• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Documents Relating to the German-Soviet Non-Aggression Pact Aug 1939.

Extracts from this document...


Firouz Daneshvar IBS History September 30th, 2003 Block F Documents Relating to the German-Soviet Non-Aggression Pact Aug 1939 1 a) "Third Power" in Document A is referred as France, Britain and Italy or any other country that is a threat to Germany + Russia b) "A total disregard for the ideological principles which either party ostensibly professed?" is meant that the non-aggression pact bended the rules on what each side had agreed on. The treaty was very brutal, both regimes killed and oppressed their neighbors and did other atrocities. c) The real objective was that Stalin suspected was with another deal with Germany. The French and British wanted Russia to join to join them if war broke out. Hitler offered a deal to the Soviets for them not to stand aside and agrees not to enter the war and these two powers would not attack each other. ...read more.


In Document B the commissioner of Defense tells France and Britain they are waiting for an answer to move in to Poland if the Germans attacked but France and Britain make no effort to secure an alliance and the Soviets made a treaty with the Germans and harassed Poland. 3) Document C is true in the sense that Stalin did make a pact with Hitler. However, its reliability is questionable because it is clearly one mans opinion. He clearly does not think highly of Hitler and Stalin and thus I think he is Bias. Document D is also an opinion however it is less bias. It critisizes British French and Russian policies before World War 2. Therefore it can be viewed as reliable. Document F is obviously one sided and was probably made by someone anti Russian and German. But in a sense it is reliable because it points out the how the two powers oppressed Poland. ...read more.


Since he knew the Red Army was weak he made the alliance, because certainly the Soviets would agree to such a deal. On 23rd August 1939 Nazi Foreign Minister Ribbentrop and newly appointed Soviet Commissar for Foreign Affairs Molotov, signed the Nazi-Soviet Non-Aggression Pact the two countries which until that time had been bitter enemies, agreed not to attack each other. The signing of the pact meant that if Germany attacked Poland, then the Soviet Union would not come to its aid. Thus, if Germany went to war against the West (especially France and Great Britain) over Poland, the Soviets were guaranteeing that they would not enter the war; so basically not to open a second front for Germany. . For the Soviets for agreeing to not join the possible future war, Germany was giving the Soviets the Baltic States (Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania). Poland was also to be divided between the two the new territories gave the Soviets a buffer land. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Russia and the Soviet Union 1917-1924

    The train contained excellent facilities. What Happened to Tsar and his Family * After his abdication in March 1917, the Tsar and his family were held under house arrest just outside st. Petersburg * There were moved to Tobolsk in Siberia, then sent to Ekaterinburg in the Urals, where they

  2. Hitlers Germany

    Prime Minister Churchill was of the opinion that this time Hitler had "missed the bus." Unfortunately for the Allies, the Germans maintained complete superiority in the air. This enabled them to pour troops at will into any vital point. German troops advanced steadily north and by June 8 extinguished the last Norwegian resistance and forced the Allies to evacuate Narvik.

  1. Evaluate historical comparisons of Hitler and Stalin and their regimes

    class based enemies whereas the Nazis focussed on the race based enemies. What the book tries to do is show that there is "no moral distinction between the barbarities of right and left."21 Stephen Wheatcroft has argued that there important quantitative and qualitative differences in the way the two murdered their own citizens.

  2. Why did Stalin opt for the pact with Hitler in 1939?

    The 1934 Nazi-Polish Non-Aggression Pact could lead to an anti-Russian alliance and therefore Stalin had to swiftly search for collective security against Germany.Knowing that Hitler would eventually invade the Soviet Union, the only way to do this was to create pacts and in an inevitable world war, the USSR had to be on the winning side.

  1. What does the Soviet Experience provide with regard to the Institutionalisation of Ethnicity and ...

    Yet almost immediately, and amid the chaos engendered by the civil war, nationalities began peeling away from the Bolshevik sphere of influence. Stalin insisted that proletarian self-determination dictated that which was in the interests of the worker, to remain part of a larger proletarian state.

  2. A study of why the USSR signed a non aggression pact with Germany rather ...

    The Western Powers failed to respond to Soviet proposals for a grand Alliance under the protection of the League, therefore Stalin still felt isolated from the Western Powers. The Western Powers however, lost confidence in Stalin's strength of the army and his government after the purge of the Red Army

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work