• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Does Peter I of Russia deserve the title 'The Great'?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Does Peter I of Russia deserve the title 'The Great'? Peter I of Russia was bestowed with the title 'The Great' in 1721 by Chancellor Golovkin. There are only three examples in European history of contemporaries being offered the same title: the Great Elector after he resurrected Brandenburg-Prussia from the Thirty Years War; Frederick the Great who turned Prussia into a European force and Catherine who built on Peter's progress, transforming Russia into the predominant power of Europe. Opinions as to whether Peter also deserve the title ' Great' has remained largely polarised. Lindey Hughes and Alex de Jonge argue that, on the whole, Peter does deserve the prestigious title. Anderson and Kliuchevsky disagree saying that Peter was largely a favour. This essay will argue that Peter does, in some respects, deserve the title whereas in others he does not, based on an examination of the different factors that could make a monarch 'Great': the grandeur of royalty, large scale political changes, the quality of his domestic rule, his popularity, military achievements and whether his reputation lasted. ...read more.

Middle

If he never used Frederick the Great's phrase 'the first servant of the state', he came very close t it when he struck out 'the interests of his Tsarist Majestry' from a draft decree and replaced it with 'the interests of the state' as a proper object of a soldier's loyalty. However, the statement of Peter being an enlightened monarch must be with caution. The Enlightenment is argued my some as not having met him and many of his reforms were generally introduced as a result of immediate necessity, rather than as part of a rational plan. The popularity of a monarch is regarded by some as being a prerequisite for being given the title 'Great'. Peter recognised that he lacked this, saying to a foreign ambassador 'I am represented as a cruel tyrant'. Traditional clergy saw Peter as an anti-Christ, while in the church in general there was distrust of his anti-clerical measures, secularization and westernisation program. The traditional nobility were alienated by the introduction of state service by the cost of war with Sweden and by the apparent westernization. ...read more.

Conclusion

Lastly, Peter's gain of the Baltic also resulted in the demise of Russia's traditional enemy, Sweden. Lastly, a monarch's 'greatness' can be found by assessing whether their reputation lasted after their death. At first he was the subject of a cult, proliferated by Feofan Prokopovich and later figures including Catherine the Great. During the nineteenth century views began to polarise. He was either the source of all Russian progress or a destroyer of tradition and culture. During the twentieth century views became even more ambivalent, he was portrayed on the one hand as the ultimate representative of the exploitative western system and on the other as one of the great heroes of Russian history who personally worked alongside his compatriots. Therefore, the impact of Peter the Great on Russian society and imagination is unbroken, his only serious rival being Lenin. Like Peter, Lenin's reputation was launched by the creation of a personality cult. But Lenin's cult was destroyed by the collapse of the ideology to which it was tied. Peter has now re-emerged as the key figure in Russian history as point symbolised in 1991 by the restoration to Leningrad of its original name, St Petersburg. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Historical Periods section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Historical Periods essays

  1. The Enlightenment Essay

    "Francis Bacon is known for his association with empiricism, experiment and induction. He made careful observation of the natural world and collected as much data as possible and then he would draw conclusions or general laws" (Norton). Descartes' method took the opposite approach.

  2. What was the impact of the Norman Conquest

    However, the Barons were not able to grant all the knights themselves, therefore they too shared their land, and gave a fraction of plots (manors) towards men who promised to serve as knights. The Baron often lived in a castle at the centre of his estates on his own province (demesne), whilst the knights stayed in their manors.

  1. Strategy in Cortes' conquest of Mexico

    the delusion that no enemy - including the Spanish - would dare to launch an attack at or near harvest time. This false belief that they were no longer vulnerable to an assault by Cort�s is probably the Aztecs' biggest strategic failure.26 Meanwhile, Cort�s was busy assembling a comprehensive war strategy.

  2. Why Was King Alfred So Great?

    Clearly this proves his intelligence, and willingness to work for victory as opposed to allowing other to simply do his bidding. This further implemented Alfred's desire for fairness and justice, something that was prevalent throughout his social reform policies. Alfred made sweeping changes to the operation of his main army,

  1. The First English Civil War

    In Yorkshire, Sir Thomas Fairfax, advancing from Lancashire through the West Riding, joined his father. Selby was stormed on 11 April and thereupon, Newcastle, who had been manoeuvring against the Scots in Durham, hastily drew back. He sent his cavalry away, and shut himself up with his foot in York.

  2. The structures of the Soviet State were created by Lenin and abused by Stalin. ...

    profit while the state continued to control banks, foreign trade, and large industries;13 peasants were permitted to sell their produce for a profit, however a tax of 10% was also introduced; working hours were shortened and Trade Unions were given limited freedom to operate.

  1. To What Extent Was Russia Modernised During the Personal Reign of Peter the Great? ...

    cut off men?s beards himself and when this too also proved to be ineffective he introduced a bead and coat tax to encourage men to become clean shaven and to wear more westernised clothes. Peter wanted to change how the Russians looked as they were seen as ?backwards? and ?barbaric? by the rest of Europe.

  2. Despite frequent changes in policy, Russian and Soviet governments were spectacularly unsuccessful in securing ...

    Compared to the other Great powers of the period, Russia was lagging far behind. Between 1894 and 1913, Austria-Hungary had a 79% increase in national income whereas Russia was lagging far behind with only a 50% increase[17]. This clearly demonstrates that Russia?s overall situation was not so great and actually, Russian people did suffer.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work