• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Domestic pressure rather than events in Asia governed the USA's intervention in, and conduct of, the conflict in Korea

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"Domestic pressure rather than events in Asia governed the USA's intervention in, and conduct of, the conflict in Korea." How far do you agree with this view? On the 25th of June 1950, the communist North Korea (Democratic Peoples Republic of Korea) invaded the capitalist South Korea (Republic of Korea). Within two days, USA, the world's most powerful country, became involved in a civil war of a small Asiatic country. One of the main reasons USA became involved in the war were the domestic pressures Truman administration was under. However, other factors, such as events in Asia, international pressure and the concept of the Cold war context governed USA's involvement and conduct of the war. After the World War Two, America found itself in ideological and economic conflict with its one time ally, Russia. Nazism was replaced with Communism, and Stalin replaced Hitler. American propaganda vilified communism to the maximum, and the Truman administration was under pressure not to appear "soft on communism". This was especially true due to the repeated attacks by the Republicans on Truman. Spy scandals such as Algar Hiss case and the Rosenberger's added to general paranoia created by Senator McCarthy, a Republican. Truman was determined not become a victim of McCarthyism and to appear decisive in the war against communism. ...read more.

Middle

He also learned that appeasing aggressors never worked, and in his eyes Kim Il Sung was nothing more than Stalin's puppet. And that, arguably, is the most important reason why USA became involved. Americans saw Korean War in the Cold war context. To them everything that happened in the world was the result of the conflict between capitalist and communist. Due to their monolithic view of Communism, they were convinced that Kim was fighting on the orders of Stalin. Because of this they could not afford to lose anything - cold war was zero-sum game. Losing Korea would be unacceptable if they wanted to win the Cold war. Domestic pressures and events in Asia, as well influencing USA's decision to become involved in the war, had a tremendous impact on the conduct of the war. Although the expedition to Korea was nominally UN venture, the armed forces were dominantly American under the command of General MacArthur. As such, majority of the decisions were American. Previous events in Asia affected the opening stages of the war. Truman distrusted Sigmund Rhee, president of the Republic of Korea, and as such refused to give military weapons and support to Korea. USSR reinforced DPRK army had no problem in driving poorly armed ROK back into the Posen pocket. ...read more.

Conclusion

However, in addition to these arguments, there is strong indication that the Cold War context played a significant role in the conduct of the war. This is demonstrated by the continuing argument between the USA and Chinese forces over the treatment of Prisoners of War. Under Geneva convection, after cease of hostilities, all PoWs were to be returned to their forces. USA however, found that many Chinese and North Korean soldiers did not wish to return. They considered this a major propaganda victory if it can be used. As such, they refused to surrender all the PoWs, resulting in continuing of hostilities long after it was necessary. This event indicates that American's considered Korea just a steppingstone in the Cold war. To them, the propaganda victory was more important than ending the war. They wanted to win the Cold War, not so much the Korean War. From all the different factors, it can be determined that although domestic pressure had a great deal of influence over America's involvement and conduct of Korean War, it was not a prevailing factor. And, in spite of their importance, were the events in Asia. It was the Cold War context under which USA regarded the Korean War that was the primary influence on the USA behaviour. USA was aiming to win the cold war, and behaved with that aim in mind. ?? ?? ?? ?? Maja Jovanovski 07/05/2007 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Why did North Korea invade South Korea in June 1950, and why did USA ...

    USSR and China became closer following the end of the Chinese Civil War because in early 1949, Mao outlined future PRC foreign policy. It was based on the principles of making a new start, consolidating the Chinese Communist Party's (CCP) domestic position, fostering economic growth and 'leaning to one side'.

  2. Korean propaganda during the Second World War and the Korean War had a different ...

    On the other hand, the middle class and peasants were treated with no respect, and they were to give into the Japanese government without anything in return. There was indubitably a bias in opinion and ideology on the war in the higher class, who were benefiting from the war, and being for it.

  1. A Study of Air Supremacy in the Korean War.

    Pilots were instructed to head for that island if they got into trouble. The SA-16 amphibious rescue plane, which enjoyed speed and range over the helicopters, accounted for many of the water pick-ups in that region. In all, FEAF's Air Rescue Service recovered 996 United Nation troops from behind enemy lines, of which 170 were United States Air Force airmen.

  2. Free essay

    The Korean War represented total defeat for the Truman Doctrine? H. Brogan. How far ...

    stop him being the dictator of his people, and many believed that his regime was authoritarian, corrupt and inefficient. After the war he remained as the leader, being voted back with an overwhelming majority in both 1956 and 1960, but it was believed the elections were unfair and caused wide-spread

  1. North Korea and South Korea after the Korean war.

    have nothing to do with reuniting the two states into one nation, but it is symbolic and shows cooperation from both sides of the DMZ. After successfully reuniting families, on July 4th 1972 officials from the ROC and DPRK exchanged visits and agreed to work towards a peaceful reunification.

  2. How far was the USA's military involvement in Korea the consequence of a desire ...

    to an end and proved the USSR were becoming almost technologically superior to the US which perhaps made them feel threatened that their position as the world's leading superpower was under attack. This feeling may have meant there was a deep animosity within the US towards the Soviet Union, thus

  1. Red Scare and USA domestic policy in the 50´s.

    Furthermore, American spies reported to President Truman that Stalin was using the Cominform to help communists gain power in Malaya, Indonesia, Burma, the Philippines and Korea. Truman and the Americans watched this with increasing anxiety. They thought that communist countries were acting together to spread communism.

  2. Introduction - US policy to Southeast Asia in general

    calls 'direct US involvement' came in early 1950 - the US 'opted to prop up an embattled colonial regime in order to prevent a communist victory and also to retain French support in the European theatre of the Cold War'19 At a Paris meeting in May 1950, Secretary of State

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work