• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Dunkirk was a great deliverance and a great disaster" (AJP Taylor) - Is there sufficient evidence in Sources A to G to support this interpretation? Use the sources and knowledge from your studies to explain your answer.

Extracts from this document...


Target: Main target - evaluation of sources for their sufficiency, drawing conclusions from evidence (AO 6.2 and 6.3 and 6.1) "Dunkirk was a great deliverance and a great disaster." (AJP Taylor). Is there sufficient evidence in Sources A to G to support this interpretation? Use the sources and knowledge from your studies to explain your answer. From knowledge, sources A to G, and from other sources, I know that Dunkirk could be seen as both a disaster and deliverance. I am going to go through the facts and sources and then decide whether or not there is enough evidence to support AJP Taylor's quote. Source A, is a contemporary painting of troops being rescued from the beaches, by Charles Cundall, from which we can see German bomber planes bombing the British troops. This shows Dunkirk to be a disaster. ...read more.


This was that "everything was perfect" and that the British troops were all safe and that the Germans would not defeat Britain. In Source A, this image of "everything being perfect" is portrayed, as overall, there is an image of a British Victory being exposed. This is the point where I can comment on the insufficiency of this source, because it only shows you what the British Government wanted you to see. Source B, is a photograph of the Dunkirk beaches. Firstly, from the photograph we can see that there is no German bombing of any kind. The British troops seem to be patiently waiting on the beach, and we do not even in fact know from this source whether or not this evacuation at Dunkirk actually even took place and even if this is a Dunkirk beach, as we are having to take the sources at face value. ...read more.


Source D, is an extract from a speech by Anthony Eden, Minister of War, June 1940. Firstly, I am going to state the fact that this source is biased, as it is a speech by the Minister of War, whose job is to keep British spirits high, and so therefore, obviously he would not mention any major aspects of failure and defeat. In the Source, the Minister of War praises the British Soldiers, saying that they did not just give up, but they remained a "body of seasoned veterans". He calls them this as they have had an experience of war already. This makes the Battle of Dunkirk a deliverance as the soldiers have been said to have carried on fighting instead of giving up and this shows us that there morale was high. Anthony Eden admits to "great losses in equipment", this is a disaster as they have lost armament and expensive equipment. This source is also a form of propaganda as the speech is aimed at keeping the British spirit and morale high. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Vietnam - Is there sufficient evidence in sources D to K to support this ...

    Source J is another photograph, showing an anti-war demonstration at Kent State University in America. Demonstrations such as this one occurred worldwide, and they gave citizens a chance to display their views regarding the war. People may have changed their attitudes because of these demonstrations, and even if they did

  2. Vietnam Sources Questions

    It was written 15 years after the war finished and so had hindsight on the situation. It views the peace movement as the main reason why the war ended. Source P is and extract from a history book that gives 5 reasons why America wanted the war to end: Bereavement, inflation, drug addiction, protesters and the possibility of nuclear weapons.

  1. chernobyl disaster

    The first was published in August 1986 and effectively placed the blame solely on the power plant operators. The second theory, proposed by Valeri Legasov and published in 1991, attributed the accident to flaws in the RBMK reactor design, specifically the control rods.

  2. The Great Terror in Leningrad: a Quantitative Analysis.

    was directed against members of the party, mainly those who had in their time participated in the oppositions or who had shown some kind of dissent with Stalinist policies'. [7] After this, the purges were directed more generally at 'anti-Soviet elements', as well as 'unreliable elements' in the frontier regions,

  1. Vietnam Sources Questions

    and radios all of which informed people on day to day happenings and all of which were relatively uncensored. Even though they all put forth similar messages, television was more reliable, direct and visual. People believed what they saw. Source f gives us a good idea of how influential television

  2. Vietnam Sources Questions

    These 3 sources can not be generalized as it is not the view and attitude that all American politicians have making these sources an adequacy issue it is also one sided. Question 3 Study sources 5,6&7. How far do these sources explain why Americans supported the Anti-War Movement?

  1. Vietnam and the AWM Sources Questions

    So, we only have two opposing viewpoints here, but we are not told which view the majority of the Democratic Party hold. I think the reliability is limited, as both views are biased, as they are personal opinions. Also, we have to question why these men were so passionate in their approach.

  2. The most important aim of wartime propaganda was to encourage hatred of the enemy"Do ...

    Although this source is very effective for its purpose, it has no hatred for the Germans. The second part of the source is another poster using women to persuade men to enlist to the war. The picture shows two women and a child looking on, as soldiers get ready to leave for war.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work