• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Elizabeth I: There is much debate amongst historians concerning the religious priorities of Elizabeth in formulating the momentous Church Settlement of 1559

Extracts from this document...


Elizabeth I: The Religious Settlement of 1559 There is much debate amongst historians concerning the religious priorities of Elizabeth in formulating the momentous Church Settlement of 1559, which was to shape the Church of England for years to come. Many factors can lay claim to shaping the Settlement, but in order to judge which one influenced it most strongly; one must look at the Settlement itself, which contains a strong base of Protestantism but with conservative concessions. Taking into account Elizabeth's own personal beliefs, which were conveniently politically shrewd, Elizabeth seemed to have adopted the pragmatic policy of trying to please everyone and to keep internal peace, with a Settlement containing enough Catholic superficiality to keep her conservative subjects, if not bishops, contented. The traditional view of the Settlement, taken by historians such as J.E Neale, is that it was influenced by Protestant pressure applied by Puritans returning from abroad and that Elizabeth herself favoured the conservative methods. This view relied mainly on evidence about the 'Puritan Choir', a group of committed Puritan MPs led by Sir Francis Knollys and Sir Anthony Cooke, making up a quarter of the 404 members of Parliament. ...read more.


Cecil, Bacon, Knollys and she was publicly identified with Protestantism, a factor that led her to be crowned by the junior Bishop of Carlisle as the other Catholic bishops did not want to get involved. At the Christmas Mass of 1558, Elizabeth dramatically swept out of the royal chapel after the host was raised and in early 1559 at the State Opening of Parliament, she eschewed the monks carrying tapers, saying 'Away with these torches, we can see very well!' Elizabeth may not (in the words of Haigh) have been a 'card-carrying Calvinist' but she certainly wasn't a Catholic. Indeed the Catholic Church saw her as illegitimate and would not recognise her as a rightful claimant to the throne. Elizabeth also did not desire to be associated with the unpopularity of the Marian regime, especially as they were so easy to compare, considering they were both women. However, taking into account the level of Catholic opposition and the danger of upsetting the major Catholic powers, especially after the treaty of Cateau-Cambr�sis in April 1559, Elizabeth was forced to make compromises from her beliefs and to take the option that was the most politically shrewd and beneficial for her subjects, to have a 'via media' between Catholicism and Protestantism. ...read more.


Catholic pressure was certainly more influential as so many concessions were made to Catholicism, however it always remained rooted in Protestantism. Elizabeth's personal beliefs were certainly important but she did not let them cloud her judgement when forming the Settlement, as her main priority was to ensure that everyone in England could attend their parish church, conforming to a religion that suited them. In order to do this she leant more towards Protestantism, her religion of preference, with Catholic concessions to ensure that the Settlement got past Parliament and would not alienate her Catholic subjects, many of whom were used to the return to Catholicism of Mary's reign. Unlike Mary, she had no strong religious zeal to convert her subjects to her own religion but recognised that care and caution were necessary and so adjusted her Settlement accordingly, especially after the unexpectedly strong opposition of the Catholic Lords shocked her in February 1559. Therefore the verdict must be that Elizabeth's main priority when forming the settlement of 1559 was her subjects and the well-being of her country, perfectly summed up by Count Von Helffstein writing in 1559, 'A very prudent action, for the less she ruffles them at the beginning of her reign, the more easily she will enthral them at the end.' ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

4 star(s)

The key strength of this essay is the sharp focus on the issue of weighing up the factors that shaped and influenced the settlement. It also has a confident style and used detail about the period to precisely support the points being made. There is good reasoning and this shows a grasp of the complex situation Elizabeth was in and does not over simplify the issue.
If this was for A Level course work there would need to be more use of the views of historians and more carefully selected quotes.

Marked by teacher Kate Forbes 29/08/2012

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    How serious a threat did the Puritans pose to Elizabeth I and her Church?

    4 star(s)

    She also told the French Ambassador that Puritans wished to recognise 'neither God nor king', but in 1591 she told Sir Francis Knollys that 'in her opinion the Puritans represented just as grave a threat to her as did the Catholics'.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    How successfully did Elizabeth I handle her finances?

    3 star(s)

    A way in which Elizabeth increased sources of revenue domestically was that she collected debts more vigorously than before. Although this was against her will, this was just another way in which Elizabeth could raise revenue. A counter argument for the increasing sources of revenue is that although revenue increased

  1. How successfully did Elizabeth deal with her Parliament?

    This was important as it meant that she had their financial support. Elizabeth dealt with the issue of marriage, by simply giving her parliament a vague reply.

  2. how significant was the catholic threat to elizabeth 1, posed by her roman catholic ...

    Although it would seem that Mary, Queen of Scots was a 'significant' threat to Elizabeth, primarily because of her huge foundation of support, in actuality was the support as great as it seemed, especially within England, or was there a flaw for Mary in that, some English Catholics saw her

  1. How and why did Lord Liverpool survive the Radical Challenges of 1812 ...

    Overall, the radical groups were not a serious threat. While they appeared to be a serious threat using violence to protest against machinery, for example the Luddities, or aimed to use violence like Spa Fields they were easily stopped by the authorities on the information of the spies who tried to provoke them to more serious action.

  2. Why did the Absolute Monarchy Collapse between May and October 1789?

    session with the three estates in an attempt to break the deadlock. Even if the session had tried to be effective, it appeared as too late to the rest of the country and a definite appearance of loss of control.

  1. What kind of king does Shakespeare create in Act 3 Scenes 1 and 2? ...

    The boy overall gives a positive impression of Henry, by deciding to follow him and leaving Nym, Bardolph and Pistol as they are no examples of men. The boy reflects the innocence of a child, and how Henry has influenced him, this shows that Henry's speech has worked well as

  2. Why did Pitt dominate politics 1783-93?

    A rebellion in Holland that saw the King, William V and his wife, arrested. The wife of the King happened to be the sister of the Prussian leader, Frederick William II, and Pitt threw his support behind the Prussians when they invaded Holland in September 1787.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work