• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do you agree with this interpretation of the problems faced by United States soldiers in Vietnam?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Do you agree with this interpretation of the problems faced by United States soldiers in Vietnam? Q3 During the late 1960's and early 1970's the anti-war protest movement swiftly gathered momentum. Many groups protested for numerous reasonsm, yet all of the groups had the same ideal, an end to the Vietnamese war. Through evaluating the sources and using my own knowledge I hope to provide an answer to why there was an anti-war movement in the US. Source A is concerned with US soldiers in Vietnam. It tells the reader how many of the new recruits scored low on intelligence tests and they would have 'never been let into a normal peace-time army'. This source suggests the high death rate of soldiers led to a severe drop in standards of would be soldiers. The draft army of soldiers appeared to be performing incompetently. The soldiers were faced with harsh conditions on arrival and were forced to tackle experienced guerrillas when they themselves had little or no experience of a war environment. 'Soldiers were most likely to die in the first month' this quotation tells us the severe terrain and lack of basic knowledge of the terrain lead to many deaths. ...read more.

Middle

The unconventional warfare the US soldiers were forced to fight. One britallion had 600 of its soldiers injured yet had never met the enemy. One soldier said, 'every time you took a step, you didn't know if you were going to loose a leg, a limb or a life' The second part of the source is concerned with the indoctrination and educational issues of combat needed to win the war and the difficulties in persuading 'the rightness of ones cause' to the civilians when using napalm bombs on them. This source does not tell us of how frustrated US soldiers murdered civilians, an example of this would have been the My Lai massacre when US troops famously unmercifully searched and destroyed the village with no regard for life. This source does not show any effects of US involvement in Vietnam therefore it would not provide us with any evidence as to why there was an anti-war movement in the USA. Source B shows a photograph of napalm victims, yet to the US and the rest of the world the media war began to indicate the humanitarian crisis in Vietnam. ...read more.

Conclusion

The author of the source also suggests that America would 'never be able to fight a war, however just' as the citizens were blinded by the humanitarian crisis and would forgot the causes for war. As the source was written for an audience of the 'British armed forces' it could be argued that the author was more biased to the problems the US faced than the good the war had done. In conclusion, I do realise these sources are limited in the information they give but they do give some reasons as to why there was an anti-war movement in the US. These sources show that the media was very influential in the Vietnam War however they do not show the audience it most effected which was 'middle America' - the voting public. The sources also do not indicate as to why black people protested against the draft or why Vietnam veterans threw their medals on Washington. Therefore I believe these sources provide us with some information but not enough to sufficiently prove why there was an anti-war movement in the US. Philippa Halliday 11H Mr Mackenzie ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Why was the United States forced to withdraw its soldiers from the Vietnam war

    As well as brutal American tactics leading to the peasants supporting the Vietcong there was also the fact that the Vietcong supplied the peasants with land. This was a very clever tactic as it gave the Vietcong support of many more villages.

  2. I will be looking at how the U.S became increasingly involved Vietnam, the problems ...

    persecution many of them received from the Christian government in South Vietnam. The support for the Viet Cong was increasing day by day. They were ridding Vietnam of the government that persecuted so many of their fellow Buddhists. The Americans knew that to have any chance of defeating the Communists

  1. How Useful are Sources A to C to Explain Why the United States Became ...

    As a result of this, Source G is a primary source and is likely to be biased, as it was said by an American soldier who is going to defend America at every opportunity. Source G talks about how the Americans went to war 'to do something courageous on behalf of their country'.

  2. How useful are sources A to C to explain why the United States became ...

    an American war critic, in October 1982, way after the end of the Vietnam War this shows that this source is a primary source. The producer of this source, professor Noam Chomsky, had a definite purpose of producing this source.

  1. Coursework on discussing whether television was an important reason why the United States lost ...

    This was meant to convince the peasants not to help the Vietcong as they had no choice but to resettle in villages away from the Vietcong controlled areas. So then the Americans and ARVN could isolate guerrillas. In the process of going into villages, they would shoot cows and bur all the rice.

  2. How Useful are Sources A-C to explain why the United States became involved in ...

    Looking at source B we can see that it is a primary source. It is President Johnson speaking in a private conversation in May 1964. Taking these two into account I do not think this will be a bias source because the president is not putting on an impression as he was in source A.

  1. History of the United States

    maintained their powerful confederacy with its sophisticated governing structure and strong religious faith. Allies of the English against the French along the Saint Lawrence River, they dominated a vast region westward to Lake Superior with their powerful and well-organized armies.

  2. Many peoples have contributed to the development of the United States of America, a ...

    The New England Colonies In 1620, Puritan Separatists, later called PILGRIMS, sailed on the MAYFLOWER to New England, establishing PLYMOUTH COLONY, the first permanent settlement there. They were followed in 1629 by other Puritans (see PURITANISM), under the auspices of the MASSACHUSETTS BAY COMPANY, who settled the area around Boston.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work