• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do you agree with the view that the 1832 reform act was a conservative measure with limited effects?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

b) Do you agree with the view that the 1832 reform act was a conservative measure with limited effects? In this essay i plan to look at the statement that the 1832 Reform act was a conservative measure with limited effect. To do this i plan to not only use my knowledge of it but to analyse some primary sources from the time and secondary sources published afterwards. However before i start i think it would be important to define the term conservative. Wikipedia defines it as "Conservatism (Latin: conservare, "to preserve")[1] is a political and social philosophy that promotes the maintenance of traditional institutions and supports, at the most, minimal and gradual change in society. " Firstly i plan to look at the reasoning behind agreement with the statement. Firstly in agreement with the statement was the fact that it only secured voting rights for a very select bunch of people. This is very much inkeeping with the definition of conservative i have given. This inkeeps with the political system when it was set up as only a very select amount of people had a say. This made the political parties alot less accountable. With only an electorate of 800,000 out of a population of 24,000,000 the parties were only accountable to the aristocracy and a select few of the middle class. ...read more.

Middle

I also think that Earl Grey and the Whigs had some very suspect motives for wanted to bring the reform act into play. Perhaps not as some saw it at the time as a democratic measure that would change the face of Britian for ever but a much more conservative reason indeed. Earl Grey quite simply bought in the measure to safeguard Britain against revolution. E. A. Smith has claimed that "Grey presented reform as a means to restore the old constitution, not to create a new democratic one". I think this is very much true and although Grey never did say directly that he planned radical reform and to make Britian a more democratic place i don't think it is hard to see why some people were under that impression. In terms of the act being a limited measure i think that this statement has alot of merit. The non secret ballot stood as did many Rotten boroughs and out of a population of 24 million only 813,000 people could vote. A very limited effect i think as 1 in 7 men could vote and out of the whole population only 3% of people could vote. In my opinion i think that perhaps the act was designed to be limited. ...read more.

Conclusion

Universal Suffrage. In 1867 and then again later in 1884 the bill was amended and gradually the electorate began to grow. In long term also the Whigs gave way to form the Liberal Democrats, very much the opponents of Conservative measures despite the recent coalition. I can also see that at the time it may not have been seen as having limited effects at all. Such reforms as 36 boroughs with very small electorates were completly disenfranchised, Big industrial towns gained representation, county representation tripled and of course the uniform property qualification the impact on the political system at the time would have seemed pretty massive. In conclusion after analysis of all the sources and using my own knowledge i find myself leaning towards agreement with the statement. I think that in the Short Term it had no real bearing on the political landscape as it was intended too by the aristocracy and in the long term although it can be seen that it set the ball of change rolling i think that without this act the ball of change would have still been set rolling through the perhaps more direct route of revolution. The argument for the other side i find less compelling as an increase of 500,000 to 813,000 out of a population of 24 million, for me fits perfectly with the label of conservative as no real change was made. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay


**
This answer has some good features - the sources, when they are used, are used well, but in a source-based answer, they need to be interrogated and the balance needs to be extracted. The message, purpose and reliability of the sources also need to be challenged in the light of the enquiry.
This answer also needs to be better structured and organised - avoid writing in the first person. In addition, the answer is fairly narrow in its choice of arguments - this is a big topic which essentially in this answer tends to swirl around a conservative measure with limited effects to avoid revolution. It does little to rigorously challenge the proposition and offer more detailed evidence.

Marked by teacher Natalie Stanley 09/04/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Why did Labour win the 1945 election and lose in the 1951 election?

    Labour gave independence to India, Pakistan, Ceylon and Burma, and pulled out of Palestine. Labour argued that they had earned their independence by fighting in WW2, and that it was not economically viable to sustain them. However, the electorate did not empathise with this view, many now believing that the Conservatives were a more trustworthy option.

  2. Why was the reform act of 1832 passed?

    This accumulated into a massive problem that the government were not acting on and so strikes and riots grew creating the swing riots in 1830 where workers attacked machinery and burned barns. This was a major panic for the Tory government and could be seen as a main reason to

  1. Does Alexander II deserve the title of 'Tsar liberator'?

    ?It is better to abolish serfdom from above than to await the time when it will begin to abolish itself from below?[4]. This statement could be seen to be merely a persuasive technique employed by Alexander, and a way of getting the nobility to support him, perhaps a way of

  2. How successfully did the Liberal Reforms 1906-14 meet the social needs of the British ...

    Also, when attacking this problem of unemployment the second part of the National Insurance Act, 1911 introduced unemployment insurance which meant that payments were provided when your out of work. Within 2 years 2.3 million workers were insured which meant that people were given some form of financial support when they were out of work.

  1. To what extent was Arthur Balfour responsible for Conservative decline?

    This meant that many unemployed workers were now unable to emigrate to South Africa for work because the demand for labour had been filled by Chinese immigrants. The third reaction was from the trade unions. They believed that if the government could import cheap labour in one of its colonies, then they could do it here in Britain.

  2. Assess the validity of the view that the Rump and Barebones parliaments had no ...

    of creating a system of strict supervision of clerical appointments reached no agreements. The Rump did nothing on the question of tithes. Few Rumpers wished society to be left completely free in matters of morality, meaning there was to be no 'liberty of conscience'.

  1. Why did Pitt dominate politics 1783-93?

    Fox was linked with Prince George, the Prince was unpopular among many for wasting money, gaining huge gambling debts and having loose morals. Prince George was also disliked for treating the King badly during the regency crisis, only seeking more royal power whilst his father was ill.

  2. The Conservative Party under Bonar Law deserves the blame for the crisis over the ...

    Carson had hoped this would force Liberals to drop Home Rule and Bew argues that the need to restrain Unionist anger encouraged him to support the high risk strategy of running guns into Ulster. The Larne gun-running saw 25,000 rifles and 3 million rounds of ammunition distributed quickly without police stopping them.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work