• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Dunkirk was a great deliverance and a great disaster" (AJP Taylor) - Is there sufficient evidence in Sources A to G to support this interpretation? Use the sources and knowledge from your studies to explain your answer.

Extracts from this document...


Target: Main target - evaluation of sources for their sufficiency, drawing conclusions from evidence (AO 6.2 and 6.3 and 6.1) "Dunkirk was a great deliverance and a great disaster." (AJP Taylor). Is there sufficient evidence in Sources A to G to support this interpretation? Use the sources and knowledge from your studies to explain your answer. From knowledge, sources A to G, and from other sources, I know that Dunkirk could be seen as both a disaster and deliverance. I am going to go through the facts and sources and then decide whether or not there is enough evidence to support AJP Taylor's quote. Source A, is a contemporary painting of troops being rescued from the beaches, by Charles Cundall, from which we can see German bomber planes bombing the British troops. This shows Dunkirk to be a disaster. ...read more.


This was that "everything was perfect" and that the British troops were all safe and that the Germans would not defeat Britain. In Source A, this image of "everything being perfect" is portrayed, as overall, there is an image of a British Victory being exposed. This is the point where I can comment on the insufficiency of this source, because it only shows you what the British Government wanted you to see. Source B, is a photograph of the Dunkirk beaches. Firstly, from the photograph we can see that there is no German bombing of any kind. The British troops seem to be patiently waiting on the beach, and we do not even in fact know from this source whether or not this evacuation at Dunkirk actually even took place and even if this is a Dunkirk beach, as we are having to take the sources at face value. ...read more.


Source D, is an extract from a speech by Anthony Eden, Minister of War, June 1940. Firstly, I am going to state the fact that this source is biased, as it is a speech by the Minister of War, whose job is to keep British spirits high, and so therefore, obviously he would not mention any major aspects of failure and defeat. In the Source, the Minister of War praises the British Soldiers, saying that they did not just give up, but they remained a "body of seasoned veterans". He calls them this as they have had an experience of war already. This makes the Battle of Dunkirk a deliverance as the soldiers have been said to have carried on fighting instead of giving up and this shows us that there morale was high. Anthony Eden admits to "great losses in equipment", this is a disaster as they have lost armament and expensive equipment. This source is also a form of propaganda as the speech is aimed at keeping the British spirit and morale high. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Vietnam - Is there sufficient evidence in sources D to K to support this ...

    Source J is another photograph, showing an anti-war demonstration at Kent State University in America. Demonstrations such as this one occurred worldwide, and they gave citizens a chance to display their views regarding the war. People may have changed their attitudes because of these demonstrations, and even if they did

  2. chernobyl disaster

    The first was published in August 1986 and effectively placed the blame solely on the power plant operators. The second theory, proposed by Valeri Legasov and published in 1991, attributed the accident to flaws in the RBMK reactor design, specifically the control rods.

  1. Is there sufficient evidence in sources A to F to explain why there was ...

    scores of many men when they were conscripted. A lot of the new conscripts weren't that clever as the men available for conscription in Universities could get out of it with studying by studying a degree. This source doesn't explain the anti-war movement; it just helps us to understand the

  2. Qu 3 Did public opinion in Britain support ...

    There were many reasons for people to be against military action. Many people were simply fed up with war, having had to endure the First and Second World Wars, and more recently the Korean War. Accordingly people would shudder at the prospect of yet another war.

  1. Study source A. Do you agree with this interpretation of problems faced by U.S ...

    fight but they would have also not known how to go about things. When most of the soldiers had been fighting for six months in a way, they sat back and let the new recruits do all of the work.

  2. Television was an important reason why the United States lost the war in Vietnam. ...

    Nixon was already in power, deciding whether to end the war. The picture was so controversial that newspapers were at first reluctant to print the picture, they claimed it was full frontal nudity. The purpose of the picture was to shock Americans, and was motivation for a peace movement.

  1. The Great Terror in Leningrad: a Quantitative Analysis.

    Oleg Khlevnyuk, in particular, has outlined the different stages of the terror in terms of the targets of the purges, and has offered a more refined periodisation of the actual beginnings of mass repression. He has pointed out that 'up until the middle of 1937, the main blow of repression

  2. Anzacs and the Gallipoli Campaign of 1915. How useful are the views of the ...

    Whether this is achieved or not is a matter of opinion, because if you admire confidence over professionalism then the Anzacs are most assuredly made to look better. The source is also based during the time and so it is primary data, which is always more reliable than secondary data.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work