• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do you agree with the view that Henry VII owed his crown to the support of the Stanley's?

Extracts from this document...


Do you agree with the view that Henry VII owed his success in attaining the crown mainly to the support of the Stanley's? In 1485, England and her dominions had a new monarch, the fifth in a period less than twenty years, but how much was Henry Tudor's success in attaining the crown due to the Stanley's. Since the death of Edward III their were disputes about who was the rightful king of England, these disputes were not just arguments but whole parts of the aristocracy were at war with each other, this is an era known as the Wars of the Roses. The claimants of the throne were either from the House of Lancaster descended from John of Gaunt or the House of York descended from Richard, Duke of York. Henry Tudor was a Lancastrian descended for John of Gaunt through his mother who in turn was from illegitimate offspring of John of Gaunt, this made his position precarious, because his position was so weak, but what gave Henry a real chance of obtaining the throne was that there were no adult children with a better claim. Illegitimacy was frowned upon in the medieval aristocracy because the law stated that no illegitimate child could inherit and none of their offspring would be claimants either, therefore making Henry's claim to the throne void. ...read more.


Also the Stanley's wealth could be used to stabilize his position as King if he won the battle e.g. bribing noblemen into allegiance. Overall the case of Henry VII owing his success in attaining the crown to the support of the Stanley's is quite strong, they were not just a military force but a force with influence and wealth. So you could say without the support of the Stanley's Henry would have lost his life by either being executed by Richard post-Bosworth or defeated in one on one combat with Richard on the field. It would be very naive to say that there were not other reasons why Henry Tudor attained the crown in 1485, not just due to Stanley support, Henry's support came from other place as well. The French king Charles XIII lent out thousands of French mercenary's to Henry with the hope that Henry would become king and not threaten France with invasion. Although the Stanley's provided an extra 3000 there were more than 3000 given by Charles. Also the Stanley's were not the only aristocrats to support Henry, the Duke of Northumberland and Earl of Westmoreland are other examples. So as the majority of Henry's force was not from the Stanley's then it could be said that he did not completely owe his success to the support of the Stanley's. ...read more.


This shows that Richards action, of summoning men that weren't committed to him to fight, was one cause of Henry Tudor attaining the crown. To conclude, I believe that the Henry Tudor attained the crown of England not just to the support of the Stanley's so I disagree with the question. The Stanley's were the last cause in a long line of causes which brought Henry to the throne and caused Richard to lose it. The Stanley's are looked upon as being the main cause, this may have been true at Bosworth but in the years leading up to it many other causes mounted up against Richard. Henry attained the throne from support from France, exiled Nobles, diehard Lancastrians, the Woodville's and also the Stanley's. It would be wrong to say that the whole reason why Henry Tudor became Henry VII was because Stanley Knights killed Richard, yes , it did end the battle but it did not end the War and secure Henry's position, these political alliances were formed months or years before Bosworth and without those political alliances Henry would not have even reached Bosworth and British history would have been very different to what we know it today. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. The Battle of Bosworth.

    the place where the marsh would be is now covered with a forest. The area can be seen below in the picture: Henry himself, inexperienced in battle did not control his own flank. Polydore Vergil reports that Henry, "made a slender vanward for the small number of his people; before

  2. Success of Henry VII in strengthening the financial position of the Crown.

    Feudal dues. Feudal dues were paid be people who held land from the king in return for military service. Feudal dues included: * Wardship, in which the king took control in the estates of minors until they came an age.

  1. This essay examines the actions of Charles VII in relation to events pertaining to ...

    under scrutiny during the Trial of Rehabilitation.44 The motive for the reassessment was the struggle of power between the church and the state. Charles was preoccupied in establishing the rights and authorities held by monarchs and nobles in the ecclesiastical atmosphere of France, thus weakening the reach of the papacy

  2. How important was foreign support for Henry Tudor in explaining Richard III

    When Thomas joined he brought additional 1800-2000 men who would fight on Tudor's behalf. Tudor continues to march and picked up support from Sir Richard Corbet who added 800 men (Corbet was Sir William Stanley's step-son then his numbers increased again when Sir Gilbert Talbot added 500 men to the cause.

  1. How useful is a visit to the Tudor parts of Hampton Court to find ...

    The intention of the hall and its extravagant decoration was to give all visitors a sense of Henry's importance and to reflect his Kingship, the clear message being that Henry was an extremely important man, he had a lot of power and influence and equally as important he had a lot of money.

  2. How Secure was Henry VII?

    He was never a real threat to Henry and the events lasted less than one year and Simnel never had much evidence he was real and the rebel support he gained was easily defeated by Henry. However the second pretender to the throne was more of a threat, his name

  1. Why did Henry VII win the Battle of Bosworth?

    Henry?s confidence as a military leader by being forward thinking and taking his initiative could instead be responsible in gaining the Stanleys support rather than it being completely down to luck. Richard?s tactical errors in the battle also contributed to why Henry won.

  2. How far do you agree with the view that Henry VII owed his success ...

    Therefore the Stanleys held significant importance to the battle and Henry would not have won without them. After suspecting doubts in their loyalty Richard held George Stanley, Thomas Stanley?s son, hostage. When the Stanleys decided that they would support the Lancastrians Richard ordered for George to be beheaded, however this act was never carried through.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work