• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Essay: How serious was the Yorkist threat to Henry VII?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

22/09/09 'How serious was the Yorkist threat to Henry VII?' Henry VII was the King of England between 1485 and 1509, and in that time faced many threats to his monarchy. The three main threats came from Lambert Simnel, Perkin Warbeck and the de la Pole family; especially Edmund de la Pole. However, we need to know how serious the threat to Henry kingship was and how close he came to losing the crown. In this essay I will discuss each pretender and rebellion and come to a conclusion on how serious the threat from the Yorkists to Henry VII really was. The first notable threat to Henry was the Lovell conspiracy. Although a complete farce and fiasco, the Lovell conspiracy laid the foundations for future rebellions and pretenders. The conspiracy was planned in 1486 by Francis, Viscount Lovell and two important and powerful landowners in Worcestershire; Thomas and Humphrey Stafford. The motives for this planned attack are unclear, however we do know that Lovell was an important member of Richard III's household and was a close friend, and therefore we assume he wanted to re-instate a Yorkist King onto the throne because he saw the Yorkists as rightful claimants to the throne. The plan was to seize the King as he travelled north through the midlands, kidnap and kill him. Unfortunately for Lovell and the Stafford brothers, the plan failed terribly. ...read more.

Middle

The plan was very well planned; it is plain to see that the Yorkists learned from their mistakes from the Lovell conspiracy. Along with support from Ireland, Lincoln showed they had big support from abroad with the backing of Margaret of Burgundy, who greatly helped Simnel. Margaret proved to be a force to be reckoned with, as she gave the rebels military support and money. I believe this threat was very serious to Henry VII as it came as far as a battle which Henry could have so easily lost and was so much more serious than the Lovell conspiracy. However, because Henry won the battle and defeated the rebels, it not only showed everybody he was a great leader and fighter, but also that he would be ruthless in dealing with rebellions, pretenders and traitors. The final threat, and probably most serious threat came from pretender 'Perkin Warbeck'. Perkin Warbeck was the son of a Tournai customs officer born in 1475 who became to impersonate the younger son of Edward IV - one of the 'Princes in the Tower'. It is said that, he was taken Ireland he impersonated Richard, after he had gained a large Yorkist interest. However, Warbeck failed to get support from Irish lords, importantly the Earl of Kildare refused to help him (he had pleaded his loyalty to Henry after his involvement in the Lambert Simnel affair). ...read more.

Conclusion

closer took as he had huge support both in England and abroad and Henry was forced to give up a lot to retrieve him, for example the Treaty of Etaples. However, as I have said Perkin Warbeck never got as far as a final battle for the throne whereas the Lovell conspiracy and Lambert Simnel did. In conclusion, after studying the main Yorkist threats to Henry VII I believe that the threat was considerably serious to Henry. I think that the Lambert Simnel plot was the most serious as he received huge foreign support, from Ireland and Burgundy. Also, it came all the way to a final battle which Henry may have lost, therefore losing the crown and his life, the same can be said with the Lovell conspiracy, if planned a little better Henry would have successfully been captured and most likely executed. Although Perkin Warbeck never got very far in terms of invasions and military action, he had the most backing and protection, again from Burgundy but this time also from Scotland and Emperor Maximilian. Furthermore, it showed Henry that his government and even his close friends could not be trusted, Sir William Stanley for example. Combining the three most serious Yorkist threats I believe that the Yorkist threat was considerably serious to Henry as the plots had received support both in England and from abroad and Henry came very close to losing the throne and his life at the Battle of Stoke. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. How dangerous were the threats to Henry VII's government?

    This rebellion, like that of Lambert Simnel, showed that Henry didn't seem to know how to react to this sort of behaviour towards the crown, as 15,000 people managed to march nearly all the way to London without being stopped or intercepted.

  2. Who was the greater threat to Henry VII's throne, Lambert Simnel or Perkin Warbeck?

    At the battle of Stoke, none of the country's Nobles had stepped in to defend Henry when Simnel invaded the country which could not only be seen as a lack of respect that they held for Henry but also this opinion could have been shared vastly throughout the whole of

  1. Were the pretenders a serious threat to Henry VII's throne?

    The leading noble who supported Warbeck was Sir William Stanley, who had made the decisive move in the Battle of Bosworth by fighting for Henry. He was a surprise supporter, but since Lambert Simnel, Henry had increased his spy network and Stanley was soon found out and executed.

  2. The Battle of Bosworth.

    But would the Stanley's help Henry or Richard. However, due to Richard's position on top of the hill , Richard was able to see the Stanley's and any movement towards them he would clearly have been able to see Henry.

  1. Charlemagne Essay.

    Charles placed military burdens on all freemen, but the recruitment system took into account variations in wealth of freemen, the distance of the campaign and the threat the enemy posed when it was decided who should serve. An example of showing flexibility of military system is the 807 capitularies, 'ordered

  2. Henry VII and His Money.

    back the debts, which he had contracted with continental bankers to finance his invasion. He clearly realized the value of sound credit, in case he should ever want to borrow more money. Throughout this period the government was seen as the King's government, and people expected the King to pay

  1. Was Lambert Simnel a greater threat to the security of Henry VII than Perkin ...

    Margaret became involved as she was using Simnel in order to restore the Yorkist succession, but also for personal reasons as she was agreeing with her nephew. Margaret's support for Simnel brought a great impact to Henry's security, because she had considerable political skills and a lot of money, and as Colin Pendill described 'she was a formidable foe'.

  2. How serious a threat did the pretenders pose to Henry VII's crown?

    Symonds helped by John de la Pole (an influential yorkist), took Simnel off to Ireland, a yorkist stronghold, where he was presented as Edward VI to the Earl of Kildare newly escaped from the Tower, the Irish happily accepted Symonds story.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work