys foreign policy in satisfying the ambitions of Henry VIII in ...

    Wolsey was the one who very effectively organised the second attempt on besieging France and made the peace agreements between the two nations in 1514, so it could be argued that the foreign policy towards the French at the time was policy?s that of Wolsey not Henry.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work